Skip to main content
Log in

Stereospecificity in the proton magnetic relaxation rate of enantiotopic methyls and the methyl rotation barrier

  • Published:
Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry Aims and scope

Abstract

It is proposed that a distinction should be made between stereospecificity of the first kind, which provides spectral (line assignments in the NMR spectrum) and structural (molecular conformations) information, and stereospecificity of the second kind, which only provides spectral information, on the basis of the relaxation times T1. The nature of the stereospecificity was revealed in detail during analysis of the reasons for the differences in the proton relaxation times of enantiotopic gem-dimethyl groups in the conformationally rigid molecule of 2-oxo-5,5-dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxathiane. It is suggested that the barrier to rotation of the methyl in the geminal CH3-C-H fragment can be assessed from the temperature dependence of the t1 time of the methine proton. The experiment was carried out with the stereoisomeric r-2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-trans-7-methyl[2]1,3-dioxepane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. L. G. Werbelow and D. M. Grant, “Intramolecular dipolar relaxation in multispin systems,” Adv. Magn. Reson., 9, 189–299 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. D. Hall, “Spin-lattice relaxation: A fourth dimension for proton NMR spectroscopy,” Chem. Soc. Revs., 14, No. 3, 401–420 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. D. Hall and C. M. Preston, “A configuration dependence of the longitudinal relaxation times of carbohydrate derivatives,” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., No. 24, 1319, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Imanary, M. Ochuchi, and K. Ishizu, “13C Spin-lattice relaxation of hindered bi-phenyls with ortho- and para-alkyl substituents,” J. Magn. Reson., 14, No. 3, 374–377 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Freeman, H. D. W. Hill, and B. L. Tomlinson, “Dipolar contribution to NMR spin-lattice relaxation of protons,” J. Chem. Phys., 61, No. 11, 4466–4473 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Pouzard, L. D. Hall, J. P. Zahra, and B. Woegell, “Détermination des déplacements chimiques des protons axiaux équatiaux dans une bromo cyclohexanone. Une application de la mesure des temps de relaxation longitudinaux des protons,” Org. Magn. Reson., 9, No. 11, 627–630 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu. Yu. Samitov and R. H. Sadykov, “Stereospecificity of selective proton relaxation times in rigid organic molecules,” Magn. Reson. and Related Phenomena: Proc. Tenth Congres AMPERE (1979), p. 462.

  8. K. A. Mochammad, “Proton spin-lattice relaxation study N-aryl-1-isoindolinones,” J. Heterocycl. Chem., 17, No. 4, 651–656 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. Yu. Samitov and R. Kh. Sadykov, Selective Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Times and the Conformation of Organic Compounds. Conformational Analysis of Heteroorganic Compounds [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983), pp. 262–307.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. R. Roman, J. A. McCammon, and B. D. Sykes, “A study of the distances obtained from nuclear magnetic resonance nuclear Overhauser effect and relaxation time measurements in organic structure determination. Distance involving internally rotating methyl groups. Application to cis- and trans-crotonaldehyde,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, No. 15, 4773–4777 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. Yu. Samitov, “Anomalous chemical shifts and conformation of cyclic sulfite and selenite esters,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 164, No. 2, 347–350 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Haslinger and R. M. Lynden-Bell, “Investigation of the internal rotation of methyl groups by T1 relaxation measurements,” J. Magn. Reson., 31, No. 1, 33–40 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. S. Hubbard, “Nonexponential relaxation of rotating three-spin systems in molecules of a liquid,” J. Chem. Phys., 52, No. 2, 563–568 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. A. Valiev and E. N. Ivanov, “Rotational Brownian motion,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 109, No. 1, 31–64 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Altona, H. J. Geise, and C. Romers, “The conformation of nonaromatic ring compounds. 32. The crystal structure of trimethylene sulfite at −100‡C,” Rec. Trav. Chim., 85, No. 11/12, 1197–1205 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. M. K. J. Bovee, J. Vriend, J. A. Peters, et al., “NMR relaxation of spin 1/2 nuclei in rigid parts of a molecule by dipolar interaction with reorienting CX3 groups and vice versa: Extension of theory and an application to spectral assignment and determination of barriers to methyl rotation,” Mol. Phys., 41, No. 4, 933–940 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. E. Woessner, “Nuclear magnetic dipole-dipole relaxation in molecules with internal motion,” J. Chem. Phys., 42, No. 6, 1855–1859 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. A. Arbuzov, E. N. Klimovitskii, and G. N. Sergeeva, “Stereochemistry of seven-membered heterocycles. 7. Synthesis and conformational analysis of diastereomeric 4,7-dimethylbenzo[e]-1,3-dioxepanes,” Zh. Obshch. Khim., 52, No. 11, 2418–2421 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kh. Sadykov, P. P. Chernov and Yu. Yu. Samitov, Correction of the Recovery of Nuclear Magnetization during Measurements of Longitudinal Relaxation in Single-Coil High-Resolution NMR Spectrometers with Fourier Transformation [in Russian], Moscow (1980), Dep. VINITI, No. 3411-80.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i éksperimental'naya Khimiya, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 603–610, September–October, 1986.

The authors express their gratitude to Academician B. A. Abruzov for constant interest in the work and to E. N. Klimovitskii for the synthesis of some of the investigated substances.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samitov, Y.Y., Sadykov, R.K. Stereospecificity in the proton magnetic relaxation rate of enantiotopic methyls and the methyl rotation barrier. Theor Exp Chem 22, 576–583 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00522544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00522544

Keywords

Navigation