Advertisement

Current Genetics

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 445–449 | Cite as

An adaptive response to alkylating agents in Aspergillus nidulans

  • P. Hooley
  • S. G. Shawcross
  • P. Strike
Original Articles

Summary

A simple method is described for demonstrating adaptation to alkylation damage in Aspergillus nidulans. One wild type, two MNNG-sensitive, and one MNNG-resistant strain all showed improvement in colony growth when challenged with MNNG following appropriate inducing pretreatments. Other alkylating agents (MMS, EMS) could also adapt mycelium to later MNNG challenge, while 4NQO and UV could not. The inducible effect was not transmissible through conidia. A standard reversion assay based upon methG proved impractical for studying mutation frequencies during alkylation treatments owing to variations in MNNG resistance amongst revertants.

Key words

Aspergillus nidulans DNA repair Induction Alkylating agents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson T, Clark AM (1966) Nature 210:593–595Google Scholar
  2. Clutterbuck AJ (1974) In: King RC (ed) Handbook of genetics, vol 1, pp 447–510Google Scholar
  3. Baker TI (1983) Mol Gen Genet 190G:295–299Google Scholar
  4. Howard CA, Baker TI (1986) Mol Gen Genet 203:462–467Google Scholar
  5. Hooley P, Shawcross SG, Strike P (1988) Mutat Res 193:247–254Google Scholar
  6. Jeggo P (1979) J Bacteriol 139:783–791Google Scholar
  7. Jeggo P, Defais M, Samson L, Schendel P (1977) Mol Gen Genet 157:1–9Google Scholar
  8. Kafer E (1987) Genetics 115:671–676Google Scholar
  9. Laval F, Laval J (1984) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1062–1066Google Scholar
  10. Lee MG, Yarranton GT (1982) Mol Gen Genet 185:245–250Google Scholar
  11. Lilly LJ (1965) Mutat Res 2:192–195Google Scholar
  12. Maga JA, McEntec K (1985) Mol Gen Genet 200:313–321Google Scholar
  13. Polakowska R, Perozzi G, Prakash L (1986) Curr Genet 10:647–655Google Scholar
  14. Pontecorvo G, Roper JA, Hemmons LM, McDonald KO, Bufton AWJ (1953) Adv Genet 5:141–238Google Scholar
  15. Rolfe M (1985a) Curr Genet 9:529–532Google Scholar
  16. Rolfe M (1985b) Curr Genet 9:533–538Google Scholar
  17. Samson L, Schwartz JL (1980) Nature 287:861–863Google Scholar
  18. Scott BR, Alderson T, Papworth DG (1973) J Gen Microbiol 75:235–239Google Scholar
  19. Sedgwick SG (1986) Microbiol Sci 3:76–83Google Scholar
  20. Sekiguchi M, Nakabeppu Y (1987) Trends Genet 3:51–54Google Scholar
  21. Siede W, Eckardt F (1984) Br J Cancer 49:103–106Google Scholar
  22. Soyfer VN (1987) Isr J Bot 36:1–14Google Scholar
  23. Swirski RA (1986) PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Swirski RA, Shawcross SG, Faulkner BM, Strike P (1988) Mutat Res 193:255–268Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Hooley
    • 1
  • S. G. Shawcross
    • 1
  • P. Strike
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations