Marine Biology

, Volume 101, Issue 4, pp 529–534 | Cite as

Excess amylase in Gammarus palustris (Crustacea: Amphipoda); its release into and possible roles in the environment

  • R. Borowsky
  • M. M. Guarna


Gammarus palustris Bousfield (1969) individuals, of both sexes, contain levels of amylase activity sufficient to hydrolyze their dry weight in starch in less than an hour. We suggest that this is in excess of their needs for internal digestion. Experiments show that amylase is released by the amphipod into the environment, especially when they are maintained in the presence of food. Gammarus palustris amylase can be recovered from their natural habitat. The enzymes retain activity over the wide salinity range (5 to 30‰) encountered by this species in nature. It is hypothesized that released amylase plays a role external to the amphipod, perhaps in predigestion of food, perhaps as an aid in finding food.


Enzyme Starch Amylase Natural Habitat Amylase Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alexander, M. (1977). Introduction to Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernfeld, P. (1955). Amylases, alpha and beta. Methods in Enzymology 1: 149–158Google Scholar
  3. Borowsky, R. (1984). Environmental control of amylase phenotype in amphipods of the genus Gammarus. Biol. Bull. mar. bio. Lab., Woods Hole 167: 647–657Google Scholar
  4. Borowsky, R., Borowsky, B., Milani, H., Greenberg, P. (1985). Amylase variation in the salt marsh amphipod, Gammarus palustris. Genetics 111: 311–323Google Scholar
  5. Borowsky, R., Borowsky, B. (1987). Feeding by the salt marsh amphipod. Gammarus palustris, on Enteromorpha and Ulva. Am. Zool. 27: 55AGoogle Scholar
  6. Borowsky, R., Borowsky, B. (1988). Carbohydrate feeding preferences of Gammarus amphipods. Am. Zool. 28: 28AGoogle Scholar
  7. Bousfield, E. L. (1969). New records of Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipod) from the Middle Atlantic Region. Chesapeake Science 10: 1–17Google Scholar
  8. Bousfield, E. L. (1973). Shallow-water gammaridean amphipoda of New England. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  9. Dygert, S., Li, L. H., Florida, D., Thoma, J. A. (1965) Determination of reducing sugar with improved precision. Analyt. Biochem. 13: 367Google Scholar
  10. Gable, M. A., Croker, R. A. (1977). The salt marsh amphipod, Gammarus palustris Bousfield, 1969 at the northern limit of its distribution. Estuar. cstl. mar. Sci. 5: 123–134Google Scholar
  11. Gillespie, J. H., Kojima, K. (1968). The degree of polymorphisms in enzymes involved in energy production compared to that in nonspecific enzymes in two Drosophila ananassae populations. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 61: 582–585Google Scholar
  12. Haj-Ahmad, Y., Hickey, D. (1982). A molecular explanation of frequency-dependent selection in Drosophila. Nature, Lond. 299: 350–352Google Scholar
  13. Hoppe, H-G. (1983). Significance of exoenzymatic activities in the ecology of brackish water: measurements by means of methylumbelliferyl-substrates. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 11: 299–308Google Scholar
  14. Karn, R. C., Malacinski, G. M. (1978). The comparative biochemistry, physiology, and genetics of animal alpha-amylases. Adv. Comp. Physiol. Biochem. 7: 1–103Google Scholar
  15. Kaestner, A. (1970). Invertebrate Zoology, Vol III. The Crustacea. Interscience Publishers, John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, A. L. (1966). Feeding and digestion in two intertidal gammarids: marinogammarus obtusatus and M. pirloti. J. Zool. 148: 515–525Google Scholar
  17. Meeuse, J. D., Kreger, D. R. (1954). On the nature of floridean starch and Ulva starch. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 13: 593–595Google Scholar
  18. Meeuse, J. D., Kreger, D. R. (1959). X-ray diffraction of algal starches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 35: 26–32Google Scholar
  19. Meeuse, J. D., Smith, B. N. (1962). A note on the amylolytic breakdown of some raw algal starches. Planta 57: 624–635Google Scholar
  20. Peterson, G. L. (1983). Determination of total protein. Meth. Emzym. 91: 95–119Google Scholar
  21. Robson, C. M. (1979). Purification and the properties of the digestive amylase of Asellus aquaticus (L.) (Crustacea, Isopoda). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 62B: 501–505Google Scholar
  22. Robyt, J. F., French, D. (1963). Action pattern and specificity of an amylase from Bacillus subtilis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 100: 451–467Google Scholar
  23. Smith, I. (1968). Disc electrophoresis on acrylamide gels; techniques of disc electrophoresis. In: Smith, I. (ed.) Chromatographic and electrophoretic techniques, Vol. 2. Interscience Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Borowsky
    • 1
  • M. M. Guarna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations