Drug absorption by the rat jejunum perfused in situ

Dissociation from the pH-partition theory and role of microclimate-pH and unstirred layer
  • M. L. Högerle
  • D. Winne
Article

Summary

In anaesthetized rats the rate of appearance of benzoic acid and aminopyrine in jejunal venous blood was measured; the pH of the luminal perfusion solution was varied between 4 and 10.5. The pH-absorption curves were less steep than predicted by the unmodified pH-partition theory. A reduction of the mucosal unstirred layer thickness by means of the segmented-flow technique considerably increased the absorption rate without essentially changing the shape of the pH-absorption curves. The pH at the surface of the jejunal mucosa was 6.0, 6.5, 6.6, and 8.0 for luminal solutions of pH 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.8, respectively. From the absorption data the microclimate-pH was calculated which would explain best the observed pH-absorption curves. These calculated pH-values correspond well to the values measured at the mucosal surface. Therefore, it was concluded that a microclimate-pH caused the deviation of the intestinal pH-absorption curves of benzoic acid and aminopyrine from the prediction of the unmodified pH-partition theory. The mucosal unstirred layer represented only a considerable permeation resistance and was not responsible for the deviating shape of the pH-absorption curves.

Key words

Intestinal drug absorption pH-Absorption curves Unstirred layer Microclimate-pH 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amidon GL, Kou J, Elliott RL, Lightfoot EN (1980) Analysis of models for determining intestinal wall permeabilities. J Pharm Sci 69:1369–1373Google Scholar
  2. Atkins GL (1981) Mean solute concentration for use with the Michaelis-Menten equation applied to the analysis of data from intestinal perfusion experiments. Biochim Biophys Acta 649:143–145Google Scholar
  3. Beckett AH, Moffat AC (1968) The influence of alkyl substitution in acids on their performance in the buccal absorption test. J Pharm Pharmacol 20 Suppl: 239S-247SGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair JA, Lucas ML, Matty AJ (1975) Acidification in the rat proximal jejunum. J Physiol (Lond) 245:333–350Google Scholar
  5. Crank J (1974) The mathematics of diffusion, Clarendon Press, Oxford, p62Google Scholar
  6. Crouthamel WG, Tan GH, Dittert LW, Doluisio JT (1971), Drug absorption. IV. Influence of pH on absorption kinetics of weakly acidic drugs. J Pharm Sci 60:1160–1163Google Scholar
  7. Daniel C, Wood FS (1971) Fitting equations to data. Wiley-Interscience, New York, p 17 and p 193Google Scholar
  8. Debnam ES, Levin RJ (1975) Effects of fasting and semistarvation on the kinetics of active and passive sugar absorption across the small intestine in vivo. J Physiol (Lond) 252:681–700Google Scholar
  9. Fisher RB, Gardner MLG (1974) A kinetic approach to the study of absorption of solutes by isolated perfused small intestine. J Physiol (Lond) 241:211–234Google Scholar
  10. Hartley HO (1961) The modified Gauss-Newton method, for the fitting on non-linear regression functions by least squares. Technometrics 3:269–280Google Scholar
  11. Higuchi WI, Ho NFH, Park JY, Komiya I (1981) Rate-limiting steps and factors in drug absorption. In: Prescott LF, Nimmo WS (eds) Drug absorption. MIT Press, Lancaster, pp 33–60Google Scholar
  12. Ho NFH, Higuchi WI (1971) Quantitative interpretation of in vivo buccal absorption of n-alkanoic acids by the physical model approach. J Pharm Sci 60:537–541Google Scholar
  13. Hogben CAM, Schanker LS, Brodie BB (1957) Mechanism of intestinal absorption of drugs. Fed Proc 16:307–308Google Scholar
  14. Hogben CAM, Tocco DJ, Brodie BB, Schanker LS (1959) On the mechanism of intestinal absorption of drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 125:275–282Google Scholar
  15. Högerle ML (1982) Abweichung der Arzneimittelresorption im Dünndarm der Ratte in vivo von der pH-Partitionstheorie: Grenzschicht- und/oder Mikroklima-Effekt? Dissertation, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität TübingenGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson MJ, Shiau YF, Bane S, Fox M (1974) Intestinal transport of weak electrolytes. J Gen Physiol 63:187–213Google Scholar
  17. Jackson MJ, Tai CY, Steane JE (1981) Weak electrolyte permeation in alimentary epithelia. Am J Physiol 240:G191-G198Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs MH (1940) Some aspects of cell permeability to weak electrolytes. Cold Spring Habor Symp Quant Biol 8:30–39Google Scholar
  19. Kakemi K, Arita T, Hori R, Konishi R, Nishimura K, Matsui H, Nishimura T (1969) Absorption and excretion of drugs. XXXIV. An aspect of the mechanism of drug absorption from the intestinal tract in rats. Chem Pharm Bull 17:255–261Google Scholar
  20. Koizumi T, Arita T, Kakemi K (1964) Absorption and excretion of drugs. XX. Some pharmacokinetic aspects of absorption and excretion of sulfonamides. (2) Absorption from rat small intestine. Chem Pharm Bull 12:421–427Google Scholar
  21. Kunze H, Blinne K, Vogt W (1971) Intestinal absorption of a monoquaternary drug, 14C-neostigmine Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 270:161–168Google Scholar
  22. Lovering EG, Black DB (1974) Diffusion layer effects on permeation of phenylbutazone through polydimethylsiloxane. J Pharm Sci 63:1399–1402Google Scholar
  23. Lucas M (1977) pH or hydrogen-ion concentration in statistics? Lancet II:826Google Scholar
  24. Lucas ML, Lei FH, Blair JA (1980) The influence of buffer pH, glucose and sodium ion concentration on the acid microclimate in rat proximal jejunum in vitro. Pflügers Arch 385: 137–142Google Scholar
  25. Lucas ML, Schneider W, Haberich FJ, Blair JA (1975) Direct measurement by pH-microelectrode of the pH microclimate in rat proximal jejunum. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 192:39–48Google Scholar
  26. Nimmerfall F, Rosenthaler J (1980) Significance of the goblet-cell mucin layer, the outermost luminal barrier to passage through the gut wall. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 94:960–966Google Scholar
  27. Nogami H, Matsuzawa T (1961) Studies on absorption and excretion of drugs. I. Kinetics of penetration of acidic drug, salicylic acid, through the intestinal barrier in vitro. Chem Pharm Bull 9:532–546Google Scholar
  28. Nogami H, Matsuzawa T (1962) Studies on absorption and excretion of drugs. II. Kinetics of penetration of basic drug, aminoyprine, through the intestinal barrier in vitro. Chem Pharm Bull 10:1055–1060Google Scholar
  29. Rechkemmer G, Wahl M, Kuschinsky W, von Engelhardt W (1979) pH-Microclimate at the surface of the intestine in guinea-pig and rat. Pflügers Arch 382:S: R31Google Scholar
  30. Sakata T, von Engelhardt W (1979) Mucin layer in the large intestine. Ann Rech Vet 10:485–487Google Scholar
  31. Soergel KH (1971) Flow measurements of test meals and fasting contents in the human small intestine. In: Demling L, Ottenjann R (eds) Gastrointestinal motility, Thieme, Stuttgart and Academic Press, New York, pp 81–95Google Scholar
  32. Suzuki A, Higuchi WI, Ho NFH (1970a) Theoretical model studies of drug absorption and transport in the gastrointestinal tract I J Pharm Sci 59:644–651Google Scholar
  33. Suzuki A, Higuchi WI, Ho NFH (1970b) Theoretical model studies of drug absorption and transport in the gastrointestinal tract II. J Pharm Sci 59:651–659Google Scholar
  34. Teorell T, Stenhagen E (1938) Ein Universalpuffer für den pH-Bereich 2,0 bis 12,0. Biochem Z 299:416–419Google Scholar
  35. Weber E (1967) Grundriß der biologischen Statistik. 6 Ed. Fischer, Stuttgart, p229Google Scholar
  36. Wilke CR, Chang P (1955) Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. Am Inst Chem Eng J 1:264–270Google Scholar
  37. Winne D (1977) Shift of pH-absorption curves. J Pharmacokin Biopharm 5:53–94Google Scholar
  38. Winne D (1978a) Dependence of intestinal absorption in vivo on the unstirred layer. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 304:175–181Google Scholar
  39. Winne D (1978b) The permeability coefficient of the wall of a villous membrane. J Math Biol 6:95–108Google Scholar
  40. Winne D (1978c) Blood flow in intestinal absorption models. J Pharmacokin Biopharm 6:55–78Google Scholar
  41. Winne D (1979) Rat jejunum perfused in situ: Effect of perfusion rate and intraluminal radius on absorption rate and effective unstirred layer thickness. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 307:265–274Google Scholar
  42. Winne D, Markgraf, I (1979) The longitudinal intraluminal concentration gradient in the perfused rat jejunum and the appropriate mean concentration for calculation of the absorption rate. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 309:271–279Google Scholar
  43. Winne D, Remischovsky J (1971) Der Einfluß der Durchblutung auf die Resorption von Harnstoff, Methanol und Äthanol aus dem Jejunum der Ratte. Naunyn-Schmideberg's Arch Pharmacol 268:392–416Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Högerle
    • 1
  • D. Winne
    • 1
  1. 1.Abtellung für MolekularpharmakologiePharmakologisches Institut der UniversitätTübingen 1Germany

Personalised recommendations