Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Corynebacterium parvum-mediated inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation on the effector-and suppressor-lymphocyte response in contact allergy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The generation and/or expression of suppressor T lymphocytes (Ts) in contact allergy to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) is inhibited by treatment of BALB/c mice with C. parvum. It has been described that C. parvum injected intravenously (IV) or intraperitoneally (IP) suppresses lymphocytic responses via activated macrophages. In this investigation we compared Ts and T-effector lymphocytes of delayed hypersensitivity (TDH) inhibition and suppression of mitogen-induced spleen lymphocyte proliferation by C. parvum to find some correlation between these effects of C. parvum. Various times after IP injection of C. parvum BALB/c mice were tolerized (a) by an epicutaneous antigen overload, (b) by 2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNBSO3 IV, (c) by injection of Ts cells from tolerant donors, or (d) sensitized with an optimal dose (15 μl) of DNFB.

Suppressor and effector cell generation and/or function was assessed by sensitization (2×0.5% DNFB) and challenge at the right ear or by transfer of spleen cells from the C. parvum-treated or-untreated tolerized donor to the C. parvum-treated or-untreated recipient, followed by sensitization and challenge of the recipient. From the same pool of C. parvum-treated or-untreated animals, spleens were obtained, weights determined, spleen cells prepared, and mitogen (phythemagglutinin or concanavalin A)-induced lymphocyte proliferation measured.

The results show that C. parvum-mediated inhibition of Ts generation in the donor mice correlated — although not entirely — with suppression of mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation. Inhibition of Ts function in the recipient by C. parvum did not correlate with suppression of spleen lymphocyte proliferation, i.e., Ts function was inhibited up to 1 week only. Lymphocyte proliferation, however, was inhibited up to 3 weeks after C. Parvum injection. Sensitization of mice was inhibited by C. parvum shortly after injection; 1 week after C. parvum injection, no inhibition of contact sensitivity was observed. These results suggest that Ts-cell generation might be suppressed by a similar mechanism as described for suppression of lymphocyte proliferation, i.e., via suppressive factors released from C. parvum-activated macrophages, however, Ts-cell function appears not to be inhibited by this mechanism. T-effector cells of delayed hypersensitivity are very little affected by C. parvum-mediated suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DNFB:

2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene

DNBSO3 :

2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid

Ts :

suppressor T-lymphocyte

TDH :

T-effector lymphocyte of delayed hypersensitivity

References

  1. Knop J, Riechmann R, Macher E (1981) Modulation of suppressor mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. I. Effect of C. parvum on the induction phase of contact allergy. J Invest Dermatol (in press)

  2. Knop J, Riechmann R, Macher E (1981) Modulation of suppressor mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. II. Inhibition of suppressor T-lymphocytes by C. parvum. J Invest Dermatol (in press)

  3. Sljivic VS, Watson SR (1977) The adjuvant effect of Corynebacterium parvum: T-cell dependence of macrophage activation. J Exp Med 145:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott MT (1972) Biological effects of the adjuvant Corynebacterium parvum. II. Evidence for macrophage-T cell interaction. Cell Immunol 5:469–479

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phanuphak P, Moorhead JW, Claman HN (1974) Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. 1. In vivo detection by ear swelling and correlation with in vitro cell stimulation. J Immunol 112:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirchner H, Holden HT, Herberman RB (1975) Splenic suppressor macrophages induced in mice by injection of Corynebacterium parvum. J Immunol 115:1212–1216

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sy MS, Miller SD, Claman HN (1977) Immune suppression with supraoptimal doses of antigen in contact sensitivity to DNFB. J Immunol 119:240–244

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirchner H, Glaser M, Herberman RB (1975) Suppression of cell-mediated tumor-immunity by Corynebacterium parvum. Nature 257:396–398

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee K-C, Berry D (1977) Functional heterogeneity in macrophages activated by Corynebacterium parvum: characterization of subpopulations with different activities in promoting immune responses and suppressing tumor cell growth. J Immunol 118:1530–1540

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sy MS, Miller SD, Kowack HB, Claman HN (1977). A splenic requirement for the generation of suppressor cells. J Immunol 119:2095–2099

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gemsa D, Steggemann L, Till G, Resch K (1977) Enhancement of the PGE1 response of macrophages by concanavalin A and colchicine. J Immunol 119:524

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann C, Sorg C (1977) Immune interferon. I. Production by lymphokine-activated murine macrophages. Eur J Immunol 7:719–725

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lopatin DE, Ranney DF (1977) Maintenance of the resting state and potential regulators of the proliferate phase. In: Lucas DO (ed) Regulatory mechanisms in lymphocyte activation. Academic Press, pp 195–218

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knop, J., Riechmann, R. & Macher, E. Effect of Corynebacterium parvum-mediated inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation on the effector-and suppressor-lymphocyte response in contact allergy. Arch Dermatol Res 273, 15–23 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00509023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00509023

Key words

Navigation