Histochemistry

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 559–565 | Cite as

Effects of different fixative solutions on labeling of Concanavalin-A receptor sites in human T-lymphocytes

  • J. Renau-Piqueras
  • E. Knecht
  • J. Hernández-Yago
Article

Summary

We have studied the effect of several fixative solutions on the number of Concanavalin-A·(Con-A) receptor sites of human peripheral blood T-lymphocytes. Cells treated with different fixative solutions (glutaraldehyde (G); formaldehyde (F);G+F; osmium tetroxide (Os); Os+G; Os+F; and Os+G+F) were labeled with a Con-A gold labeled horseradish peroxidase (HRP) complex and the number of gold particles on the lymphocytic surface was evaluated. Comparison of cells treated with the different fixatives used showed significant differences in the density of labeling. After G fixation the number of gold particles was lower than after fixation with Os or F. Moreover, G used in combination with F or Os reduced the labeling obtained when the two latter fixatives were used alone.

Keywords

Public Health Gold Formaldehyde Glutaraldehyde Horseradish Peroxidase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman GA, Freeman WH (1979) Membrane differentiation of developing hemic cells of the bone marrow demonstrated by changes in concanavalin A surface labeling. J Histochem Cytochem 27:1413–1423Google Scholar
  2. Bona C (1975) Physiological significance of the lymphocyte cell coat. Biomedicine 22:97–104Google Scholar
  3. Carson F, Lynn JA, Martin JH (1972) Ultrastructural effect of various buffers, osmolality, and temperature on paraformaldehyde fixation of the formed elements of blood and bone marrow. Tex Rep Biol Med 30:125–142Google Scholar
  4. De Bruijn WC, Den Breejen P (1975) Glycogen, its chemistry and morphological appearence in the electron microscope. II. The complex formed in the selective contrast staining of glycogen. Histochem J 7:205–225Google Scholar
  5. De Bruijn WC, van Buitenen JMH (1980) X-ray microanalysis of aldehyde-fixed glycogen contrast-stained by OsVI. FeII and OsVI. RuIV complexes. J Histochem Cytochem 28:1242–1250Google Scholar
  6. De Petris (1978) Nonuniform distribution of Concanavalin-A receptors and surface antigens on uropod-forming thymocytes. J Cell Biol 79:235–251Google Scholar
  7. Fahimi HD, Drochmans P (1965) Essais de standardisation de la fixation au glutaraldéhyde. I. Purification et détermination de la concentration du glutaraldéhyde. J Microscopie 4:725–735Google Scholar
  8. Frens G (1973) Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold solutions. Nature (Phys Sci) 241:20–25Google Scholar
  9. Gillet R, Gull K (1976) Glutaraldeyde- Its purity and stability. Histochemie 30:162–167Google Scholar
  10. Glauert AM (1974) Fixation, dehydration and embedding of biological specimens. In: Glauert AM (ed) Pratical methods in electron microscopy, vol 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 5–72Google Scholar
  11. Greaves MF, Brown G (1974) Purification of human T and B lymphocytes. J Immunol 112:420–423Google Scholar
  12. Hay DH, Hasty DL (1979) Extrusion of particle-free membrane blisters during glutaraldehyde fixation. In: Rash JE, Hudson CS (eds) Freeze-fracture. Methods, artifacts and interpretation. Raven Press, New York, pp 59–66Google Scholar
  13. Hayat MA (1970) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy. vol 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 5–107Google Scholar
  14. Hernández-Yago J, Knecht E, Grisolia S (1980) (Abstract) Immunocytochemical localization of mitochondrial enzymes. Eur J Cell Biol 22:282Google Scholar
  15. Hirsch JG, Fedorko ME (1968) Ultrastructure of human leukocytes after simultaneous fixation with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide and “postfixation” in uranyl acetate. J Cell Biol 38:615–627Google Scholar
  16. Hopwood D (1970) The reactions between formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide, and their fixation effects on bovine serum albumin and on tissue blocks. Histochemie 24:150–157Google Scholar
  17. Inbar M, Huet C, Oseroff AR, Ben-Bassat H, Sachs L (1973) Inhibition of lectin agglutinability by fixation of the cell surface membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 31:594–599Google Scholar
  18. Knutton S, Jackson D, Graham JM, Micklem KJ, Pasternak CA (1976) Microvilli and cell swelling. Nature 262:52–54Google Scholar
  19. Luft JH (1976) The structure and properties of the cell surface coat. Int Rev Cytol 45:291–382Google Scholar
  20. Mathieu O, Claassen H, Weibel ER (1978) Differential effect of glutaraldehyde and buffer osmolarity on cell dimension: A study on lung tissue. J Ultrastruct Res 63:20–34Google Scholar
  21. Moyne G (1974) Mise en evidence de l'ADN par la réaction au Schiff-Thallium. J Microscopie 21:205–208Google Scholar
  22. Nermut MV, Ward BJ (1974) Effect of fixatives on fracture plane in red blood cells. J Microsc (Oxford) 102:29–39Google Scholar
  23. Pollard TD, Ito S (1970) Cytoplasmics filaments of Amoeba proteus. I. The role of filaments in cosistency changes and movement. J Cell Biol 46:267–289Google Scholar
  24. Renau-Piqueras J, Cervera J (1979) Alteration of the cell surface morphology in human T-rosetting lymphocytes. An ultrastructural study. Acta Haematol 62:185–190Google Scholar
  25. Renau-Piqueras J, Knecht E (1979) Freeze-fracture and scanning eletron microscopy of lymphocytes. Effect of different preparatory techniques on the cell surface morphology. Israel J Med Sci 15:660–667Google Scholar
  26. Renau-Piqueras J, Miguel A, Knecht E (1980a) Effects of preparatory techniques on the fine structure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. II. Effect of glutaraldehyde osmolarity. Mikroskopie 36:65–80Google Scholar
  27. Renau-Piqueras J, Knecht E, Miguel A, Hernández J (1980b) (Abstract) Effects of different fixatives on the fine structure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. In: Broderoo P, de Priester W (eds) Procd. seventh european congress on electron microscopy. The Hague. vol 2. Seventh Eur Congr Electr Microsc Foundt, Leiden, pp 750–751Google Scholar
  28. Renau-Piqueras J, Knecht E, Miguel A, Hernández J (1980c) Effects of preparatory techniques on the fine structure of human peripheral blood lympocytes. III. Effect of different fixative solutions. Mikroskopie 38 (In press)Google Scholar
  29. Renau-Piqueras J, Martinez-Rámón A, Grisolia S (1981) Effects of carbamylation by cyanate on normal and stimulated human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Afr J Clin Exp Immunol 2:137–144Google Scholar
  30. Santer VB (1977) The surface coat of lymphocytes. In: Marchalonis JJ (ed) The lymphocyte. Structure and function. Part II. Marcel Dekker, New York Basel, pp 541–564Google Scholar
  31. Schmalbruch H (1980) Delayed fixation alter the pattern of intramembranous particles in mammalian muscle fibers. J Ultrastruct Res 70:15–20Google Scholar
  32. Stolinski C, Breathnach AS, Bellairs R (1977) Effect of fixation on cell membrane of early embryonic material as observed on freeze-fracture replicas. J Microscopie 112:293–299Google Scholar
  33. Temmink HM (1979) Application of cytochemical methods to electron microscope investigation of cell surface receptors. Biol Cell 36:227–236Google Scholar
  34. Trump BF, Bulger RE (1966) New ultrastructural characterictics of cells fixed in a glutaraldehyde —osmium mixture. Lab Invest 15:368–374Google Scholar
  35. Vlodavsky I, Inbar M, Sachs L (1973) Membrane changes and adenosine triphosphatase content in normal and malignant transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:1780–1784Google Scholar
  36. White DL, Andrews SB, Faller JW, Barrnett RJ (1976) The chemical nature of osmium tetroxide fixation and staining of membranes by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 436:577–586Google Scholar
  37. White DL, Mazurkiewicz JE, Barrnett RJ (1979) A chemical mechanism for tissue staining by osmium tetroxide-ferrocyanide mixtures. J Histochem Cytochem 27:1084–1091Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Renau-Piqueras
    • 1
  • E. Knecht
    • 2
  • J. Hernández-Yago
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones CitológicasValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesStanfor UniversityStanforUSA

Personalised recommendations