Advertisement

Biophysics of structure and mechanism

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 231–256 | Cite as

Folding and association of proteins

  • R. Jaenicke
Review

Abstract

The acquisition of the native three-dimensional structure of proteins consists of sequential folding reactions with well-populated and well-defined structural intermediates. For small proteins successive stages in the folding have been resolved kinetically; these suggest that H-bonded elements of secondary structure are formed first, followed by folding steps to generate the complete tertiary structure.

The rate determining step in the folding of a number of small proteins has been shown to be proline cis ⇌ tram isomerization. As indicated by experiments using fast kinetics the overall folding mechanism, even in a small single-domain molecule like ribonuclease, involves more than one intermediate.

Large protein molecules contain domains which may fold independently. For multi-domain proteins, the pathway of folding therefore involves “folding by parts”, followed by merging of folded domains.

In the case of assembly systems (e.g., oligomeric or multimeric enzymes) folding and association have to be subtly interconnected with respect to the time scale, since the correct assembly of subunits requires their proper folding. In this sense the initial function of oligomeric proteins is their own self-assembly. The corresponding mechanism underlying the spontaneous formation of the native quaternary structure of oligomeric proteins must be the consecutive folding and association of the constituent polypeptide chains.

Equilibrium and kinetic studies have been concerned with a number of dimeric, tetrameric and multimeric enzymes, using enzymatic activity to measure structure formation: alcohol dehydrogenase, aldolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactic dehydrogenase, malic dehydrogenase, pyruvate dehydrogenase, triose phosphate isomerase, tryptophan synthase.

These experiments make use of the reversibility of protein denaturation, focusing on refolding and reassociation rather than folding and association, because there is no direct approach to structural investigations of the nascent polypeptide chain in vivo.

Optimum conditions of reconstitution yield up to 100% reactivation. After separation of “irreversibly denatured protein”, reconstituted and native protein turn out to be indistinguishable. The major side reaction leading to “wrong aggregation” is due to competition between folding and association.

Due to the high specificity of the association reaction “chimeric” species are not observed, and multimeric systems containing different component enzymes show specific assembly.

The kinetics of reconstitution generally obey an irreversible sequential first- order/second-order mechanism involving inactive monomers; only in the case of aldolase is subunit activity suggested. For a number of oligomeric enzymes renaturation from various denaturants, in the absence or presence of coenzyme is characterized by identical kinetics. For glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, however, free NAD as well as a covalently bound NAD-analog are found to enhance the reconstitution.

In the case of assembly structures exceeding the dimer, the observed consecutive folding/association mechanism does not allow us to decide whether the observed second order processes belong to the formation of the dimer or tetramer. Chemical cross-linking and hybridization techniques allow the equilibrium state and the assembly kinetics of oligomeric systems to be analyzed quantitatively. Using this method, e.g., for lactic dehydrogenase, it is obvious that dissociation leads to the homogeneous monomer, while tetramer formation is found to parallel reactivation.

In general, equilibrium and kinetic experiments prove that full enzymatic activity requires association.

In the case of multisubunit enzymes (multienzyme complexes) heterologous interactions of the component enzymes seem to be involved in the rate determining (first order) “reshuffling” processes which generate catalytic activity in the overall enzymatic reaction.

Key words

Association Folding Oligomeric enzymes Proteins Reconstitution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams B, Burgess RJ, Carrey EA, Mackintosh IR, Mitchinson C, Thomas RM, Pain RH (1980) The role of folding units in the kinetic folding of globular proteins. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 447–467Google Scholar
  2. Anfinsen CB, Schechter AN, Taniuchi H (1971) Some aspects of the structure of staphylococcal nuclease: Part II. Studies in solution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant Biol 36:249–255Google Scholar
  3. Anfinsen CB, Scheraga HA (1975) Experimental and theoretical aspects of protein folding. Adv Protein Chem 29:205–300Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin RL (1975) Intermediates in protein folding reactions and the mechanism of protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 44:453–475Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin RL (1980) The mechanism of folding of RNase A and S. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 369–385Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin RL, Creighton TE (1980) Recent experimental work on the pathway and mechanism of protein folding. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 217–260Google Scholar
  7. Barksdale AD, Stuehr JE (1972) Kinetics of the helix-coil transition in aqueous poly (L-glutamic acid). J Am Chem Soc 94:3334–3338Google Scholar
  8. Bartholmes P, Jaenicke R (1978) Reassociation and reactivation of yeast GAPDH after dissociation in the presence of ATP. Eur J Biochem 87:563–567Google Scholar
  9. Bernhardt G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1981) Reassociation of LDH from pig heart studied by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. Z Naturforsch 36c:772–777Google Scholar
  10. Bierzynski A, Kim PS, Baldwin RL (1982) A salt bridge stabilizes the helix formed by the isolated C-peptide of RNase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Brandts JF, Brennan M, Lin L-N (1977) Unfolding and refolding occur much faster for a proline-free protein than for most proline-containing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:4178–4181Google Scholar
  12. Brandts JF, Halvorson HR, Brennan M (1975) Consideration of the possibility that the slow step in protein denaturation reactions is due to cis-trans isomerism of proline residues. Biochemistry 14:4953–4963Google Scholar
  13. Butler PJG, Durham ACH (1977) TMV protein aggregation and the virus assembly. Adv Protein Chem 31:187–251Google Scholar
  14. Chan WW-C (1970) Matrix-bound protein subunits. Biophys Biochem Res Commun 41:1198–1204Google Scholar
  15. Cook RA, Koshland DE Jr (1969) Specificity in the assembly of multisubunit proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64:247–254Google Scholar
  16. Creighton TE (1980) Experimental elucidation of pathways of protein unfolding and refolding. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 427–446Google Scholar
  17. Creighton TE, Pain RH (1980) Unfolding and refolding of staphylococcus aureus penicillinase by urea-gradient electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 137:431–436Google Scholar
  18. Dautry-Varsat A, Garel J-R (1981) Independent folding regions in AKH dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 20:1396–1401Google Scholar
  19. Garel J-R, Dautry-Varsat A (1980a) The formation of the native structure in the bifunctional enzymes AKH DHI and II from E.coli K 12 and in some of their monofunctional fragments. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 485–499Google Scholar
  20. Garel J-R, Dautry-Varsat A (1980b) Sequential folding of a bifunctional allosteric protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3379–3383Google Scholar
  21. Gerschitz J, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1978) Refolding and reactivation of L-ADH after dissociation and denaturation in 6 M guanidine · HCl. Eur J Biochem 87:591–599Google Scholar
  22. Girg R, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1981) Limited proteolysis of porcine muscle LDH by thermolysin during reconstitution yields dimers. Eur J Biochem 119:301–305Google Scholar
  23. Goldberg ME, Zetina CR (1980) Importance of interdomain interactions in the structure, function and stability of the F1 domains from the Β2 subunit of E. coli TSase. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 469–484Google Scholar
  24. Groha C, Bartholmes P, Jaenicke R (1978) Refolding and reactivation of E.coli TSase Β2 subunit after inactivation and dissociation in guanidine. HC1 at acidic pH. Eur J Biochem 92:437–441Google Scholar
  25. Gruenewald B, Nicola CU, Lustig A, Schwarz G, Klump H (1979) Kinetics of the helix-coil transition of a polypeptide with non-ionic side groups, derived from ultrasonic relaxation measurements. Biophys Chem 9:137–147Google Scholar
  26. Hammes GG, Roberts PB (1969) Dynamics of the helix-coil transition in poly-l-ornithine. J Am Chem Soc 91:1812–1816Google Scholar
  27. Hermann R, Jaenicke R, Rudolph R (1981) Analysis of the reconstitution of oligomeric enzymes by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde: Kinetics of reassociation of LDH. Biochemistry 20:5195–5201Google Scholar
  28. Jaenicke R (1974) Reassociation and reactivation of LDH from the unfolded subunits. Eur J Biochem 46:149–155Google Scholar
  29. Jaenicke R (1978) Folding and association of oligomeric enzymes. Naturwissenschaften 65:569–577Google Scholar
  30. Jaenicke R (1980) Protein Folding, Proc 28th Conf German Biochem Soc Regensburg, Sept. 10–12, 1979. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam New York, p 587Google Scholar
  31. Jaenicke R (1981) Enzymes under extremes of physical conditions. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 10:1–67Google Scholar
  32. Jaenicke R, Krebs H, Rudolph R, Woenckhaus C (1980) Rate enhancement of reconstitution of GAPDH by covalently bound coenzyme analog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1966–1969Google Scholar
  33. Jaenicke R, Lauffer MA (1969) Polymerization-depolymerization of TMV-protein. XII. Further studies on the role of water. Biochemistry 8:3083–3092Google Scholar
  34. Jaenicke R, Perham RN (1982) Reconstitution of PDH from B. stear. Biochemistry (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Jaenicke R, Rudolph R (1980) Folding and association of oligomeric enzymes. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 525–548Google Scholar
  36. Jaenicke R, Rudolph R, Heider I (1981a) Specificity in the subunit assembly of oligomeric enzymes: Synchronous reconstitution of mammalian LDH and MDH. Biochem Int 2:23–31Google Scholar
  37. Jaenicke R, Vogel W, Rudolph R (1981b) Dimeric intermediates in the dissociation of LDH. Eur J Biochem 114:525–531Google Scholar
  38. Kim PS, Baldwin RL (1982) Specific intermediates in the folding reactions of small proteins and the mechanism of protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Kellenberger E (1966) Control mechanisms in bacteriophage morphopoiesis. CIBA Foundation Symp, pp 192–228Google Scholar
  40. Labhardt AM (1980) Equilibrium and kinetic stages in the folding of RNase S. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 401–425Google Scholar
  41. Labhardt AM, Baldwin RL (1979) Recombination of S-peptide with S-protein during folding of RNase S. J Mol Biol 135:245–254Google Scholar
  42. Lauffer MA (1975) Entropy-driven processes in biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 264Google Scholar
  43. Levinthal C (1968) Are there pathways for protein folding? J Chim Phys 65:44–45Google Scholar
  44. Levitt M (1980) Computer studies of protein molecules. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 17–39Google Scholar
  45. Lin L-N, Brandts JF (1978) Further evidence suggesting that the slow phase in protein unfolding and refolding is due to proline isomerization: A kinetic study of carp parvalbumins. Biochemistry 17:4102–4110Google Scholar
  46. Müller K, Lüdemann H-D, Jaenicke R (1981a) Reconstitution of LDH from pig heart after reversible high-pressure dissociation. Biochemistry 20:5411–5416Google Scholar
  47. Müller K, Lüdemann H-D, Jaenicke R (1981b) Pressure-induced structural changes of pig heart LDH. Biophys Chem 14:101–110Google Scholar
  48. Müller K, Lüdemann H-D, Jaenicke R (1982) Thermodynamics and mechanism of high pressure deactivation and dissociation of porcine LDH. Biophys Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Nall BT, Garel J-R, Baldwin RL (1978) Test of the extended two-state model for the kinetic intermediates observed in the folding transition of RNase A. J Mol Biol 118:317–330Google Scholar
  50. Pfeil W (1981) The problem of the stability of globular proteins. Mol Cell Biochem 40:3–28Google Scholar
  51. Richards FM, Wyckoff HW (1971) Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease. In: Boyer PD (ed) The Enzymes 3rd Ed, Vol 4, pp 647–806Google Scholar
  52. Richardson JS (1981) The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Protein Chem 34:168–339Google Scholar
  53. Rudolph R, Gerschitz J, Jaenicke R (1978) Effect of Zn (II) on the refolding and reactivation of L-ADH. Eur J Biochem 87:601–606Google Scholar
  54. Rudolph R, Zettlmei\l G, Jaenicke R (1979) Reconstitution of LDH. Noncovalent aggregation vs reactivation. 2. Reactivation of irreversibly denatured aggregates. Biochemistry 18:5572–5575Google Scholar
  55. Schade BC, Lüdemann H-D, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1980) Kinetics of reconstitution of porcine muscle LDH after reversible high-pressure dissociation. Biophys Chem 11:257–263Google Scholar
  56. Schade BC, Rudolph R, Lüdemann H-D, Jaenicke R (1980) Reversible high-pressure dissociation of LDH from pig muscle. Biochemistry 19:1121–1126Google Scholar
  57. Schmid FX, Baldwin RL (1978) Acid catalysis of the formation of the slow folding species of RNase A: Evidence that the reaction is proline isomerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4764–4768Google Scholar
  58. Schmid FX, Baldwin RL (1979) Detection of an early intermediate in the folding of RNase A by protection of amide protons against exchange. J Mol Biol 135:199–215Google Scholar
  59. Schulz GE, Schirmer HR (1979) Principles of protein structure. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, p 314Google Scholar
  60. Seifert T, Bartholmes P, Jaenicke R (1982) Reconstitution of the isolated Β 2 subunits of TSase from E. coli after dissociation induced by high hydrostatic pressure: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Biophys Chem 15:1–8Google Scholar
  61. Stadtman ER (1966) Allosteric regulation of enzyme activity. Adv Enzymol 28:41–154Google Scholar
  62. Sturtevant JM (1977) Heat capacity and entropy changes in processes involving proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:2236–2240Google Scholar
  63. Sturtevant JM, Velicelebi G, Jaenicke R, Lauffer MA (1981) Scanning calorimetric investigation of the polymerization of the coat protein of TMV. Biochemistry 20:3792–3800Google Scholar
  64. Tanford C (1968) Protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem 23:122–282Google Scholar
  65. Tanford C (1970) Protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem 24:1–95Google Scholar
  66. Teipel JW, Koshland DE Jr (1971) Kinetic aspects of conformational changes in proteins. Biochemistry 10:792–805Google Scholar
  67. Thomas KA, Schechter AN (1980) Protein folding: Evolutionary, structural and chemical aspects. In: Goldberger RF (ed) Biological regulation and development, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 43–100Google Scholar
  68. Wetlaufer DB (1980) Practical consequences of protein folding mechanisms. In: Jaenicke R (1980) loc. cit. pp 323–329Google Scholar
  69. Wetlaufer DB (1981) Folding of protein fragments. Adv Protein Chem 34:61–92Google Scholar
  70. Wetlaufer DB, Ristow S (1973) Acquisition of three-dimensional structure of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 42:135–158Google Scholar
  71. Zabori S, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1980) Folding and association of triose phosphate isomerase from rabbit muscle. Z Naturforsch 35c:999–1004Google Scholar
  72. Zettlmei\l G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1979a) Reconstitution of LDH: Non-covalent aggregation vs reactivation. I. Physical properties and kinetics of aggregation. Biochemistry 18:5567–5571Google Scholar
  73. Zettlmei\l G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1979b) Effects of low concentrations of guanidine · HCl on the reconstitution of LDH from pig muscle in vitro. Eur J Biochem 100:593–598Google Scholar
  74. Zettlmei\l G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1981) Reconstitution of LDH after acid dissociation: The yield of reactivation is determined by conformational rearrangements of the dissociated monomers. Eur J Biochem 121:169–175Google Scholar
  75. Zettlmei\l G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R (1982) Reconstitution of LDH: The ratio of reactivation to aggregation is not determined by cis ⇌ trans isomerization of X-proline peptide bonds. Eur J Biochem (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Jaenicke
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Biophysik und Physikalische BiochemieUniversitÄt RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations