, Volume 13, Issue 1–2, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Structure and properties of the major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. Speculations on the advantages and evolution of polymorphism

  • B. Michael Longenecker
  • Tim R. Mosmann


Major Histocompatibility Complex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alt, F. W., Bothwell, A. L. M., Knapp, M., Siden, E., Mather, E., Koshland, M., and Baltimore, D.: Synthesis of secreted and membrane-bound immunoglobulin mu heavy chains is directed by mRNA's that differ at their 3′ ends. Cell 20: 293–301, 1980Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, L. D., Schierman, L. W., and McBride, R. A.: Alloimmune hemolytic plaque-forming cells: kinetics of IgM and IgG alloantibody releasing cells during a primary and secondary immune response of chickens. J. Immunol. 109: 207–212, 1972Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, L. D., Sundick, R. S., and Rose, N. R.: Genetic and cellular control of spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis in OS chickens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 309–315, 1977Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, L. D. and Rose, N. R.: Influence of major histocompatibility haplotype on autoimmune disease varies in different inbred families of chickens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76: 1435–1437, 1979Google Scholar
  5. Bacon, L. D., Fadly, A. M., Motta, J. V., and Crittenden, L. B.: B-haplotype influence on erythroblastosis in chickens. Fed. Proc. 38: 1164, 1979Google Scholar
  6. Bacon, L. D. and Witter, R. L.: B2 determines resistance of Marek's disease tumour in contrast to B 5 in (63 × 151)F5 chickens. Fed. Proc. 39: 938, 1980Google Scholar
  7. Balcarová, J., Hála, K., and Hraba, T.: Differences in the intensity of antibody formation to different antigens in inbred lines of chickens. Folia Biol. (Praha) 19: 329–336, 1973Google Scholar
  8. Balcarová, J., Derka, J., Hála, K., and Hraba, T.: Genetic control of immune response to the dinitrophenol group in inbred lines of chickens. Folia Biol. (Praha) 20 (5): 346–349, 1974 aGoogle Scholar
  9. Balcarová, J., Medlin, J., Hála, K., and Hraba, T.: Immune response to pneumococcal polysaccharide in inbred lines of chicken. Folia Biol. (Praha) 20: 221–224, 1974 bGoogle Scholar
  10. Balcarová, J., Günther, E., Hála, K., Rüde, E., and Hraba, T.: Further evidence for the genetic control of immune responsiveness to (T, G)-A-L by the B system in chickens. Folia Biol. (Praha) 21(6):406–408, 1975Google Scholar
  11. Basch, R. S., Janossay, G., and Greaves, M. F.: Murine pluripotential stem-cells lack Ia antigen. Nature 270: 520–522, 1977Google Scholar
  12. Benedict, A. A., Pollard, L. W., Morrow, P. R., Abplanalp, H. A., Maurer, P. H., and Briles, W. E.: Genetic control of immune responses in chickens. I. Responses to a terpolymer of poly (Glu60Ala30Tyr60 associated with the major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 2: 313–324, 1975Google Scholar
  13. Bodmer, W. F.: New genetic model for allelism at histocompatibility and other complex locipolymorphism for control for gene expression. Transplant. Proc. 5: 1471–1475, 1973Google Scholar
  14. Bodmer, W. F., and Bodmer, J. G.: Evolution and function of the HLA system. Br. Med. Bull. 34: 309–316, 1978Google Scholar
  15. Briles, C. O., Briles, W. E., and Quisenberry, J. H.: The linkage relationships between the loci producing the blood group antigens and other marked loci. Poultry Sci. 29: 750–751, 1950Google Scholar
  16. Briles, W. E., Allen, C. P., and Millen, T. W.: The B blood group system of chickens. f. Heterozygosity in closed populations. Genetics 42: 631–648, 1957Google Scholar
  17. Briles, W. E. and Allen, C. P.: The B blood group system of chickens. II. The effects of genotype on livability and egg production in seven commercial inbred lines. Genetics 46: 1273–1293, 1961Google Scholar
  18. Briles, W. R. and Briles, C. W.: Some recent recombinants at the B locus. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 221–226, 1977Google Scholar
  19. Briles, W. E., Stone, H. A., and Cole, R. K.: Marek's disease: effects of B histocompatibility alloalleles in resistant and susceptible chicken lines. Science 195: 193–195, 1977Google Scholar
  20. Briles, W. E.: Report of ad hoc committee on the current status of B-haplotype nomenclature. Northeastern States Regional Project (NE-60) on the Genetic Basis for Resistance to Avian Diseases, pp. 116–121, 1979Google Scholar
  21. Briles, W. E., Briles, R. W., McGibbon, W. H., and Stone, H. A.: Identification of B alloalleles associated with resistance to Marek's disease. In P. M. Biggs (ed.): Resistance and Immunity to Marek's disease, pp. 395–416, ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels, Luxembourg, 1980Google Scholar
  22. Brogren, C. H., Bisati, S., and Simonsen, M.: The major histocompatibility complex antigens as lectin receptors on lymphocytes. A study by O'Farrell's two dimensional gel electrophoresis. In G. Peters (ed.): Protides of Biological Fluids 27th Coll, pp. 467–470, Pergamon Press Oxford, 1979Google Scholar
  23. Brogren, C. H. and Bisati, S.: Comparative molecular aspects of the chicken major histocompatibility complex coded alloantigens. A two-dimensional electrophoretic study of beta-2-microglobulin associated and HLA-DR antigen like molecules of spleen lymphocytes. Protides of the Biological Fluids, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980Google Scholar
  24. Calnek, B. W., Fabricam, J., Schat, K. A., and Murthy, K. K.: Rejection of a transplantable Marek's disease lymphoma in normal versus immunologically deficient chickens. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60: 623–631, 1978Google Scholar
  25. Chanh, T. C., Benedict, A. A., and Abplanalp, H.: Association of serum hemolytic complement levels with the major histocompatibility complex in chickens. J. Exp. Med. 144 (2): 555–561, 1976Google Scholar
  26. Cole, R. K.: Hereditary hypothroidism in the domestic fowl. Genetics 53: 1021–1025, 1966Google Scholar
  27. Cole, R. K.: Studies on genetic resistance to Marek's disease. Avian Dis. 12: 9–28, 1968Google Scholar
  28. Cole, R. K., Kite, J. H., Wick, G., and Witebsky, E.: Inherited autoimmune thyroiditis in the fowl. Poultry Sci. 49: 839–844, 1970Google Scholar
  29. Collins, W. M., Briles, W. E., Zsigray, R. M., Dunlop, W. R., Corbett, A. C.; Clark, K. K., Marks, J. L., and McGrail, T. P.: The B locus (MHC) in the chicken: association with the fate of RSV-induced tumors. Immunogenetics 5: 333–343, 1977Google Scholar
  30. Collins, W. M., Briles, W. E., Corbett, A. C., Clark, K. K., Zsigray, R. M., and Dunlop, W. R.: B locus (MHC) effect upon regression of RSV-induced tumors in non inbred chickens. Immunogenetics 9: 97–100, 1979Google Scholar
  31. Collins, W. M., Heinzelmann, E. W., Corbett, A. C., Zsigray, R. M., and Dunlop, W. R.: Rous sarcoma regression in seven highly inbred lines of White Leghorns. Poultry Sci. 59: 1172–1177, 1980Google Scholar
  32. Cunningham, A. J.: Active suppressor mechanism maintaining tolerance to some self components. Nature 254: 143–144, 1975Google Scholar
  33. Damian, R. T.: Molecular Mimicry: — Antigen sharing by parasite and host and its consequences. Am. Nat. 98: 129–149, 1964Google Scholar
  34. Dausset, J., Legrand, L., Lepage, V., Contu, L., Marcelli-Barge, A., Wildloecher, I., Benajam, A., Meo, T., and Degos, L.: A haplotype study of HLA complex with special reference to the HLA-DR series and to BfC2 and glyoxalase I polymorphism. Tissue Antigens 12: 297–307, 1978Google Scholar
  35. David, C. S., Stimpfling, J. H., and Shreffler, D. C.: Identification of specificity H-2.7 as an erythrocyte antigen: Control by an independent locus, H-2G, between the S and D regions. Immunogenetics 2: 131–139, 1975Google Scholar
  36. Davis, M. M., Calame, K., Early, P. W., Livant, D. L., Joho, R., Weisman, I. J., and Hood, L.: An immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene is formed by at least two recombinational events. Nature 283: 733–742, 1980Google Scholar
  37. Doherty, C. C., Blanden, R. V., and Zinkernagel, R. M.: Specificity of virus immune effector T cells for H-2K or H-2D compatible interactions: Implications for H-antigen diversity. Transplant. Rev. 29: 89–124, 1976Google Scholar
  38. Early, P., Rogers, J., Davis, M., Calame, K., Bond, M., Wall, R., and Hood, L.: Two mRNA's can be produced from a single immunoglobulin μ gene by alternative RNA processing pathways. Cell 20: 313–319, 1980Google Scholar
  39. Ebringer, R. W., Cawdell, D. R., Cowling, P., and Ebringer, A.: Sequential studies in ankylosingspondylitis-association of Klebsiella pneumoniae with active disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 37: 146–151, 1978Google Scholar
  40. Ewert, E. L. and Cooper, M. D.: Ia-like alloantigens in the chicken: serological characterization and ontogeny of cellular expression. Immunogenetics 7: 521–535, 1978Google Scholar
  41. Ewert, D. L., Gilmour, D. G., Briles, W. E., and Cooper, M. D.: Genetics of la-like alloantigens in chickens and linkage with B major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 10: 169–174, 1980Google Scholar
  42. Ferrone, S., Pellegrino, M. A., and Mittal, K. K.: Natural antibodies to human lymphocytes in murine strains. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 56: 75–78, 1976Google Scholar
  43. Fredericksen, T. L., Longenecker, B. M., Pazderka, F., Gilmour, D. G., and Ruth, R. F.: A T-cell antigen system of chickens: Ly-4 and Marek's disease. Immunogenetics 5: 535–552, 1977Google Scholar
  44. Gallatin, W. M. and Longenecker, B. M.: Expression of genetic resistance to an oncogenic herpesvirus at the target cell level. Nature 280: 587–589, 1979Google Scholar
  45. Gallatin, W. M. and Longenecker, B. M.: In Non-MHC-associated genetic resistance to Marek's disease: expression at the target cell level. P. M. Biggs (ed.): Resistance and Immunity, to Marek's Disease pp. 417–428,1980Google Scholar
  46. Gavora, J. S. and Spencer, J. L.: Studies on genetic resistance of chickens to Marek's disease — a review. Comp. Immunol. Microbial. Infect. Dis. 2: 359–371, 1979Google Scholar
  47. Gebriel, G. M., Pevzner, I. Y., and Nordskog, A. W.: Genetic linkage between immune response to GAT and the fate of RSV-induced tumors in chickens. Immunogenetics 9: 327–334, 1979Google Scholar
  48. Günther, E., Balcarová, J., Hála, K., Rüde, E., and Hraba, T.: Evidence for an association between immune responsiveness of chicken to (T, G)-A-L and the major histocompatibility system. Eur. J. Immunol. 4: 548–553, 1974Google Scholar
  49. Hála, K., Vilhelmová, M., and Hartmanová, J.: Probable crossing-over in the B blood group system of chickens. Immunogenetics 3:97–103, 1976Google Scholar
  50. Hála, K.: The structure of the major histocompatibility (B) complex of the chicken. Folia. Biol. (Praha) 23: 400–401, 1977Google Scholar
  51. Hála, K., Vilhelmová, M., and Hartmanová, J.: The structure of the major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 227–232, 1977Google Scholar
  52. Hála, K., Vilhelmová, M., Schulmannová, J., and Plachý, J.: A new recombinant allele in the B complex of the chicken. Folia Biol. (Praha) 25: 323–324, 1979Google Scholar
  53. Hála, K., Schulmannova, J., and Némécková, S.: The role of primary lymphoid organs of chickens in the elimination of 51Cr-labelled erythrocytes. Folia. Biol. (Praha) 26: 26–33, 1980Google Scholar
  54. Halper, J. and Broymeyer, H. E.: Expression of la-like antigen molecules of human granulocytes during early phases of differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74: 4012–4016, 1977Google Scholar
  55. Hammerberg, C. and Klein, J.: Linkage disequilibrium between H-2 and t complexes in chromosome 17 of the mouse. Nature 258: 296–299, 1975Google Scholar
  56. Hanson, M. P., van Zandy, J. N., and Law, G. R. J.: Differences in susceptibility to Marek's disease in chickens carrying two different B locus blood group alleles. Poultry Sci. 46: 1268, 1967Google Scholar
  57. Hartmanová, J. and Hála, K.: Development of immunity against antigens of the A and B blood groups during postembryogenesis in chickens. Folia. Biol. (Praha) 22: 264–272, 1976Google Scholar
  58. Hirata, A. A. and Terasaki, P. I.: Cross-reactions between streptococcal M-proteins and human transplantation antigens. Science 168: 1095–1096, 1970Google Scholar
  59. Hirata, A. A., Armstrong, A. S., Kaz, J. W. D., and Terasaki, P. I.: In: P. I. Terasaki, (ed.), Histocompatibility testing. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1970Google Scholar
  60. Hirata, A. A., McIntire, F. C., Terasaki, P. I. and Mittal, K. K.: Cross-reaction between human transplantation antigens and bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Transplantation 15: 441–445, 1973Google Scholar
  61. Hoecker, G. and Pizarro, O.: Some recent work on transplantation antigens. Biologica 31: 7, 1961Google Scholar
  62. Huang, C. M. and Klein, J.: Murine antigen H-2.7: in vitro phenotypic conversion of erythrocytes. Immunogenetics 9: 575–581, 1979Google Scholar
  63. Huang, C. M., Geib, R. W., and Klein, J.: Murine antigen H-2.7: phenotypic conversion of erythrocytes in radiation chimeras. Immunogenetics 9: 583–589, 1979Google Scholar
  64. Huser, H., Ziegler, A., Knecht, R., and Pink, J. R. L.: Partial aminoterminal amino acid sequences of chicken major histocompatibility antigens. Immunogenetics 6: 301–307, 1978Google Scholar
  65. Jerne, N. K.: The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur. J. Immunol. 1: 1–9, 1971Google Scholar
  66. Karakoz, I., Krejči, J., Hála, K., Blaszczyk, B., Hraba, T., and Pekárek, J.: Genetic determination of tuberculin hypersensitivity in chicken inbred lines. Eur. J. Immunol. 4: 545–548, 1974Google Scholar
  67. Karakoz, I., Blaszczyk, B., and Gieldanowski, J.: Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in inbred lines of chickens. Folia. Biol. (Praha) 23: 396–397, 1977Google Scholar
  68. Katz, D. H.: Lymphocyte Differentiation, Recognition and Regulation. Academic Press, New York, 1977Google Scholar
  69. Kearney, J. F., Cooper, M. D., Klein, J., Abney, E. R., Parkhouse, R. M. E., and Lawton, A. R.: Ontogeny of la and IgD on IgM-bearing B lymphocytes in mice. J. Exp. Med. 146: 297–301, 1977Google Scholar
  70. Kincade, P. W., Paige, C. J., Parkhouse, R. M. E., and Lee, G.: Characterization of murine colonyforming B cells. I. Distribution, resistance to anti-immunoglobulin antibodies and expression of la antigens. J. Immunol. 120: 1289–1296, 1978Google Scholar
  71. Klein, J.: Biology of the Mouse Histocompatibility-2 Complex. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975Google Scholar
  72. Klein, J., Hauptfeld, V., and Hauptfeld, M.: Evidence for a fifth (G) region the H-2 complex of the mouse. Immunogenetics 2: 141–150, 1975Google Scholar
  73. Koch, C.: Antibody response in chickens to a random copolymer of Glutamic Acid and Tyrosine. Folia Biol. (Praha) 23: 411–414, 1977Google Scholar
  74. Koch, C. and Simonsen, M.: Immune response genes in chickens. Antibody responses to TGAL and GT. Immunogenetics 5: 161–170, 1977Google Scholar
  75. Koch, C., Hála, K., and Sørup, P.: Immune response genes in chickens: The multifarious responsiveness to (T,G)-A--L. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 233–243, 1977Google Scholar
  76. Kvist, S., Klareskog, L., and Peterson, P. A.: Identification of H-2 and la-antigen analogues in several species by immunological cross-reaction of xenoantisera. Scand. J. Immunol. 7: 447–452, 1978Google Scholar
  77. Lee, L. F., Powell, P. C., Rennie, M. C., Ross, L. J. N., and Payne, L. M.: The nature of genetic resistance to Marek's disease lymphoma in chickens. Fed. Proc. 39: 780, 1980Google Scholar
  78. Letarte, M. and Falk, J.: Analysis of serologic gross-reactions between human and mouse la antigens. J. Immunol. 125: 1210–1215, 1980Google Scholar
  79. Longenecker, B. M., Pazderka, F., Law, G. R. J. and Ruth, R. F.: Genetic control of graft-versus-host competence. Transplantation 14: 424–431, 1972Google Scholar
  80. Longenecker, B. M. and Gallatin, W. M.: Genetic control of resistance to Marek's disease. In de The, G., Henle, W. and Rapp F.: (eds.): Oncogenesis and Herpesviruses, Volume 3, part 2, Lyon (IARC Scientific publications, No. 24, pt. 2), 1978Google Scholar
  81. Longenecker, B. M., Pazderka, F., Gavora, J. S., Spencer, J. L., and Ruth, R. F.: Lymphoma induced by herpesvirus: resistance associated with a major histocompatibility gene. Immunogenetics 3: 401–407, 1976Google Scholar
  82. Longenecker, B. M., Pazderka, F., Gavora, J. S., Spencer, J. L., Stephens, E. A., Witter, R. L. and Ruth, R. F.: Role of the major histocompatibility locus in resistance to Marek's disease: restriction of the growth of JMV-MD tumour cells in genetically resistant birds. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 287–298, 1977Google Scholar
  83. Longenecker, B. M., Singh, B., Gallatin, M., and Havele C.: Histocompatibility typing by cellular radioimmunoassay. Immunogenetics 7: 201–211, 1978Google Scholar
  84. Longenecker, B. M., Mosmann, T. R., and Shiozawa, C.: A strong, preferential response of mice to polymorphic antigenic determinants of the chicken MHC, analyzed with mouse hybridoma (monoclonal) antibodies. Immunogenetics 9: 137–147, 1979Google Scholar
  85. Longenecker, B. M. and Mosmann, T. R.: Restricted expression of an MHC alloantigen in cells of the erythroid series: a specific marker for erythroid differentiation. J. Suprarnol. Struct., in press, 1980aGoogle Scholar
  86. Longenecker, B. M. and Mosmann, T. R.: „Natural” antibodies to chicken MHC antigens are present in mice, rats, humans, alligators and allogeneic chickens. Immunogenetics 11: 293–302, 1980bGoogle Scholar
  87. Longenecker, B. M., and Mosmann,T. R.: Nomenclature for chicken MHC (B) antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies. Immunogenetics 13: 25–28, 1981Google Scholar
  88. Marks, J. L., Collins, W. M., Corbett, A. C., Zsigray, R. M., and Dunlop, W. R., Genetic nature of regression of Rous sarcoma virus-induced tumors in crosses of Regional Poultry Research Laboratory lines 6 and 72. Poultry Sci. 58: 502–508, 1979Google Scholar
  89. McBride, R. A. and Schierman, L. W.: Hapten-carrier relationships of isoantigens. A model for immunological maturation based on the conversion of haptens to carriers by antibody. J. Exp. Med. 131: 377–385, 1970Google Scholar
  90. McBride, R. A., Cutting, J. A., Schierman, L. W., Strebel, F. S. and Watanabe, D. H.: Genetically controlled regression of avian sarcoma virusinduced tumors in inbred chickens is determined by the virus strain. Fed. Proc. 39: 1154, 1980Google Scholar
  91. Mittal, K. K., Ferrone, S., Mickey, M. R., Pellegrino, M. A., Reisfeld, R. A., and Terasaki, P. I.: Serological characterisation of natural antihuman lymphocytotoxic antibodies in mammalian sera. Transplantation 16: 287–294, 1973Google Scholar
  92. Mosmann, T. R., Gallatin, M., and Longenecker, B. M.: Alteration of apparent specificity of monoclonal (hybridoma) antibodies recognising polymorphic histocompatibility and blood group determinants. J. Immunol. 125: 1152–1156, 1980Google Scholar
  93. Nordskog, A. W., Rishell, W. A., and Briggs, D. M.: Influence of B locus blood groups on adult mortality and egg production in White Leghorn chickens. Genetics 75: 181–189 1973Google Scholar
  94. Nordskog, A. W., Pevzner, I. Y., Trowbridge, C. L., and Benedict, A. A.: Immune response and adult mortality associated with the B locus in chickens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 245–256, 1977Google Scholar
  95. Parish, C. R., Higgins, T. J., and McKenzie, I. F.: Comparison of antigens recognized by xenogenic and allogeneic anti-la antibodies: Evidence for two classes of la antigens. Immunogenetics 6: 343–354, 1978Google Scholar
  96. Payne, L. M.: Pathogenesis of Marek's disease. A Review. In P. M. Biggs, G. de, The, and L. N. Payne (eds.): Herpesviruses and Onogenesis, IARC Scientific Publications No. 2, pp. 21–37, 1972Google Scholar
  97. Pazderka, F., Longenecker, B. M., Law, G. R. J., and Ruth, R. F.: The major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. Immunogenetics 2: 101–130, 1975aGoogle Scholar
  98. Pazderka, F., Longenecker, B. M., Law, G. R. J., Stone, H. A., and Ruth, R. F.: Histocompatibility of chicken populations selected for resistance to Marek's disease. Immunogenetics 2: 93–100, 1975bGoogle Scholar
  99. Petek, M. and Quaglio, G. L.: Experimental allergic neuritis in the chicken. Path. Vet. 4: 464–467, 1967Google Scholar
  100. Pevzner, I. Y., Trowbridge, C. L., and Nordskog, A. W.: Recombination between genes coding for immune response and the serologically determined antigens in the chicken B system. Immunogenetics 7: 25–33, 1978Google Scholar
  101. Pevzner, I. Y., Trowbridge, C. L., and Nordskog, A. W.: B-complex genetic control of immune response to HSA, (T, G)-A--L, GT and other substances in chickens. J. Immunogenet. 6: 453–460, 1979aGoogle Scholar
  102. Pevzner, I. Y., Kujdych, I., and Nordskog, A. W.: Genetic control of resistance to Marek's disease linked to the immune response region of the B complex of chickens. Poultry Sci. 58: 1093, 1979bGoogle Scholar
  103. Pink, J. R. L., Droege, W., Hála, K., Miggiano, V. C., and Ziegler, A.: A three-locus model for the chicken major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 5: 203–216, 1977aGoogle Scholar
  104. Pink, J. R. L., Miggiano, V. C., and Ziegler, A.: Antigens of the chicken major histocompatibility B complex. Folia Biol. (Praha) 23: 404–405, 1977bGoogle Scholar
  105. Pink, J. R. L.: Lectin-binding products of the chicken major histocompatibility complex. Folia Biol. (Praha) 25: 333–334, 1979Google Scholar
  106. Pink, J. R. L.: Major histocompatibility antigens. In H. Gutfreund (ed.): Biochemical Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press, 1980Google Scholar
  107. Plachý, K., Hála, K., and Benda, V.: Regression of tumours induced by Rous sarcoma virus in different inbred lines of chickens. Folia Biol. (Praha) 25: 335–336, 1979Google Scholar
  108. Rose, N. R., Bacon, L. D., and Sundick, R. S.: Genetic determinants of thyroiditis in the OS chicken. Transplant. Rev. 31: 264–285, 1976Google Scholar
  109. Rosenberg, S. A., Schwartz, S., and Baker, A.: Natural antibodies to “cryptic” membrane antigens exposed by treatment with neuraminidase. Behring Inst. Mitt. 55: 204–208, 1974Google Scholar
  110. Schierman, L. W. and McBride, A. W.: Evidence for a mutational event at the B blood grouphistocompatibility locus in chickens. Transplantation 8: 515–516, 1969Google Scholar
  111. Schierman, L. W., Watanabe, D. H., and McBride, R. A.: Genetic control of Rous sarcoma regression in chickens: Linkage with the major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 5: 325–332, 1977aGoogle Scholar
  112. Schierman, L. W., Watanabe, D. H., and McBride, R. A.: Increased growth of Rous sarcoma in chickens pretreated with formalinized syngencic tumour cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 7: 710–713, 1977bGoogle Scholar
  113. Schierman, L. W. and Fletcher, O. J.: Genetic control of Marek's disease virus-induced transient paralysis: Association with the major histocompatibility complex. In P. M. Biggs, (ed.): Resistance and Immunity to Marek's Disease, p. 429–442, ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels, Luxembourg, 1980Google Scholar
  114. Schmahl, W., Hoffmann-Fezer, G., and Hoffmann, R.: Zur pathogenese der nervenlasionen bei marekscher krankeit des huhnes. I. Allergische hautreaktion gegen myelin peripherer nerven. Z. Immunitatsforsch. 150: 175–183, 1975Google Scholar
  115. Schulmannová, J., Hála, K., and Hraba, T.: Tolerance to alloantigens of the A and B systems in chickens. Folia Biol. (Praha) 24: 270–280, 1978Google Scholar
  116. Shreffler, D. C. and Snell, G. D.: The distribution of thirteen H-2 alloantigenic specificities among the products of eighteen H-2 alleles. Transplantation 8: 435–450, 1969Google Scholar
  117. Silver, J. and Hood, L.: Structure and evolution of transplantation antigens partial amino-acid sequences of H-2 K and H-2 D alloantigens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73: 599–603, 1976Google Scholar
  118. Simonsen, M.: The clonal selection hypothesis evaluated by grafted cells reacting against their hosts. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant Biol. 32: 517–535, 1967Google Scholar
  119. Simonsen, M., Hála, K., and Vilhelmová, M.: The use of GVH methods in analysis of the B-complex. Folia Biol. (Praha)23: 402–403, 1977aGoogle Scholar
  120. Simonsen, M., Hála, K., and Vilhelmová, M.: Allo-aggression in chicken: analysis of the B-complex by means of GVH splenomegaly and by inhibitory antibodies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 207–274, 1977bGoogle Scholar
  121. Simonsen, M., Hála, K., and Nicolaisen, E. M.: Linkage disequilibrium of MHC genes in the chicken. I. the B-F and B-G loci. Immunogenetics 10: 103–112, 1980Google Scholar
  122. Smilek, D. E., Boyd, H. C., Wilson, D. B., Zmijewski, C. M., Fitch, F. W., and McKearn, T. J.: Monoclonal rat anti-major histocompatibility complex antibodies display specificity for rat, mouse and human target cells. J. Exp. Med. 151: 1139–1150, 1980Google Scholar
  123. Snell, G. D.: The H-2 locus of the mouse: Observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism. Folia Biol. (Praha)14: 335–358, 1968Google Scholar
  124. Snell, G. D., Dausset, J., and Nathenson, S.: Histocompatibility, p. 185; Academic Press, 1976Google Scholar
  125. Sørup, P. and Koch, C.: Identification of different antigenic determinants within the synthetic multichain co-polymers (T,G)-A--L as recognized by the chicken. Significance of the PolyAla-Polylys backbone and identification of poly-D-Alanine as the antigenic determinant in backbone-directed responses. Scand. J. Immunol. 6: 31–38 1977Google Scholar
  126. Springer, G. F.: Blood group and Forssman antigenic determinants shared between microbes and mammalian cells. In P. Kallos, B. H. Waksman, and A. De Week (eds.): Progress in Allergy, Volume 15, pp. 9–77, S. Karger, Basel, 1971Google Scholar
  127. Springer, G. F., Horton, R. E., and Forbes, M.: Origin of anti-human blood group B agglutinins in White Leghorn Chickens. J. Exp. Med. 110: 221–224. 1959Google Scholar
  128. Springer, G. F. and Horton, R. E.: Blood group isoantibody stimulation in man by feeding blood groupactive bacteria. J. Clin. Invest. 48: 1280–1291, 1969Google Scholar
  129. Teh, H. S., Harley, E., Phillips, R. A., and Miller, R. G.: Quantitative studies on the precursors of cytotoxic lymphocytes. I. Characterization of a clonal assay and determination of the size of clones derived from simple precursors. J. Immunol. 118: 1049–1056, 1977Google Scholar
  130. Toivanen, A., and Toivanen, P.: Histocompatibility requirements for cellular cooperation in the chicken: generation of germinal centers. J. Immunol. 118 (2): 431–436, 1977Google Scholar
  131. Toivanen, A., Viljanen, M., and Tamminen, P.: Histocompatibility requirements for cellular cooperation in the chicken. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 88: 257–265, 1977Google Scholar
  132. Vilhelmová, M., Miggiano, V. C., Pink, J. R. L., Hála, K., and Hartmanová, J.: Analysis of the alloimmune properties of a recombinant genotype in the major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. Eur. J. Immunol. 7: 674–679, 1977Google Scholar
  133. Vitetta, E. S., Uhr, J. W., Klein, J., Pazderka, F., Moticka, E. J., Ruth, R. F., and Capra, J. D.: Homology of (murine) H-2 and (human) HLA with a chicken histocompatibility antigen. Nature 270: 535–536, 1977Google Scholar
  134. Von Boehmer, H., Haas, W., and Jerne, N. K.: Mayor histocompatability complex-linked immuneresponsiveness is acquired by lymphocytes of low-responder mice differentiating in thymus of highresponder mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75: 2439–2442, 1978Google Scholar
  135. Wainberg, M. A., Markson, Y., Weiss, D. W., and Doljanski, F.: Cellular immunity against Rous sarcomas of chickens. Preferential reactivity against autochthonous target cells as determined by lymphocyte adherence and cytotoxicity tests in vitro. Proc. Nod. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 3565–3569, 1974Google Scholar
  136. Watanabe, D. H., Cutting, J. A. Strebel, F. S., and McBride, R. A.: Genetic complementation of MHC genes which control regression of avian sarcoma virus-induced tumours in inbred lines of chickens. Fed. Proc. 39: 1154, 1980Google Scholar
  137. Ziegler, A. and Pink, J. R. L.: Characterization of major histocompatibility B antigens of the chicken. Transplantation 20: 523–527, 1975Google Scholar
  138. Ziegler, A. and Pink, J. R. L.: Chemical properties of two antigens controlled by the major histocompatibility complex of the chicken. J. Biol. Chem. 251: 5391–5396, 1976Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Michael Longenecker
    • 1
  • Tim R. Mosmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Immunology and MRC Group on ImmunoregulationUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations