Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 101–119 | Cite as

Accounting for context: Future directions in bioethics theory and research

  • Darleen Douglas-Steele
  • Edward M. Hundert
Article

Abstract

Many physicians have found that the traditional approach to bioethics fails to account for important aspects of their moral experience in practice. New approaches to bioethics theory are challenging the traditional application of universal moral principles based in liberal moral theory. At the same time, a shift in both the goals and methods of bioethics education has accompanied its “coming of age” in the medical school curriculum. Taken together, these changes challenge both bioethics educators and theorists to come closer to the details and nuances of real clinical encounters. The emerging trend emphasizes the importance of context in bioethics education and in the moral theory and research under-girding it. This article introduces one research approach examining the practical life contexts of medical students' ethical experiences and learning. It calls for increased attention to research and theory in bioethics that more adequately accounts for the ways different contexts produce significant changes in meaning and understanding in medical encounters.

Key words

bioethics bioethics education bioethics research context ethnomethodology meaning and understanding in medical encounters medical interviewing moral theory practical reasoning qualitative research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miles SH, Lane LW, Bickel J, Walker RM, Cassel CK. Medical ethics education: Coming of age. Acad Med 1989;64:705–714.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pellegrino ED. Teaching medical ethics: Some persistent questions and some responses. Acad Med 1989;64:701–703.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singer PA, Cohen R, Robb A, Rothman A. The ethics structured clinical examination. Gen Intern Med 1993;8:23–28.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miles et al.: 705.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharpe VA. Justice and care: The implications of the Kohlberg-Gilligan debate for medical ethics. Theor Med 1993;13:295–318.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hundert EM, Douglas-Steele DK. Accounting for context in bioethics education: The informal ethics curriculum. Medical Education; in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miles et al.:Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Pellegrino.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bresnahan JF, Hunter KM. Ethics education at Northwestern University Medical School. Acad Med 1989;64:701–703.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wartman SA, Brock DW. The development of a medical ethics curriculum in a general internal medicine residency program. Acad Med 1989;64:751–754.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Callahan D. Current trends in biomedical ethics in the United States. Bull of Pan Am Health Organ 1990;24:530–535.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnard D, Clouser KD. Teaching medical ethics in its contexts: Penn State College of Medicine. Acad Med 1989;64:745.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wear S. The irreducibly clinical character of bioethics. J Med Philos 1991;16:53–70.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singer et al.: 23.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bresnahan and Hunter.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonsen AR. Medical ethics teaching programs at the University of California, San Francisco, and the University of Washington. Acad Med 1989;64:719.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibid.: 718–722.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hundert and Douglas-Steele.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bresnahan and Hunter.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomasma DC, Marshall P. The clinical medical humanities program at Loyola University of Chicago. Acad Med 1989;64:735–739.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medio F, Wilkerson L, Lesky L, Borkan S. Integrating teaching and patient care. In: Edwards JC, Marier RL, eds. Clinical Teaching for Medical Residents. New York, NY: Springer, 1988: 214–227.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bickel: 18.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miles et al.: 708.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bickel J. Medical students' professional ethics: defining the problems and developing the resources. Acad Med 1991;66:726–729.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Callahan: 530–531.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibid: 531–532.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Ibid.: 68.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid.: 64.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carse A. The ‘voice of care’: Implications for bioethical education. J Med Philos 1991;16:5–28.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987: 24. In Carse: 8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miller JB. Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arras JD. Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics. J Med Philos, 1991;16:30.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jonsen AR. Casuistry and clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 1989;7:65–74.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jonsen AR. Casuistry. In: Childrenss JF, Macgvariiee J, eds. Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics. Philadelphia, PA: Wesminster Press, 1989: 78–80.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jonsen AR. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics. Theor Med 1991;12:295–307.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toulmin SE. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Toulmin SE. The tyranny of principles. Hastings Cent Rep 1981;11:31–39.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Toulmin SE. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspect Bio Med 1982;25:736–750.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jonsen AR, Toulmin SE. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
    Mishler EG. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mishler EG. The analysis of interview narratives. In: Sarbin TR, ed., Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bamberg M. Voices of curing and caring: The role of vagueness and ambiguity in informed consent discussions. Family Systems Medicine 1991;9:329–342.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Budwig N. The conduit metaphor: Language and informed consent. Family Systems Medicine 1991;9:313–327.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Charon R. Narrating the patient. Paper presented at the Narrative Group of the Massachusetts Interdisciplinary Discourse Analysis Seminar's Conference at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, March 1992.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jonsen, Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 297.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jonsen and Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jonsen, Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 297.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Arras: 30–31.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jonsen. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 298.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jonsen and Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jonsen. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 297.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    See Toulmin. The Uses of Argument.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jonsen. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 301.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wittgenstein L. Zettel. (2nd ed.) Anscombe GEM, Wright GHV, eds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jonsen. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics: 301.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ibid: 305.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Carse. The ‘voice of care.’Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ibid.: 18.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gilligan 22–23.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wittgenstein. Zettel.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wittgenstein L. On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Carse: 11.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Carse: 11–12.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mishler EG. Meaning in context: Is there any other kind? Harvard Educational Review 1979;49:1–19.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
  76. 76.
  77. 77.
    Mishler. The Discourse of Medicine.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mishler EG, Clark JA, Ingelfinger J, Simon MP. The language of attentive patient care: A comparison of two medical interviews. Gen Intern Med 1989;4:325–335.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Charon. Narrating the patient.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hunter KM. Doctors' Stories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Austin JL. How To Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University press, 1962.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Louch AR. Explanation and Human Action. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Winch P. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wittgenstein. Zettel.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wittgenstein. On Certainty.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wittgenstein L. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vols. 1 and 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    For thoroughgoing critiques of the computational model of thought and thinking see Budwig, and especially Coulter J. Recognition in Wittgenstein and contemporary thought. In: Chapman M, Dixon RA, eds. Meaning and the Growth of Understanding: Wittgenstein's Significance for Developmental Psychology. Berlin, W. Germany: Springer Verlag, 1987: 85–102.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Budwig. The conduit metaphor: Language and informed consent.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ibid.: 325.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bamberg. Voices of curing and caring.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ibid.: 332.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ibid.: 338.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sacks H. Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In: Psathas G, ed. Everday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers, 1979: 7–14.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Carse. The ‘voice of care.’Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darleen Douglas-Steele
    • 1
  • Edward M. Hundert
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Student Affairs and Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations