Summary
Human epidermis uncontaminated by fibroblasts was isolated by a suction blister method. DNA synthesis in short-time organ cultures of isolated epidermis was strongly inhibited by aphidicolin, suggesting that DNA polymerase α is involved in DNA replication in human epidermis. On the basis of their responses to inhibitors, primer-template requirements, and chromatographic properties, DNA polymerases α, β, and γ were all identified in epidermal extracts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cutright DE, Bauer H (1967) Cell renewal in the oral mucosa and skin of the rat. II. DNA conservation and reutilization during the renewal cycle in vivo and in tissue explants. Oral Surg 23:260–271
Fukuyama K, Bernstein IA (1961) Autoradiographic studies of the incorporation of 3H-thymidine into deoxyribonucleic acid in the skin of young rats. J Invest Dermatol 36:321–326
Hardt N, De Kegel D, VanHeule L, Villani G, Spadari S (1980) DNA polymerase γ, cytochrome c oxidase and mitochondrial intergrity in rabbit spleen lymphocytes stimulated with Concanavalin A. Exp Cell Res 127:269–276
Huberman JA (1981) New views of the biochemistry of eukaryotic DNA replication revealed by aphidicolin, an unusual inhibitor of DNA polymerase α. Cell 23:647–648
Ikegami S, Taguchi T, Ohashi M, Oguro M, Nagano H, Mano Y (1978) Aphidicolin prevents mitotic cell division by interfering with the activity of DNA polymerase α. Nature 275:458–460
Lachapelle JL, Gillman T (1969) Tritiated thymidine labelling of normal epidermal cell nuclei. Br J Dermatol 81:603–616
Kiistala U, Mustakallio KK (1967) Dermo-epidermal separation with suction: Electronmicroscopic and histochemical study of initial events of blistering in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 48:466–477
Krokan H, Schaffer P, DePamphilis ML (1979) Involvement of Eukaryotic deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases α and γ in the replication of cellular and viral deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 18:4431–4443
Krokan H, Wist E, Krokan RH (1981) Aphidicolin inhibits DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase α and isolated nuclei by a similar mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res 9:4709–4719
Longiaru M, Ikeda J, Jarkovsky Z, Horwitz SB, Horwitz MS (1979) The effect of aphidicolin on adenovirus DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 6:3369–3386
Pedrali-Noy G, Mazza G, Focher F, Spadari S (1980) Lack of mutagenicity and metabolic inactivation of aphidicolin by rat liver microsomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 93, 1094–1103
Pedrali-Noy G, Spadari S (1980) Aphidicolin allows a rapid and simple evaluation of DNA repair synthesis in damaged human cells. Mutation Res 70:389–394
Pedrali-Noy G, Spadari S, Miller-Faures A, Miller AOA, Kneppa J, Koch G (1980) Synchronization of HeLa cell cultures by inhibition of DNA polymerase α with aphidicolin. Nucleic Acids Res 8:377–387
Penneys NS, Fulton JE, Weinstein GD, Forst P (1970) Location of proliferating cells in human epidermis. Arch Dermatol 101:323–327
Reimer G, Zöllner EJ, Reitz M, Schwulera U, Leonhardi G: (1978) Comparison of DNase, DNa polymerase and RNA-polymerase activities present in the DNA-binding proteins of normal human dermis, epidermis, horny layer and psoriatic scales. Arch Dermatol Res 263:317–324
Schaffner W, Weissmann C (1973) A rapid, sensitive and specific method for determination of protein in dilute solutions. Anal Biochem 56:502–514
Spadari S, Weissbach A (1974) HeLa cell R-deoxy-ribonucleic acid polymerases. Separation and characterization of two enzymatic activities. J Biol Chem 249:5809–5815
Thorud E, Volden G (1980) Flow cytometry (FCM) of human epidermal cells. A preparation method for epidermal cells and demonstration of circadian variations in the proportion of S-phase cells. Arch Dermatol Res 269:137–145
Weissbach A (1977) Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Ann Rev Biochem 46:25–47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Erna and Olav Aakres Foundation for Cancer Research
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krokan, H., Volden, G. DNA replication in short-time organ cultures of human epidermis. Arch Dermatol Res 273, 97–101 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00509032
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00509032