Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Go to cart
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete
  3. Article
Ratio comparisons of supremum and stop rule expectations
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Functional L.I.L. for the Upper Extremes of i.i.d. Random Variarbles from a Sub-class of Heavy Tailed Distributions

31 October 2021

R. Vasudeva

Almost sure central limit theorems for the maxima of randomly chosen random variables

27 April 2023

Tomasz Krajka

On Optimal Estimates of Random Variables

01 May 2022

V. L. Khatskevich

A Note on Error Probabilities of the Likelihood Ratio Test Based on Transport Inequalities

30 May 2019

Neng-Yi Wang & Hui Jiang

Effective Erdős–Wintner Theorems

01 September 2021

Gérald Tenenbaum & Johann Verwee

On a relationship between randomly and non-randomly thresholded empirical average excesses for heavy tails

28 May 2019

Gilles Stupfler

A refined continuity correction for the negative binomial distribution and asymptotics of the median

03 February 2023

Frédéric Ouimet

Partial quasi-likelihood analysis

01 June 2018

Nakahiro Yoshida

Some mean value results related to Hardy’s function

16 April 2021

Xiaodong Cao, Yoshio Tanigawa & Wenguang Zhai

Download PDF
  • Published: June 1981

Ratio comparisons of supremum and stop rule expectations

  • Theodore P. Hill1 &
  • Robert P. Kertz1 

Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete volume 56, pages 283–285 (1981)Cite this article

  • 119 Accesses

  • 30 Citations

  • Metrics details

Summary

Suppose X 1,X 2,...,Xn are independent non-negative random variables with finite positive expectations. Let T n denote the stop rules for X 1,...,X n. The main result of this paper is that E(max{X 1,...,X n }) <2 sup{EX t :tεT n }. The proof given is constructive, and sharpens the corresponding weak inequalities of Krengel and Sucheston and of Garling.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Bibliography

  1. Chow, Y.S., Robbins, H., Siegmund, D.: Great Expectations: The Theory of Optimal Stopping. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1971

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edgar, G.A., Sucheston, L.: Amarts; A Class of Asymptotic Martingales. A. Discrete Parameter. J. Multivariate Analysis, 3, 193–221 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krengel, U., Sucheston, L.: Semiamarts and Finite Values. Bulletin of the Amer. Math. Soc. 83, 745–747 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krengel, U., Sucheston, L.: On Semiamarts, Amarts, and Processes with Finite Value in Probability on Banach Spaces. New York: Marcel Dekker 1978

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krengel, U., Sucheston, L.: How to Bet Against a Prophet. (Some L 1 Dominated Estimates for Semiamarts). Abstract, Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 24, A-159 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Theodore P. Hill & Robert P. Kertz

Authors
  1. Theodore P. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert P. Kertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Partially supported by AFOSR Grant F49620-79-C-0123

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, T.P., Kertz, R.P. Ratio comparisons of supremum and stop rule expectations. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw Gebiete 56, 283–285 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535745

Download citation

  • Received: 20 April 1979

  • Revised: 01 September 1980

  • Issue Date: June 1981

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00535745

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Stochastic Process
  • Probability Theory
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Positive Expectation
  • Ratio Comparison
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.