Advertisement

Pleural thickening: a comparison of oblique chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomography in subjects exposed to low levels of asbestos pollution

  • Jacques Ameille
  • Patrick Brochard
  • Jeanne Marie Brechot
  • Thierry Pascano
  • Anne Cherin
  • Alain Raix
  • Michèle Fredy
  • Jean Bignon
Article

Summary

The present study was conducted to investigate the value of oblique chest radiographs, compared with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), in the assessment of pleural asbestosis in a group of subjects exposed to low levels of asbestos pollution. The study population consisted of 23 people derived from a previously reported cohort of subjects working in university buildings insulated with asbestos-containing material. Subjects were selected on a voluntary basis from among patients whose initial oblique chest X-rays showed pleural thickening. Sixteen patients were maintenance workers occupationally exposed to asbestos; the remaining seven were environmentally exposed to asbestos. For each subject, two standard chest radiographs [posteroanterior (PA) and right anterior oblique (RAO) views] were taken and HRCT was performed. Films were interpreted after agreement by three chest physicians and a radiologist. Pleural thickening was considered present in all 23 patients on RAO films and in six patients on PA films. HRCT revealed unequivocal pleural plaques in three maintenance workers and doubtful pleural abnormalities in three other maintenance workers. Considering HRCT as the “gold standard,” the positive predictive value of RAO film was only 13%–26%. Most of the 17 false-positive diagnoses of pleural fibrosis were due to significant subpleural fat. These results suggest that the routine use of oblique radiographs as a screening test in cohorts of subjects exposed to low levels of pollution by asbestos should be reevaluated.

Key words

Asbestos Pleural thickening Plaque Oblique radiographs High-resolution computed tomography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Ray CS (1988) High resolution CT of benign asbestos-related diseases: clinical and radiographic correlation. AJR 151:883–891Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aberle DR, Gamsu G, Ray CS, Feuerstein IM (1988) Asbestos-related pleural and parenchymal fibrosis: detection with high resolution CT. Radiology 166:729–734Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al Jarad N, Poulakis N, Rubens MB, Pearson MC, Rudd RM (1991) Assessment of asbestos-induced pleural disease by computed tomography: correlation with chest radiograph and lung function. Respir Med 85:203–208Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker EL, Greene R (1982) Incremental value of oblique chest radiographs in the diagnosis of asbestos-induced pleural disease. Am J Ind Med 3:17–22Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Begin R, Boctor M, Bergeron D, Cantin A, Berthiaume Y, Peloquin S, Bisson G, Lamoureux G (1984) Radiographic assessment of pleuropulmonary disease in asbestos workers: posteroanterior, four view films, and computed tomograms of the thorax. Br J Ind Med 41:373–383Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohlig H, Calavrezos A (1981) Development, radiological zone patterns, and importance of diffuse pleural thickening in relation to occupational exposure to asbestos. Br J Ind Med 47:673–681Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourbeau J, Ernst J, Chrome J, Armstrong B, Becklake MR (1990) The relationship between respiratory impairment and asbestos-related pleural abnormality in an active work force. Am Rev Respir Dis 142:837–842Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourbeau J, Ernst J (1988) Between- and within-reader variability in the assessment of pleural abnormality using the ILO. 1980 — International classification of pneumoconiosis. Am J Ind Med 14:537–543Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brochard P, Ravault MC, Hirsch A, Amphoux M, Kaplan H, Bignon J (1984) Evaluation des expositions méconnues à l'amiante dans l'industrie du bâtiment XXI Congress on Occupational Health. Dublin, 9–14 September 1984. Abstract 337Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Churg A, Golden J (1982) Current problems in the pathology of asbestos-related disease. Pathol Annu 17:33–66Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cordier S, Lazar P, Brochard P, Bignon J, Ameille J, Proteau J (1987) Epidemiologic investigation of respiratory effects related to environmental exposure to asbestos inside insulated buildings. Arch Environ Health 42:303–309Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Craighead JE, Abraham JL, Churg A, Green FHY, Kleinerman J, Pratt PC (1982) The pathology of asbestos-associated disease of the lungs and pleural cavities: diagnostic criteria and proposed grading schema. Arch Pathol Lab Med 106:545–596Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedman AC, Fiel SD, Fischer MS, Radecki PD, Lev-Toaff AS, Caroline DF (1988) Asbestos-related pleural disease and asbestosis: a comparison of CT and chest radiography. AJR 150:269–275Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hillerdal G, Lindgren A (1980) Pleural plaques: correlation of autopsy findings to radiographic findings and occupational history. Eur J Respir Dis 61:315–319Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hosoda Y, Saito N, Hachiya J, Chiba Y, Chikauchi Y (1980) Differential diagnosis of asbestos-induced pleural thickening using computed tomography: a preliminary study. In: Wagner JC (ed) Biological effects of mineral fibers. JARC Publ. 30. IARC Lyon, pp 527–536Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Labour Office Guidelines for the use of ILO (1980) International classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis, revised edn. International Labour Office Occupational Safety and Health Series no. 22 (rev. 80). International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz D, Kreel L (1979) Computed tomography in pulmonary asbestosis. Clin Radiol 30:207–213Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kreel L (1976) Computed tomography in the evaluation of pulmonary asbestosis, preliminary experience with the EMI general purpose scanner. Acta Radiol Diagn 17:405–412Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mackenzie AF, Harries PG (1970) Changing attitudes to the diagnosis of asbestos disease. J R Nav Med Serv 56:116–123Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliver LC, Sprince NL, Greene R (1991) Asbestos-related disease in public school custodians. Am J Ind Med 19:303–316Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reger RB, Ames RG, Merchant JA, Polakoff PP, Sargent EN, Silbiger M, Whittlesey P (1982) The detection of thoracic abnormalities using postero-anterior (PA) vs PA and oblique roentgenograms. Chest 81:290–295Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sargent EN, Boswell WD, Ralls PW, Markovitz A (1984) Subpleural fat pads in patients exposed to asbestos: distinction from non-calcified pleural plaques. Radiology 152:273–277Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sebastien P, Gaudichet A, Dufour G, Bonnaud G, Bignon J, Goni J (1977) Enquête métrologique sur la pollution atmosphérique intérieure des bâtiments isolés par projection d'amiante. DDASS Paris: Laboratoire d'Etude des Particules InhaléesGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheers G, Rossitier CE, Gilson JC, Mackenzie FAF (1978) U.K. naval dockyards asbestosis study: radiological methods in the surveillance of workers exposed to asbestos. Br J Ind Med 35:195–203Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Svenes KB, Borgersen A, Haaversen O, Holten K (1986) Parietal pleural plaques: a comparison between autopsy and X-ray findings. Eur J Respir Dis 69:10–15Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sherman CB, Barnhart S, Rosenstock L (1988) Use of oblique chest roentgenograms in detecting pleural disease in asbestos exposed workers. J Occup Med 30:681–683Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Ameille
    • 1
  • Patrick Brochard
    • 1
  • Jeanne Marie Brechot
    • 1
  • Thierry Pascano
    • 1
  • Anne Cherin
    • 1
  • Alain Raix
    • 1
  • Michèle Fredy
    • 1
  • Jean Bignon
    • 1
  1. 1.Universités Paris V, Paris VI, Paris VII and INSERM, Unité 139CreteilFrance

Personalised recommendations