Summary
Relationships between proneness to behavioral stereotypy (Ster) measured in a problem-solving task (electromaze) and decision-making behavior (under conditions of risk and certainty, chance and skill) were investigated using 64 subjects. Subjects more stereotyped in the electromaze (Ster +) tended to also be more stereotyped in their decision-making behavior. Ster was not related to extraversion, neuroticism, rigidity or overall electromaze performance, but Ster − more often required an excessive number of trials for task solution. The decision making of males tended to be more stereotyped. The results were discussed in terms of the construct validity and theoretical interpretation of Ster.
Zusammenfassung
Es wurden Beziehungen zwischen der Neigung zur Verhaltensstereotypie (Ster), die bei einer Problemlösungsaufgabe gemessen wurde, und dem Entscheidungsverhalten (mit und ohne Risiko, wobei der Erfolg sowohl durch den Zufall wie auch durch das Können der Vp bestimmt wurde) untersucht. Vpn, die sich im Electromaze stereotyp verhielten (Ster +), verhielten sich auch bei ihren Entscheidungen stereotyp. Es wurden keine Beziehungen zwischen Ster und den Variablen Extraversion, Neurotizismus, Rigidität und Gesamtleistung im Electromaze gefunden, jedoch benötigten Ster − häufiger eine extrem lange Serie von Versuchen zur Aufgabenlösung. Die männliche Vpn neigten stärker dazu, in Entscheidungssituationen stereotyp zu reagieren. Die Ergebnisse wurden vom Standpunkt der Konstruktvalidität und der theoretischen Grundlage der Ster aus diskutiert.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aborn, M., Rubenstein, H.: Information theory and immediate recall. J. exp. Psychol. 44, 260–266 (1952).
Alexander, F., French, T. M.: Psychoanalytic therapy. New York: Ronald 1946.
Armitage, S. G., Brown, C. R., Denny, M. R.: Stereotypy of responses in schizophrenics. J. clin. Psychol. 20, 225–230 (1964).
Atkinson, J. W., Bastian, J. R., Earl, R. W., Litwin, G. H.: The achievement motive, goal setting, and probability preferences. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 60, 27–36 (1960).
Attneave, F.: Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt 1959.
Berlyne, D. E.: Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between informationtheory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychol. Rev. 64, 329–339 (1957).
—: Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill 1960.
—: Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In: Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: a study of a science, Vol. 5, 284–364 New York: McGraw-Hill 1963.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., Austin, G. A.: A study of thinking. New York: Wiley 1956.
Brengelmann, J. C., Brengelmann, L.: Deutsche Validierung von Fragebogen der Extraversion, neurotischen Tendenz und Rigidität. Z. exp. angew. Psychol. 7, 291–331 (1960a).
— —: Deutsche Validierung von Fragebogen dogmatischer und intoleranter Haltungen. Z. exp. angew. Psychol. 7, 451–471 (1960b).
Carron, A. V.: Intra-task reliability and specificity of individual consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills 30, 583–587 (1970).
Cartwright, D., Festinger, L.: A quantitative theory of decision. Psychol. Rev. 50, 595–621 (1943).
Chown, S. M.: Rigidity — a flexible concept. Psychol. Bull. 56, 195–223 (1959).
Cohen, J., Hansel, C. E. M.: Risk and gambling. London: Philosophical Library 1956.
Cronbach, L. J., Meehl, P. E.: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302 (1955).
Cowden, J. E.: Prediction enhancement through the use of moderator variables. J. cons. clin. Psychol. 33, 621–624 (1969).
Davis, G. A.: Current status of research and theory in human problem solving. Psychol. Bull. 66, 36–54 (1966).
de Charms, R., Prafulachandra, N. D.: Hope of success, fear of failure, subjective probability, and risk-taking behavior. J. pers. soc. Psychol. 1, 558–568 (1965).
Dember, W. N.: Alternation behavior. In: Fiske, D. W., Maddi, S. R. (Eds.), Functions of varied experience. Homeward (Ill.) Dorsey 1961.
—, Fowler, H.: Spontaneous alternation behavior. Psychol. Bull. 55, 412–428 (1958).
Drever, J.: A dictionary of psychology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin 1964.
Edwards, W.: Probability preferences in gambling. Amer. J. Psychol. 66, 349–364 (1953).
—: Methods for computing uncertainties. Amer. J. Psychol. 67, 164–170 (1954a).
Edwards, W.: Probability preferences among bets with differing expected values. Amer. J. Psychol. 67, 56–67 (1954b).
—: The reliability of probability preferences. Amer. J. Psychol. 67, 68–95 (1954c).
—: The theory of decision making. Psychol. Bull. 51, 380–417 (1954d).
Eysenck, H. J.: Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul, 1947.
—: Cortical inhibition, figural after effect, and theory of personality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 51, 94–106 (1955).
—: The structure of human personality, Third Ed. London: Methuen 1970.
—, Levey, A.: Alternation in choice behavior and extraversion. Life Sci. 4, 115–119 (1965).
Fattu, N. A., Mech, E., Kapos, E.: Some statistical relationships between selected response dimensions and problem-solving efficiency. Psychol. Monogr. 68, No. 6 (1954).
—, Kapos, E., Mech, E. V.: Response “predictability” in a complex multiple choice situation. J. gen. Psychol. 54, 263–270 (1956).
Festinger, L.: Studies in decision: I. Decision-time, relative frequency of judgment and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus differences. J. exp. Psychol. 32, 291–301 (1943).
Fiske, D. W., Maddi, S. R. (Eds.): Functions of varied experience. Homeward (Ill.) Dorsey 1961.
—, Rice, L.: Intra-individual variability. Psychol. Bull. 52, 217–250 (1955).
Ghiselli, E. E.: The prediction of predictability. Educ. Psychol. Measurement 20, 3–8 (1960).
Glanzer, M.: The role of stimulus satiation in spontaneous alternation. J. exp. Psychol. 45, 387–393 (1953a).
—: Stimulus satiation: An explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 560, 257–268 (1953b).
Goldsmith, R. W.: Persönlichkeitsspezifische Komponenten des Entscheidungsverhaltens. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin 1967.
—: Persönlichkeitsspezifische Komponenten des Entscheidungsverhaltens. I. Beziehungen zwischen der Interferenzneigung und dem Entscheidungsverhalten. (Personality components of decision making. I. Relationships between decisionmaking behavior and interference proneness.) Psychol. Forsch. 32, 135–168 (1968).
Goldstone, S.: Variability of temporal judgment: intersensory comparisons and sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills 26, 211–215 (1968).
Guilford, J. P.: The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill 1967.
Hackl, H.: Untersuchungen zur Variabilität des Verhaltens bei Normalen und Schizophrenen. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Vienna 1967.
Hebb, D. O.: The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley 1949.
—: Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). Psychol. Rev. 62, 243–254 (1955).
Holman, E. W.: Tests for spontaneous alternation. Psychol. Rev. 72, 427–436 (1966).
Hörmann, H.: Konflikt und Entscheidung. Göttingen: Hogrefe 1960.
Hull, C. L.: Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1943.
Irwin, F. W., Smith, W. A. S., Mayfield, J. F.: Tests of two theories of decision in an “expanded judgment” situation. J. exp. Psychol. 51, 261–268 (1956).
— —: Further tests of theories of decision in an “expanded judgment” situation. J. exp. Psychol. 52, 345–348 (1956).
— —: Value, cost, and information as determiners of decision. J. exp. Psychol. 54, 229–232 (1957).
Klix, F.: Psychophysik kognitiver Prozesse. In: Marko, H., Färber, G. (Eds.), Kybernetik 1968 (Report of Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kybernetik, München 1968). München: Oldenbourg 1968.
Kogan, N., Wallach, M. A.: Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1964.
Kubie, L. S.: The repetitive core of neurosis. Psychoanal. Quart. 10, 23–43 (1941).
—: The fundamental nature of the distinction between normality and neurosis. Psychoanal. Quart. 23, 167–204 (1954).
Lippmann, W.: Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1922.
Liverant, S., Scodel, A.: Internal and external control as determinants of decision making under conditions of risk. Psychol. Rep. 7, 59–67 (1960).
Maddi, S. R.: Personality theories. A comparative analysis. Homewood (Ill.): Dorsey 1968.
Miller, G. A.: Free recall of redundant strings of digits. J. exp. Psychol. 56, 485–491 (1958).
—, Frick, F. C.: Statistical behavioristics and sequences of responses. Psychol. Rev. 56, 311–324 (1949).
Mittenecker, E.: Die Analyse „zufälliger“ Reaktionsfolgen. Z. exp. angew. Psychol. 5, 45–60 (1958).
Montgomery, K. C.: Exploratory behavior and its relation to spontaneous alternation in a series of maze exposures. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 45, 50–57 (1952a).
—: A test of two explanations of spontaneous alternation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 45, 287–295 (1952b).
Newman, E. B.: Computational methods useful in analyzing series of binary data. Amer. J. Psychol. 64, 252–262 (1951).
Ramsey, R. W., Broadhurst, A.: The non-randomness of attempts at random responses: Relationships with personality variables and psychiatric disorder. Brit. J. Psychol. 59, 299–304 (1968).
Rupprecht, A.: Variabilität des Verhaltens und Intelligenz bei Normalen und Neurotikern. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Vienna 1957.
Saunders, D. R.: Moderator variables in prediction. Educ. Psychol. Measurement 16, 209–222 (1956).
Schellenberg, J. A.: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Random House 1970.
Schultz, D. P.: Spontaneous alternation behavior in humans. Psychol. Bull. 62, 394–400 (1964).
Shannon, C. E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948). Reprinted in Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication. Urban: The University of Illinois Press 19549.
Siegel, S.: Theoretical models of choice and strategy behavior: Stable state behavior in the two-choice uncertain outcome situation. Psychometrika 24, 303–316 (1959).
Simon, H. A.: Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Amer. Economic Rev. 3, 253–283 (1959).
Smith, G. J. W., Klein, G. S.: Cognitive controls in serial behavior patterns. J. Personality 22, 188–213 (1953).
Stroop, J. R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. exp. Psychol. 18, 643–661 (1935).
Tune, G. S.: Response preferences: a review of some relevant literature. Psychol. Bull. 61, 286–302 (1964).
Tversky, A.: Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev. 76, 31–48 (1969).
Walker, E. L.: The duration and course of the reaction decrement and the influence of reward. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 49, 167–176 (1956).
—, Dember, W. N., Earl, R. W., Karoly, A. J.: Choice alternation: I. Stimulus vs. place vs. response. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 19–23 (1955a).
— — —, Fliege, S. W., Karoly, A. J.: Choice alternation: II. Exposure to stimulus und place without choice. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 24–28 (1955b).
— — —, Fawl, C. L., Karoly, A. J., Choice alternation: III. Response intensity vs. response discriminability. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 1955, 80–85 (1955c).
Weiss, R. L.: On producing random responses. Psychol. Rep. 14, 931–941 (1964).
Worell, L.: Intraindividual instability and conflict. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 66, 480–488 (1963).
Zeaman, D., House, B. J.: The growth and decay of reactive inhibition as measured by alternation behavior. J. exp. Psychol. 41, 177–186 (1951).
Zeblewski, E.: Die Anwendbarkeit des Perseverationstests von Mittenecker für die Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik. Z. exp. angew. Psychol. 6, 310–320 (1959).
Zlotowski, M.: Behavioral differences between process and reactive schizophrenics in a monotonous repetitive task. J. pers. soc. Psychol. 1, 240–244 (1965).
—, Bakan, P.: Behavioral variability of process and reactive schizophrenics in a binary guessing task. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 66, 185–187 (1963).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldsmith, R.W. Personality components of decision making. Psychol. Forsch. 35, 187–212 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542690
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542690