Skip to main content
Log in

Nonempirical calculations on potential surfaces for gas-phase SN2 nucleophilic substitution reactions

  • Published:
Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry Aims and scope

Abstract

A method has been derived for the analytic description of potential surfaces in natural reaction coordinates as a preliminary stage in researching the dynamics of SN2-type reactions X+CH3Y→CH3X+Y; a potential surface is specified by the potential profile V(s) along the reaction path s, the dependence of the frequencies of the transverse vibrations ωs(s) on s, and the path curvature g(s). V(s) and ωs(s) have been constructed from nonempirical calculations in the 4–31G basis for the energies, geometrical parameters, and vibrational frequencies of the reactants, products, transitional states, and prereaction and postreaction complexes. The parameters of g(s) have been chosen from the condition for the reaction path to pass through all the stationary points on the potential surface. This way of describing a surface leaves adequate freedom for correcting the energy parameters by reference to thermochemical measurements, as well as for examining the effects of the parameters on the reaction dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. K. Tanaka, G. I. Mackay, J. D. Payzant, and D. K. Bohms, “Gas-phase reactions of anions with halogenated methanes at 297±2 K,” Can. J. Chem., 54, No. 10, 1643–1659 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. N. Olmstead and J. I. Brauman, “Gas-phase nucleophilic displacement reactions,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc, 99, No. 13, 4219–4228 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Pellerite and J. I. Brauman, “Intrinsic barriers in nucleophilic displacement,” Ibid, 102, No. 19, 5993–5999 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Dedieu and A. Veillard, “A comparative study of some SN2 reactions through ab initio calculations,” Ibid, 94, No. 19, 6730–6738 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. B. Schlegel, K. Mislow, F. Bernardi, and A. Bottoni, “An ab initio investigation into SN2 reaction: frontside attack versus backside attack in the reaction of F with CH3F,” Theor. Chim. Acta., 44, No. 3, 245–256 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Wolfe, D. J. Mitchell, and H. B. Schlegel, “Theoretical studies of SN2 transition states,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 103, No. 24, 7692–7694 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Urban, I. Cernusak, and V. Kellö, “Activation barriers of SN2 reactions: F+CH3F and H+CH3F. Fourth-order MB RSPT calculations,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 105, No. 6, 625–629 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. E. Bloom, P. J. Slingerland, and C. Altona, “Application of self-consistent field ab initio calculations to organic molecules. 1. Equilibrium structure and force constants of hydrocarbons,” Mol. Phys., 31, No. 5, 1359–1376 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. E. Bloom, L. P. Otto, and C. Altona, “Application of self-consistent field ab initio calculations to organic molecules. 3. Equilibrium structure of water, methanol and dimethyl ether, general valence field of water and methanol sealed on experimental frequencies,” Ibid, 32, No. 4, 1137–1179 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. D. Marcus, “On the analytical mechanics of chemical reactions. Quantum mechanics of linear collisions,” J. Chem. Phys., 45, No. 2, 4493–4500 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. V. Basilevsky, “Natural coordinates for polyatomic reactions,” Chem. Phys., 24, No. 1, 81–89 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Miller, N. C. Handy, and J. E. Adams, “Reaction path Hamiltonian for polyatomic molecules,” J. Chem. Phys., 72, No. 1, 99–112 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. G. Truhlar, W. L. Hase, and J. T. Hynes, “Current status of transition state theory,” ibid, 87, No. 15, 2664–2682 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Bowman, G.-Zh. Ju, and K. T. Lee, “Incorporation of collinear exact quantum reaction probabilities into three-dimensional transition state theory,” ibid, 86, No. 12, 2232–2239 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Glasstone, K. Laidler, and H. Eyring, Reaction Rate Theory [Russian translation], Izd. Inert. Lit., Moscow (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Eckart, “The penetration of a potential barrier by electrons,” Phya. Rev., 35, No. 11, 1303–1309 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. V. Basilevsky and V. M. Ryaboy, “Dynamics of linear exchange reactions. Quasiclassical model of high-energy vibrational inversion,” Chem, Phys., 41, No. 3, 477–488 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. C. Polanyi, “Some concepts in reaction dynamics,” Acc. Chem. Research, 5, No. 5, 161–168 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. V. Basilevsky and V. M. Ryaboy, “Quantum dynamics of linear triatomic reactions,” Adv. Quant. Chem., 15, 1–83 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Éksperimental'naya Khimiya, No. 3, pp. 271–280, May–June, 1986.

I am indebted to A, I. Beldyrev for providing the program for the quantum-chemical calculations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryaboi, V.M. Nonempirical calculations on potential surfaces for gas-phase SN2 nucleophilic substitution reactions. Theor Exp Chem 22, 253–260 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00521149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00521149

Keywords

Navigation