Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 23–31 | Cite as

Disturbance and predation in an assemblage of herbivorous Diptera and algae on rocky shores

  • Carlos Robles
Article

Summary

Speculation about the effects of disturbance in marine benthic communities is often based on competition theory. Disturbances are thought to “provision” numerically depleted or competitively inferior species with resources associated with open substrate. However, disturbances that remove entire assemblages of sessile species also alter trophic structure, and thereby, influence the outcome of predator/prey relations. Aspects of community structure may be determined by patterns of disturbance and predation.

The influence of disturbance and predation on the distribution and seasonality of blooms of ephemeral algae and associated Diptera was investigated with field experiments at several rocky beaches in central California. Blooms of ephemeral algae developed on high intertidal rock faces that were subject to severe seasonal disturbances caused by shifting sediment. These were subsequently colonized by the herbivorous larvae of several Diptera species for predictable periods each year. Other areas, without blooms, were not so disturbed.

Experiments were done to determine if seasonal blooms were caused by seasonal disturbances that remove predators which otherwise might prevent the establishment of the Diptera/algae assemblage. The predators were crabs and limpets which eat both algae and larvae while foraging. Blooms of algae and larvae did not develop when limpets were transplanted to disturbed areas in periods between disturbances. Adjacent control areas did support blooms. Transplanted limpets did not survive periods of burial. When both limpets and crabs were excluded from treatment plots in undisturbed areas, blooms developed where they would not otherwise have occurred; controls remaied unchanged. Crabs and limpets differed in their effects on this assemblage. Crabs recruited quickly to the site of a bloom, but did not crop algal cover as closely, nor decrease larval density as much as the slowly recruiting limpets.

The results suggest that disturbances favor blooms of some species by reducing predation. Severe localized disturbances increased the variability of the upper shore community by creating a patchwork of differing predator/prey abundances.

Keywords

Rocky Shore Larval Density Algal Cover Undisturbed Area Competition Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott IA, Hollenberg GJ (1976) Marine algae of California. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleem AA (1950) Distribution and ecology of British marine littoral diatoms. J. of Ecol 38:75–106Google Scholar
  3. Bascom W (1964) Waves and beaches: The dynamics of the ocean surface. Anchor, Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrens S (1971) The distribution and abundance of the intertidal prosobranch, Littorina scutulata (Gould 1899) and L. sitkana (Philippi 1845). M.S. thesis, Univ of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  5. Castenholz RW (1961) The effect of grazing on marine littoral diatom populations. Ecol 42:783–794Google Scholar
  6. Choat JH (1977) The influence of sessile organisms on the population biology of Acimeid limpets. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 26:1–26Google Scholar
  7. Connell JH (1971) On the rote of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and rainforest trees. In PJ den Boer and GR Gradwell editors, Dynamics of Populations, Center for Agricultural Publications and Documentations, Wageningen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell JH (1973) Population ecology of reef building corals, pp 205–245. In OA Jones and R. Endean, editors, Biology and geology of coral reefs, Vol 2, Biology 1. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310Google Scholar
  10. Conway E, Mumford TF Jr, Scagel RF (1976) The genus Porphyra in British Columbia and Washington, Syesis: 185–244Google Scholar
  11. Cubit J (1975) Interactions of seasonally changing physical factors and grazing affecting high intertidal communities on a rocky shore. Ph.D. thesis, Univ of Oregon, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushing DH (1975) Marine Ecology and Fisheries. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly MA, Mathieson AC (1977) The effect of sand movement on intertidal seaweeds and selected invertebrates at Bound Rock, New Hampshire Mar Biol 43:45–55Google Scholar
  14. Dayton PK (1970) Competition, predation and community structure: the allocation and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ph.D. thesis. Univ of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent use of the rocky intertidal. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389Google Scholar
  16. Dayton PK, Robilliard GA, Paine RT, Dayton ZB (1970) Benthic faunal zonation as a result of anchor ice at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In: Holdgate MW (ed) Antarctic Ecology, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank PW (1965) The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. Ecol 46:831–844Google Scholar
  18. Glynn PW (1976) Some physical and biological determinants of coral community structure in the Eastern Pacific. Ecol Monogr 46:431–456Google Scholar
  19. Grigg RW, Maragos GE (1974) Diversity and colonization of Hawaiian coral reefs. Ecol 55:387Google Scholar
  20. Hiatt RM (1948) The biology of the lined shore crab, Pachygrapsus crassipes. Pacific Science 2:135–213Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson GE (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecol 32:571–577Google Scholar
  22. Johnson DS, Skutch AF (1928) Littoral vegetation on a headland of Mt. Desert Island, Maine. I. Submersible or strictly littoral vegetation. Ecol 9:188–215Google Scholar
  23. Johnstone J (1908) Conditions of Life in the Sea. Cambridge Univ Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitching JA (1937) Studies in sublittoral ecology. II. Recolonization at the upper margin of the sublittoral region; with a note on the denudation of Laminaria forests by storms. J of Ecol 25:482–495Google Scholar
  25. Komar PD (1976) Beach Processes and Sedimentation. Prentice-Hall Inc. New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawson GW (1957) Seasonal variation of the intertidal zonation on the coast of Ghana in relation to tidal factors. J Ecol 45:831–860Google Scholar
  27. Leonard SD (1972) The natural history of Paraclunio alaskensis and Paraclunio trilobatus (Diptera, Chironomidae), two intertidal flies. M.S. thesis Humbolt State College, HumboltGoogle Scholar
  28. Levin S, Paine RT (1974) Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc Nat Acad Sci Vol 71, pp 2744–2747Google Scholar
  29. Loya Y (1976) Recolonization of Red Sea corals affected by natural catastrophies and man-made perturbations. Ecol 57:278–289Google Scholar
  30. Lubchenco J (1980) Algal zonation in the New England rocky intertidal community: an experimental analysis. Ecol 61:333–344Google Scholar
  31. Lubchenco J, Cubit J (1980) Heteromorphic life histories of certain marine algae as adaptations to variations in herbivory. Ecol 61:676–687Google Scholar
  32. Menge BA (1978) Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community: relation between predator foraging activity and environmental harshness. Oecol 34:1–16Google Scholar
  33. Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1976) Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition and temporal heterogeneity. Amer Nat 110:351–369Google Scholar
  34. Morely RH, Ring RA (1972) Intertital Chironomidae (diptera) of British Columbia: II. Life history and population dynamics. Can Ent 104:1099–1121Google Scholar
  35. Nicotri ME (1974) Resource partitioning, grazing activities, and influence on the microflora by intertidal limpets. Ph.D. thesis. Univ of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  36. Paine RT, Levin SA (1981) Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol Monogr 51:145–173Google Scholar
  37. Ricketts RF, Calvin J (1972) Between Pacific Tides. 4th ed. J Hedgpeth (ed). Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Rützler K (1970) Spatial competition among Porifera: solution by epizoism. Oecol 5:85–95Google Scholar
  39. Robles CD (1979) Disturbance and the interactions of herbivorous diptera with their resources, competitors, and predators on rocky shores. Ph.D. thesis. Univ of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  40. Robles CD, Cubit JD (1981) Influence of biotic factors in an upper intertidal community: effects of grazing diptera larvae on algae. Ecol 62:1536–1547Google Scholar
  41. Saunders LG (1928) Some marine insects of the Pacific Coast of Canada. Ann Ent Soc Amer 21:521–531Google Scholar
  42. Sommerfeld MR, Nichols HW (1970) Developmental and cytological studies of Bangia fuscopurpurea in culture. Amer J Bot 57:640–648Google Scholar
  43. Sousa WP (1979) Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the non-equilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecol 60:1225–1239Google Scholar
  44. Southward AJ (1956) The population balance between limpets and seaweeds on wave-beaten rocky shores. Rept Mar Biol Sta Port Evin 68:20–29Google Scholar
  45. Southward AJ (1964) Limpet grazing and the control of vegetation on rocky shores. In: Crisp DJ (ed) Grazing in terrestrial and marine environments. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Stoddart DR (1972) Catastrophic damage to coral reef communities by earthquake. Nature 239:51–52Google Scholar
  47. Woodin SA (1978) Refuges, disturbance, and community structure: a marine soft-bottom example. Ecol 59:274–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Robles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations