Summary
The effect of ethanol on yeast growth and fermentation has been studied in two strains, NCYC479 (a commercial saké yeast) and 5D-cyc (a laboratory haploid strain). The effect of ethanol on growth was similar in the two strains. It showed complex kinetics which resulted from both the inhibition of the growth rate itself and also a reduction in cell viability. The growth and viability effects had different inhibition constants. Ethanol was less inhibitory toward fermentation than toward growth. Fermentation in the saké yeast was more ethanol tolerant than in the laboratory strain. The inhibition kinetics for fermentation were less complex than those for growth and followed the classical noncompetitive pattern.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiba S, Shoda M, Nagatani M (1968) Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 10:845–864
Cysewski GR, Wilke CR (1978) Process design and economic studies of alternative fermentation methods for production of ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 20:1421–1444
DeDeken RH (1966) The Crabtree effect: a regulatory system in yeast. J Gen Microbiol 44:149–156
Gray WD (1941) Studies on the alcohol tolerance of yeasts J Bacteriol 42:561–574
Hayashida S, Feng DD, Hongo M (1974) Function of the high concentration alcohol-producing factor. Agric Biol Chem 38:2001–2006
Holzberg I, Finn RK, Steinkrans KH (1967) A kinetic study of the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice. Biotechnol Bioeng 9:413–427
Righelato RC (1980) Anaerobic Fermentation: alcohol production. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 290:303–312
Thomas DS, Hossack JA, Rose AH (1978) Plasma-membrane lipid composition and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol 117:239–245
Troyer JR (1953) A relation between cell multiplication and alcohol tolerance in yeasts. Mycologia 45:20–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, S.W., Oliver, S.G., Harrison, D.E.F. et al. Ethanol inhibition of yeast growth and fermentation: Differences in the magnitude and complexity of the effect. European J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11, 151–155 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00511253
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00511253