Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 1931–1936 | Cite as

Study of chromate coatings obtained on phosphatized steels: a characterization by AES and XPS techniques

  • L. Fedrizzi
  • F. Marchetti


Electrogalvanized and phosphatized steel sheets were passivated in chromate baths, and both the composition and temperature of these were varied in order to study the effects of such parameters on the chromate film formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) together with microanalytical electronic spectroscopy techniques such as Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were chosen as the most useful methods for a suitable and careful study of the chromate presence, distribution and thickness. The chromium presence on the treated surfaces is easily detectable by XPS. Moreover it is possible to compare the surface chromium content of differently produced specimens. The detection of chromium is more difficult using AES, due to charging problemS. Nevertheless, by this technique we found that the passive film is not homogeneously distributed on the whole phosphatized surface, but it is localized on randomly distributed areas, the chromate passive layer being very thin (about 4 nm). With respect to corrosion resistance of electrogalvanized steel, it seems that passivation in baths containing only Cr3+ is more effective than passivation in baths containing Cr6+.


Chromate Corrosion Resistance Steel Sheet Passive Film Auger Electron Spectroscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Chiland, S. Matieu, P. Pichante and G. Quinchon, in “Proceedings of SAE Meeting on Corrosion: coatings and steel” (SAE, Detroit, Michigan, 1986) p. 154.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Zeller III and R. F. Savinell, Corr. Sci. 26 (1986) 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. G. Cole, in “Corrosion”, edited by L. L. Shreir (Newnes Butterworths, London, 1979) p. 16, 33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. S. I. Phosphate Coatings (Drafting) Panel, J. Iron St. Inst. 170 (1952) 10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. L. Bonora, in “Proceedings of the XIX FATIPEC Congress on Characterization, Pretreatments and Protecting of Galvanized Steel”, Aachen, September 1988. Edited by Ungeheur-Ulmer, p. IV/1.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. K. Bairamow, S. Zakipour and L. Leygraf, Corr. Sci. 25 (1985) 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Fedrizzi, A. Tomasi, S. Pedrotti and P. L. Bonora, in press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. L. Bonora, A. Barbucci, G. Busca, V. Loren-. zelli, E. Miglio and G. G. Ramis, Proceedings of the XXth National Congress of Inorganic Chemistry, Pavia, Italy, September 1987. Edited by AIC, Rome.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Satoh, Surf. Coat. Techn. 30 (1987) 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Biestek and J. Weber, “Electrolytic and chemical conversion coatings” (Portcullis Press Ltd, 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. G. Pantano and T. E. Madey, Appl. Surf. Science 7 (1981) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Fedrizzi
    • 1
  • F. Marchetti
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering DepartmentUniversity of TrentoMesiano di PovoItaly
  2. 2.Material Science DivisionI.R.S.T.TrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations