Advertisement

Theoretica chimica acta

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 385–400 | Cite as

119Sn electric field gradients in model clusters of chalcogenide glasses

  • Jozef Bicerano
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Calculations of 119Sn electric field gradients (EFG) have been performed using the Extended Hückel approximation on characteristic molecular clusters simulating possible types of sites in chalcogenide glasses. The motivation for these calculations derives from theoretical concepts on varying near neighbor relationships in these types of glasses, and from recent 119Sn Mössbauer experiments on Sn-doped Gex(Se or S)1−x bulk glasses which reveal three types (A, B and C) of chemically inequivalent sites, with distinct values and composition dependences for their isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings. The model clusters chosen for the calculations were the ethane-like (Ge2Se3)n quasi-one-dimensional chains of varying lengths which have been proposed as possible sources of the B site. In addition, calculations were also carried out on several additional types of clusters, in order to help in interpreting the results for the chains. We find that the magnitude of the quadrupole splitting in isolated linear ethane-like chains is very small, and almost independent of the particular site along the chain at which Sn replaces Ge. It therefore seems unlikely that such isolated linear clusters would be the source of the B sites. These sites are more likely to be related to distortions of the ethane-like clusters into non-linear configurations, as well as interactions with neighboring clusters, as forced by the constraints of the packing in the structure of the glass.

Key words

119Sn Electric field gradient Model Calculation Mössbauer Extended Hückel Packing Structure Chalcogenide glasses Quadrupole splittings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and notes

  1. 1.
    Ovshinsky SR (1968) Phys Rev Lett 21:1450Google Scholar
  2. 2.(a)
    Ovshinsky SR (1981) J. Phys. Colloq C4, suppl. au no. 10, 42:1095;Google Scholar
  3. 2.(b)
    Ovshinsky SR (1981) Rev Roum Phys 26:893;Google Scholar
  4. 2.(c)
    Ovshinsky SR (1985) In: Adler D, Schwartz BB, Steele MC (eds) Physical properties of amorphous materials. Plenum Press, New York, pp 105–155Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    deNeufville JP (1974) In: Stuke J, Brenig W (eds) Proc. 5th International Conference on Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors. Taylor and Francis, London pp 1351–1360Google Scholar
  6. 4.(a)
    Boolchand P (1985) In: Adler D, Schwartz BB, Steele MC (eds) Physical properties of amorphous materials. Plenum Press, New York, pp 221–260;Google Scholar
  7. 4.(b)
    Boolchand P, Grothaus J, Bresser WJ, Suranyi P (1982) Phys Rev B 25:2975;Google Scholar
  8. 4.(c)
    Bresser WJ, Boolchand P, Suranyi P (1986) Phys Rev Lett 56:2493Google Scholar
  9. 5.(a)
    See:Boolchand P, Grothaus J (1984) In: Chadi JD, Harrison WA (eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors. Springer, New York, p 833 for GeSe2;Google Scholar
  10. 5.(b)
    See:Boolchand P, Grothaus J, Tenhover M, Hazle MA, Grasselli RK (1986) Phys Rev B 33:5421 for GeS2;Google Scholar
  11. 5.(c)
    See: Boolchand P et al, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  12. 6.
    Pauling L (1960) The nature of the chemical bond, 3rd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp 224–225, gives Ge(1.22 Å), Sn(1.40 Å), Se(1.17 Å) and S(1.04 Å). Slightly different values have also been quoted in the literature. We used 1.41 Å for Sn and 1.16 Å for Se. The Van der Waals radii are listed in p 260Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    Sanderson RT (1967) Inorganic chemistry, Reinhold, New York, p 136Google Scholar
  14. 8.
    Lafferty WJ, Plyler EK (1962) J Chem Phys 37:2688Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Weast RC, Astle MJ (1979) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 60th edn. CRC Press, p F-218Google Scholar
  16. 10.
    Hazen RM, Finger LW (1978) Am Mineral 63:289Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    Hague RH, Hastie JW, Margrave JL (1973) J Mol Spectrosc 45:420Google Scholar
  18. 12.(a)
    Milligan DE, Jacox ME, Guillory WA (1968) J Chem Phys. 49:5330;Google Scholar
  19. 12.(b)
    Ling-Fai Wang J, Krishnan CN, Margrave JL (1973) J Mol Spectrosc 48:346Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    Howell J, Rossi A, Wallace D, Haraki K, Hoffmann R, QCPE, Program No. 344Google Scholar
  21. 14.(a)
    Hoffmann R, J Chem Phys (1963) 39:1397;Google Scholar
  22. 14.(b)
    Hoffmann R, Lipscomb WN: J Chem Phys(1962) 36:2179 and 3479; (1963) J Chem Phys 37: 2872Google Scholar
  23. 15.
    Lohr Jr LL, Pyykkö P (1979) Chem Phys Lett 62:333Google Scholar
  24. 16.
    Desclaux J-P (1973) At Data Nucl Data Tables 12:311Google Scholar
  25. 17.
    Greenwood NN, Gibb TC (1971) Mössbauer spectroscopy. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 18.
    Coker A, Lee T, Das TP (1976) Phys Rev B 13:55Google Scholar
  27. 19.
    Goldanskí VI, Herber RH (1968) Chemical applications of Mössbauer spectroscopy. New York, Academic Press, pp 321–322Google Scholar
  28. 20.
    Jena P: Theoretical values, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  29. 21.
    Borsa F, Barnes RG (1964) Phys Rev Lett 12:281Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jozef Bicerano
    • 1
  1. 1.Energy Conversion Devices, IncTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations