Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of quinidine on the binding of [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin by human lymphocytes

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To explore the molecular basis of the glycoside-quinidine interaction, the in vitro effect of quinidine on the binding of [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin to Na+ K+ ATPase receptors on human mononuclear cells was investigated. The maximum [3H]-ouabain binding capacity was 45.7±9.4×103 molecules/cell in pure lymphocyte preparations (n=8) and 75.5±7.3×103 molecules/cell in mixtures of mononuclear cells (n=8). These parameters were not influenced by 10−5 M quinidine. In eight equilibrium experiments with pure lymphocytes, the dissociation constant of [3H]-ouabain increased from 0.79±0.26×10−8 M in the absence of 10−5 M quinidine to 1.56±0.74×10−8 M in its presence (p<0.01), indicating that the affinity of the drug was decreased. Similar findings were observed using mixed mononuclear cells. In five uptake and release experiments, quinidine decreased the association rate constant of [3H]-ouabain from 3.15±0.36×104 M−1×s−1 to 2.01±0.37×104 M−1 s−1 (p<0.01), whereas the dissociation rate constant was not affected. A therapeutic concentration of quinidine does not affect the number of glycoside receptors on lymphocytes, but it does appear to reduce fractional receptor occupancy by both [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin at lower tracer concentrations. This finding is compatible with the clinical observation that quinidine reduces the distribution volume of digoxin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball WJ Jr, Tse-Eng D, Bilezikian JP, Wallick E, Schwartz A, Butler VP (1979) Studies of a quinidine — digoxin interaction. Fed Proc 38: 1042

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bigger JT Jr (1981) The quinidine — digoxin interaction (editorial) Int J Cardiol 1: 109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clausen T, Wang P, Ørskov H, Kristensen O (1980) Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis. Relationships between changes in plasma water, electrolytes, insulin and catecholamines during attacks. Scand J Lab Invest 40: 211–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doering W (1979) Digoxin — quinidine interaction. N Engl J Med 301: 400–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doering W, Fichtl B, Herrmann M, Besenfelder E (1982) Quinidine — digoxin interaction: Evidence for involvement of an extrarenal mechanism. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 21: 281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ejvinsson G (1978) Effect of quinidine on plasma concentrations of digoxin. Br Med J 1: 279–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdmann E, Hasse W (1975) Quantitative aspects of ouabain binding to human erythrocyte and cardiac membranes. J Physiol Lond 251: 671–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner JD, Conlon TP (1972) The effect of sodium and potassium on ouabain binding by human erythrocytes. J Gen Physiol 60: 609–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hager WD, Fenster P, Mayersohn M, Perrier D, Graves P, Marcus FI, Goldman S (1979) Digoxin — quinidine interaction, pharmacokinetic evaluation. N Engl J Med 300: 1238–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamer J (1979) Drugs for heart disease. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hirsh PD, Weiner HJ, North RL (1980) Further insights into digoxin-quinidine interaction: Lack of correlation between serum digoxin concentration and inotropic state of the heart. Am J Cardiol 46: 863–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim D, Akera T, Brody TM (1981) Effects of quinidine on the cardiac glycoside sensitivity of guinea-pig and rat heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 217: 559–565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leahey EB Jr, Reiffel JA, Drusin RE, Heisenbuttel RH, Lovejoy WP, Bigger JT Jr (1978) Interaction between digoxin and quinidine. J Am Med Assoc 240: 533–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leahey EB Jr, Hougen TJ, Bigger JT Jr, Smith TW (1980) Effect of quinidine on digoxin-inhibited monovalent cation active transport. Circulation 62 (III): 258

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen KE, Hastrup J, Hvidt S (1980) Effect of quinidine on digoxin kinetics in cardiac patients. Acta Med Scand 207: 291–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schenck-Gustafsson K, Dahlqvist R (1981) Pharmacokinetics of digoxin in patients subjected to the quinidine-digoxin interaction. Br J Clin Pharmacol 11: 181–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schenck-Gustafsson K, Jogestrand T, Nordlander R, Dahlquist R (1981) Effect of quinidine on digoxin concentration in skeletal muscle and serum in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 305: 209–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Straub KD, Kane JJ, Bisset JK, Doherty JE (1978) Alteration of digitalis binding by quinidine: A mechanism of digitalisquinidine interaction. Circulation 58 [Suppl 2]: 11–58

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steiness E, Waldorff S, Hansen PB, Kjærgaard H, Buch J, Egeblad H (1980) Reduction of digoxin-induced inotropism during quinidine administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27: 791–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiland GA, Molinoff PB (1981) Quantitative analysis of drug-receptor interactions: I. Determination of kinetic and equilibrium properties. Life Sci 29: 313–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiley JS, Kraft N, Cooper IA (1979) The binding of ouabain to normal and chronic lymphocytic leukemic lymphocytes. Blood 54: 994–1000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, K.E., Klitgaard, N.A. Influence of quinidine on the binding of [3H]-ouabain and [3H]-digoxin by human lymphocytes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25, 263–270 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543801

Key words

Navigation