Abstract
In moral dilemmas, where circumstances prevent two or more equally justified prima facie ethical requirements from being fulfilled, it is often maintained that, since the agent cannot do both, conjoint obligation is overridden by Kant's principle that ‘ought’ implies ‘can’, but that the agent nevertheless has a disjunctive obligation to perform one of the otherwise obligatory actions or the other. Against this commonly received view, it is demonstrated that although Kant's ought-can principle may avoid logical inconsistency, the principle is incompatible with disjunctive obligation in standard deontic logic, and that it entails paradoxically that none of the conflicting dilemma actions will in fact occur. The principle appears to provide the only plausible safeguard against deontic antinomy, but cannot be admitted because of its collision with considered moral judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Al-Hibri, Aziza: 1978, Deontic Logic: A Comprehensive Appraisal and a New Proposal, University Press of America, Washington, D. C.
Burks, Arthur W.: 1977, Chance, Cause, Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Scientific Evidence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1975, Thinking and Doing: The Philosophical Foundations of Institutions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1981, ‘The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in One Fell Swoop’, in Hilpinen (ed.), pp. 37–85.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1982, ‘The Logical Structure of Legal Systems: A New Perspective’, in Martino (ed.), Vol. II, pp. 21–31.
Conee, Earl: 1982, ‘Against Moral Dilemmas’, The Philosophical Review 91, 87–97.
DeCew, Judith Wagner: 1981, ‘Conditional Obligation and Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10, 55–72.
Donagan, Alan: 1984, ‘Consistency in Rationalist Moral Systems’, The Journal of Philosophy 81, 291–309.
Fitch, Frederick B.: 1952, Symbolic Logic, Ronald Press, New York.
Hilpinen, Risto (ed.): 1971, Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Hilpinen, Risto (ed.): 1981, New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1971, ‘Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic’, in Hilpinen (ed.), pp. 59–104.
Hughes, G. E. and M. J. Cresswell: 1972, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen & Co., London.
Kant, Immanuel: 1965 [1787], Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by N. K. Smith, St. Martin's Press, New York.
Kant, Immanuel: 1969 [1785], Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. L. W. Beck (ed.), R. P. Wolff, Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.
Marcus, Ruth Barcan: 1980, ‘Moral Dilemmas and Consistency’, The Journal of Philosophy 77, 121–36.
Martino, A. A. (ed.): 1982, Deontic Logic Computational Linguistics, and Legal Information Systems, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Ross, Alf: 1941, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7, 53–71.
Ross, W. D.: 1930, The Right and the Good, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ross, W. D.: 1939, The Foundations of Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1972, ‘The Logic of Conditional Obligation’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 417–38.
Van Fraassen, Bas C.: 1973, ‘Values and the Heart's Command’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 5–19.
Von Wright, G. H.: 1951, ‘Deontic Logic’, Mind 60, 1–15.
Von Wright, G. H.: 1963, Norm and Action: A Logical Inquiry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Von Wright, G. H.: 1968, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Von Wright, G. H.: 1971, ‘A New System of Deontic Logic’, in Hilpinen (ed.), pp. 105–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacquette, D. Moral dilemmas, disjunctive obligations, and Kant's principle that ‘ought’ implies ‘can’. Synthese 88, 43–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540092
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540092
Keywords
- Moral Judgment
- Prima Facie
- Moral Dilemma
- Deontic Logic
- Ethical Requirement