Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrastructural differences between the sinus and the müllerian epithelium of the mouse vaginal anlage

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The mouse vaginal anlage consists of an anterior müllerian part and a posterior part derived from the urogenital sinus: the sinus vagina. Ultrastructural differences between the two parts have been studied. In contrast to the epithelial cells of the müllerian vagina, the cells of the sinus vagina at birth develop a basal cortical zone against the stroma border. Invaginations of the basal cell membrane enter the cortical zone, and minute vesicles are separated off. The sinus vagina has no typical basal lamina. During the postnatal period, the epithelia of both vaginal parts converge into a uniform immature epithelium with a distinct basal lamina. The morphological findings are related to other results concerning the vaginal epithelium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Flickinger, C. J.: The fine structure and development of the seminal vesicles and prostate in the fetal rat. Z. Zellforsch. 109, 1–14 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, J.-G., Kvinnsland, S.: The appearance and distribution of vaginal antigen during the differentiation of the cervicovaginal epithelium in normal and estradioltreated mice. (In print.)

  • —, Olivecrona, H.: Further studies on the differentiation of the epithelium in the mouse vaginal anlage. Z. Zellforsch. 66, 867–877 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C.: Mechanisms of organogenetic tissue interaction. Nat. Cancer Inst. Monogr. No 26, 279–299 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Developmental significance of interface materials in epitheliomesenchymal interaction. In: Epithelialmesenchymal interactions (ed. Fleischmajer and R. E. Billingham), p. 173–176. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Company 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. D., Perce, G. B.: Changes in antigenicity of basement membrane during wound healing. Develop. Biol. 23, 534–549 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallman, F., Grobstein, C.: Source of collagen at epitheliomesenchymal interfaces during inductive interaction. Develop. Biol. 11, 169–183 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——: Localization of glucosamineincorporating materials at epithelial surfaces during salivary epithelio-mesenchymal interaction in vitro. Develop. Biol. 14, 52–67 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Millonig, G.: Further observations on a phosphate buffer for osmium solution in fixation. In: Electron microscopy, vol. 2 (ed. S. Breese), p. P-8. New York: Academic Press 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, E. S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S., Biggers, J. D., Anderson, E.: Mitochondria and early development of the mouse. J. exp. Zool. 176, 179–192 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartiovaara, J.: Cell contacts in relation to cytodifferentiation in metanephrogenic mesenchyme in vitro. Ann. Med. exp. Fenn. 44, 469–503 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsberg, JG., Åbro, A. Ultrastructural differences between the sinus and the müllerian epithelium of the mouse vaginal anlage. Z. Anat. Entwickl. Gesch. 135, 67–75 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00525192

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00525192

Key words

Navigation