Water Resources Management

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 279–302 | Cite as

An evaluation of flood forecasting, warning and response systems in the European Union

  • Dennis Parker
  • Maureen Fordham


This paper presents results from the EUROflood research project sponsored by the European Commission under the EPOCH programme. The paper evaluates levels of development of flood forecasting, warning and response systems (FFWRS) in the European Union with reference to riverine and tidal floods in The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Portugal. An experimental evaluation methodology, comprising fourteen criteria and five development stages, is used to evaluated FFWRS. Flood forecasting is the starting point, but the research addresses entire FFWRS. Despite advances in flood forecasting, FFWRS often under-perform because warning dissemination and response are unsatisfactory.

FFWRS have developed in response to different water resource management problems, varying flood characteristics and different historic, cultural and institutional factors. FFWRS for flood defence and flood emergency response are the main focus, but they are also important for navigation, bridge clearance, fishing, recreation and industry. France, parts of Germany, The Netherlands and England and Wales have relatively mature FFWRS. FFWRS are much less well developed in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Portugal, and important areas for enhancement are identified in all countries. Cross-country and within-country comparisons reveal the potential for knowledge transfer, although ultimately the unique circumstances of each country places limits upon this process.

Key words

floods forecasting warnings evaluation France Germany The Netherlands Portugal United Kingdom 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ChattertonJ. B.: 1994, FFWRS Country Reports: The Netherlands. In M.Fordham, C. H.Green, A.Herring, A.Ketteridge, D.Parker and E. C.Penning-Rowsell, (eds) EUROflood: Flood Forecasting, Warning and Response Systems, Technical Annex, 3.3.1-3.3.32, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlexes University, Enfield.Google Scholar
  2. Delegation Aux Risques Majeurs: 1992, Prevention des risques naturels et technologiques majeurs: annees 1988 a 1990, Ministere de l'Environnement/DEPPR, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.Google Scholar
  3. FriesenC.: 1993, Selecting Tools for the Emergency Notification Toolbox, Carpe Diem, Vol, 1 No. 2, The Intern. Emerg. Management and Eng. Soc., U.S.A.Google Scholar
  4. FordhamM., GreenC., HerringA., KetteridgeA. M., ParkerD. J. and Penning-RowsellE. C.: 1994, Technical Annex for the Flood Foresasting and Warning Module, EUROflood I, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Enfield.Google Scholar
  5. HandmerJ. W. and Penning-RowsellE. C.: 1990, Hazards and the Communication of Risk, Gower Technical Press, Aldershot, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Institut National De La Consommation: 1993, Inondations, October, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. KrzysztofowiczR. and DavisR.: 1983, A methodology for evaluation of flood forecast-response systems, Water Resour. Res. 19(6) 1423–1454.Google Scholar
  8. Landerarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser: 1993, Vergleichende Ubersicht uber den gegenwartigen Stand des Hochwassermeldedienstes in Deutschland, Stausbericht.Google Scholar
  9. Marshall, C. T.: 1991, River flood forecasting-state of the art review, National Rivers Authority, Project C2 (90) 1, Bristol.Google Scholar
  10. McLuckieB. J.: 1973, The warning system in disaster situations: a selective analysis, Disaster Research Center Research Series No 9, Ohio, U.S.A.: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  11. Parker, D. J.: 1991, Flood Disasters in Britain: Lessons from Flood Hazard Research, Paper presented at Conference on the Changing Face of Europe, Disasters, University of Bradford, U.K.Google Scholar
  12. ParkerD. J. and NealJ.: 1990, Evaluating the performance of flood warning systems. In J. W.Handmer and E. C.Penning-Rowsell (eds) Hazard and the Communication of Risk, Gower Technical Press, Aldershot, U.K., pp. 137–156.Google Scholar
  13. Parker, D. J., Von Lany, P. and Taylor, K.: 1992, Flood defence emergency response: national levels of service, National Rivers Authority, R&D Note 106, Bristol.Google Scholar
  14. ParkerD. J., FordhamM., PortouJ. and TapsellS.: 1994, The flood risk to London: a preliminary scoping study, Metropolitan Police Service, New Scotland Yard, London.Google Scholar
  15. Penning-RowsellE. C. and ChattertonJ. B.: 1977, The Benefits of Flood Alleviation: A Manual of Assessment Techniques, Gower Technical Press, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  16. Penning-RowsellE. C. and FordhamM.: 1994, Floods across Europe, Middlesex University Press, Enfield.Google Scholar
  17. Philips Geographical Digest 1994–95: 1994, Heinemann-Philips, London.Google Scholar
  18. Rocha, J., Saraiva, M. da G. and Correia, F. N. (1993) Flood hazard management in Portugal, in EUROflood Project, 1st Annual Report, March, Middlesex University, 135–138.Google Scholar
  19. RocheP. A.: 1989, The French Policy for Prevention of Flood Damage, In Hydrology of Disasters, Procs. of Technical Conference held in Geneva, November 1988, James and James, London, 69–83.Google Scholar
  20. SmithD. I. and HandmerJ. W. (eds) 1986, Flood warning in Australia, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. The Economist: 1995, The drowned heart of Europe, 4 February, 39–40, The Economist, London.Google Scholar
  22. Torterotot, J. P.: 1993, Le cout des dommages dus aux inondations: estimation et analyse des incertitudes. Thés'e de doctorat, L'Ecole Nationale des Ponts at Chaussees, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  23. TunstallS. M.: 1992, The flood warning systems and the flood events of January and February 1990 in Maidenhead and other locations with the western area of the NRA Thames Region, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Enfield.Google Scholar
  24. Welsh Affairs Committee: 1990, The breach of the sea defences of 26/27 February along the North Wales coast, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  25. WilliamsH. B.: 1964, Human factors in warning-and-response sytems. In G.Grosser, H.Wechsler and M.Greenblatt (eds) The Threat of Impending Disaster: Contributions to the Psychology of Stress. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press, Cambridge, Mass, U.S.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Parker
    • 1
  • Maureen Fordham
    • 1
  1. 1.Flood Hazard Research CentreMiddlesex UniversityEnfieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations