The extent of non-conglomerability of finitely additive probabilities
- 106 Downloads
An arbitrary finitely additive probability can be decomposed uniquely into a convex combination of a countably additive probability and a purely finitely additive (PFA) one. The coefficient of the PFA probability is an upper bound on the extent to which conglomerability may fail in a finitely additive probability with that decomposition. If the probability is defined on a σ-field, the bound is sharp. Hence, non-conglomerability (or equivalently non-disintegrability) characterizes finitely as opposed to countably additive probability. Nonetheless, there exists a PFA probability which is simultaneously conglomerable over an arbitrary finite set of partitions.
Neither conglomerability nor non-conglomerability in a given partition is closed under convex combinations. But the convex combination of PFA ultrafilter probabilities, each of which cannot be made conglomerable in a common margin, is singular with respect to any finitely additive probability that is conglomerable in that margin.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Armstrong, T.E., Sudderth, W.: Nearly Strategic Measures. Pacific J of Math. Forthcoming (University of Minnesota School of Statistics Technical Report No. 334), (1981)Google Scholar
- 3.Ash, R.B.: Real Analysis and Probability. New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
- 6.DeFinetti, B.: Probability, Induction and Statistics. New York: Wiley 1972Google Scholar
- 7.DeFinetti, B.: The Theory of Probability. (2 volumes) New York: Wiley 1974Google Scholar
- 9.Dunford, N., Schwartz, J.T.: Linear Operations, Part I: General Theory. New York: Interscience 1958Google Scholar
- 10.Kadane, J.B., Schervish, M.J., Seidenfeld, T.: Statistical implications of finitely additive probability. In: Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques with Applications: Essays in Honor of Bruno de Finetti, Goel, P.K., Zellner, A. (eds.) (to appear)Google Scholar
- 14.Prikry, K., Sudderth, W.: Singularity with Respect to Strategic Measures. Unpublished manuscript (1980)Google Scholar