Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of living spermatogenic cells of the mouse by transillumination-phase contrast microscopic technique for ‘in situ’ analyses of DNA polymerase activities

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The stages of spermatogenesis can be identified in freshly isolated, unstained adult mouse seminiferous tubules using a transillumination method. Late acrosome- and maturation phase spermatids, arranged in bundles at stages XII–VI give rise to a spotty transillumination pattern. Before spermiation, these cells form a continuous layer on the top of the seminiferous epithelium, recognized by a strong homogeneous central light absorption in the freshly isolated seminiferous tubules at stages VII and VIII. Other stages have a pale light absorption pattern. The accurate determination of the developmental stages of the germ cells was based on the morphology of the developing acrosomic system and of the nuclei of the spermatids, as revealed by phase contrast microscopy. Using this procedure, the activity levels of DNA polymerases α and β have been studied by autoradiography of squash preparations. Using endogenous templates, assay conditions that differentiate between the solubilized DNA polymerases α and β in vitro, were used to distinguish between these activities in situ in different stages of mouse spermatogenesis. Except in very late spermatids shortly before spermiation, DNA polymerases α and β were detectable in all cell types examined. Coinciding with the nuclear protein transitions, elongating spermatids at steps 10–12 and maturation phase spermatids at steps 13–14 showed high DNA polymerase activities. As no replication occurs in these cells, the observations support the view that both DNA polymerases α and β could be involved in repair DNA synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calvin HI, Kosto B, Williams-Ashman HG (1967) Enzymic incorporation of deoxyribonucleosides into DNA in mammalian testes. Arch Biochem Biophys 118:670–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrocchi G, Jose JG, Linn S (1979) Further characterization of a cell-free system for measuring replicative and repair DNA synthesis with cultured human fibroblasts and ecidence for the involvement of DNA polymerase α in DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1205–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenberg HJ, Anderson S, DePamphilis ML (1978) Involvement of DNA polymerase α in Simian virus 40 DNA replication. J Biol Chem 253:3273–3280

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes SR Jr, Meistrich ML, Platz RD, Hnilica LS (1977) Nuclear protein transitions in rat testis spermatids.Exp Cell Res 110:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Grippo P, Geremia R, Locorotondo G, Monesi V (1978) DNA-dependent DNA polymerase species in male germ cells of the mouse. Cell Differ 7:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht NB, Farrell D, Davidson D (1976) Changing DNA polymerase activities during the development of the testis in the mouse. Dev Biol 48:56–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht NB, Farrell D, Williams JL (1979) DNA polymerases in mouse spermatogenic cells separated by sedimentation velocity. Biochim Biophys Acta 561:358–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht NB, Parvinen M (1981) DNA synthesis catalyzed by endogenous templates and DNA-dependent DNA polymerases in spermatogenic cells from rat. Exp Cell Res (in press)

  • Hobart PM, Infante AA (1978) A low molecular weight DNA polymerase β in the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. J Biol Chem 253:8229–8238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikegami S, Taguchi T, Oguro M, Nagano H, Mano Y (1978) Aphidicolin prevents mitotic cell division by interfering with the activity of DNA polymerase α. Nature 275:458–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman-Alfaro S, Chandley AC (1970) Meiosis in the male mouse. An autoradiographic investigation. Chromosoma 31:404–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblond CP, Clermont Y (1952) Definition of the stages of the cycle of the siminferous epithelium in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 55:548–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Meistrich ML, Reid BO, Barcellona WJ (1975) Meiotic DNA synthesis during mouse spermatogenesis. J Cell Biol 64:211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Monesi V (1962) Autoradiographic study of DNA synthesis and the cell cycle in spermatogonia and spermatocytes of mouse testis using tritiated thymidine. J Cell Biol 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Monesi V (1965) Synthetic activities during spermatogenesis in the mouse. RNA and protein. Exp Cell Res 39:197–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakberg EF (1956) A description of spermiogenesis in the mouse and its use in analysis of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and germ cell renewal. Am J Anat 99:391–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto B, Fanning E (1978) DNA polymerase α is associated with replicating SV 40 nucleoprotein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 5:1715–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvinen M, Marana R, Robertson DM, Hansson V, Ritzén EM (1980) Functional cycle of rat Sertoli cells: Differential binding and action of follicle stimulating hormone at various stages of the spermatogenic cycle. In: Steinberger A, Steinberger E (eds) Testicular development, structure and function. Raven Press, New York, pp 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvinen M, Vanha-Perttula T (1972) Identification and enzyme quantitation of the stages of the seminiferous epithelial wave in the rat. Anat Rec 174:435–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe M, Chevaillier P (1980) Study of dogfish (Schyliohinus caniculus) DNA polymerases α and β (extraction, separation, characterization, and changes during spermatogenesis). Biochem J 189:635–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzén EM, Boitani C, Parvinen M (1981) Cyclic secretion of proteins by the rat seminiferous tubule, depending on the stage of spermatogenesis. Int J Androl (Suppl) 3:57–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AW (1969) Techniques of autoradiography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 253–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Sega GA (1979) Unscheduled DNA synthesis (DNA repair) in the germ cells of male mice—its role in the study of mammalian mutagenesis. Genetics 92:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström K-O, Parvinen M (1976a) RNA synthesis in different stages of rat seminiferous epithelial cycle. Mol Cell Endocrinol 5:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström K-O, Parvinen M (1976b) RNA synthesis during male meiotic prophase in the rat. Hereditas 82:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani G, Spadari S, Boiteux S, Defais M, Caillet-Fauquet P, Radman M (1978) Replication of chemically modified DNA. Biochimie 60:1145–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbach A (1979) The functional roles of mammalian DNA polymerase. Arch Biochem Biophys 198:386–396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parvinen, M., Hecht, N.B. Identification of living spermatogenic cells of the mouse by transillumination-phase contrast microscopic technique for ‘in situ’ analyses of DNA polymerase activities. Histochemistry 71, 567–579 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00508382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00508382

Keywords

Navigation