Marine Biology

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 171–180 | Cite as

The near-bottom shrimp faunas (Decapoda: Natantia) at two abyssal sites in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean

  • P. Domanski


Bottom and near-bottom decapod shrimp communities from two northeast Atlantic abyssal sites (ca. 4 040 and 5 440m) were examined in 1984 and 1985. In both cases, an increase in abundance was observed in the bottom 90 m of the water column, with the largest numbers of shrimps occurring closest to the sediment surface (10 to 25 m off the bottom). The benthopelagic communities were composed of species drawn from both pelagic and benthic habitats rather than being specific and discrete. Hymenodora glacialis was the dominant species at the shallower site but it was absent from the near-bottom samples at the deeper one. H. acanthitelsonis, however, occurred at both sites. Several new depth records have been established, and there are two recordings of species previously unknown to the eastern Atlantic basin. Vertical migration and differences in modes of reproduction are discussed.


Migration Water Column Sediment Surface Dominant Species Atlantic Ocean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Alcock, A. W.: A descriptive catalogue of the Indian deep-sea Macrura and Anomala in the Indian Museum. Being a revised account of the deep-sea species collected by the royal Indian marine survey ship “Investigator”, 286 pp Calcutta: Trustees of the Indian Museum 1901Google Scholar
  2. Angel, M. V. and A. de C. Baker: Vertical distribution of the standing crop of plankton and micronekton in the Northeast Atlantic. Biol. Oceanogr. 2, 1–30 (1982)Google Scholar
  3. Bate, C. S.: Report on the Crustacea Macrura collected by H.M.S. “Challenger” during the years 1873–76. Rep. scient. Results Voyage HMS Challenger. (Ser. Zool.) 24, 1–94 (1888)Google Scholar
  4. Bouvier, E. L.: Crustaces decapodes (peneides) provenant des campagnes de l'“Hirondelle” et de la “Princess Alice” (1886–1907). Résult. Camp. scient. Prince Albert I 33, 1–122 (1908)Google Scholar
  5. Burkenroad, M. D.: The Aristaeinae, Solenocerinae and pelagic Penaeidinae of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection. Bull. Bingham. oceanogr. Coll. 5, 1–151 (1936)Google Scholar
  6. Chace, F. A.: The bathypelagic caridean Crustacea plankton of the Bermuda oceanographic expeditions. IX. Zoologica, N.Y. 25, 117–209 (1940)Google Scholar
  7. Chace, F. A.: The deep-sea prawns of the family Oplophoridae in the Bingham Oceanographic Collection. Bull. Bingham oceanogr Coll. 11, 1–51 (1947)Google Scholar
  8. Coutière, H.: Sur les crevettes Eucyphotes recueillés en 1910 au moyen du filet Bourrée, par la “Princess Alice”. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 152, 265–266 (1911)Google Scholar
  9. Crosnier, A. and J. Forest: Les crevettes profondes de l'Atlantique oriental tropical. Faune trop: O.R.S.T.O.M. 19, 1–409 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Elliot, A. J. and S. A. Thorpe: Benthic observations on the Madeira Abyssal Plain. Oceanol. Acta 6, 463–466 (1983)Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, C. J.: The effects of proximity to the continental slope seabed on pelagic halocyprid ostracods at 49°N, 13°W. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 65, 923–949 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. Faxon, W.: The stalk-eyed Crustacea, reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central and South America, and off the Galápagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. fish commission steamer “Albatros” during 1891, Leut. Commander Z. L. Tanner, U.S.N., commanding. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard 18, 1–192 (1895)Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, W. D.: Fluxes, dynamics and chemistry of particulates in the ocean, 405 pp. Ph.D. dissertation, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution/Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1977Google Scholar
  14. Gardner, W. D. and L. G. Sullivan: Benthic storms: temporal variability in a deep ocean nephaloid layer. Science, N.Y. 213, 329–331 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. Gore, R. H.: Abyssobenthic and abyssopelagic penaeoidean shrimp (families Aristaeidae and Penaeidae) from the Venezuela Basin, Caribbean Sea. Crustaceana 49, 119–138 (1985a)Google Scholar
  16. Gore, R. H.: Bright colors in the realm of eternal night. Sea Front. 31, 264–271 (1985b)Google Scholar
  17. Grice, G. D.: The existance of a bottom-living calanoid copepod fauna in deep water with descriptions of five new species. Crustaceana 23, 219–242 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Grice, G. D. and K. Hulsemann: Abundance, and vertical distribution taxonomy of calanoid copepods at selected stations in the northeast Atlantic. J. Zool., Lond. 146, 213–262 (1965)Google Scholar
  19. Grice, G. D. and K. Hulsemann: Bathypelagic calanoid copepods of the western Indian Ocean. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 122, 1–67 (1967)Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, P. M.: The distribution of Decapoda (Crustacea) in the open ocean and near-bottom over an adjacent slope in the northern North-east Atlantic during Autumn 1979. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 64, 829–857 (1984)Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, P. M.: The distribution of Mysidacea in the open ocean and near-bottom over the slope regions in the northern North-east Atlantic during 1979. J. Plankton Res. 7, 241–262 (1985 a)Google Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, P. M.: The vertical distribution of Decapoda, Euphausiacea, and Mysidacea at 42°N 17°W. Biol. Oceanogr. 3, 431–464 (1985 b)Google Scholar
  23. Heldt, J. H.: Les larves peneides du plankton du Xauen. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Commn int. Explor. Mer Méditerr. 13, 233–235 (1956)Google Scholar
  24. Honjo, S.: Material fluxes and modes of sedimentation in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones. J. mar. Res. 38, 53–97 (1980)Google Scholar
  25. Isaacs, J. D. and R. Schwartzlose: Active animals of the sea floor. Scient. Am. 233, 84–91 (1975)Google Scholar
  26. Karl, D. M., P. A. La Rock, J. W. Morse and W. Sturges: Adenosine triphosphate in the North Atlantic Ocean and its relationship to the oxygen minimum. Deep-Sea Res. 23, 81–88 (1976)Google Scholar
  27. Kensley, B. F.: Deep-sea decapod Crustacea from west of Cape Point, South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 50, 283–323 (1968)Google Scholar
  28. Kikuchi, T. and M. Omori: Vertical distribution and migration of oceanic shrimps at two locations off the Pacific coast of Japan. Deep-Sea Res. 32, 837–851 (1985)Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, N. B. and N. R. Merrett: The existence of a benthopelagic fauna in the deep-sea. In: A voyage of discovery, pp 483–498. Ed. by M. V. Angel. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1977Google Scholar
  30. Merrett, N. R.: On the identity and pelagic occurrence of larval and juvenile stages of rattail fishes (family Macrouridae) from 60°N, 20°W and 53°N, 20°W. Deep-Sea Res. 25, 147–160 (1978)Google Scholar
  31. Merrett, N. R. and N. B. Marshall: Observations on the ecology of deep-sea bottom-living fishes collected off northwest Africa (08°–27°N). Prog. Oceanogr. 9, 185–244 (1981)Google Scholar
  32. Omori, M. and S. Ohta: The use of underwater camera in studies of vertical distribution and swimming behaviour of a sergestid shrimp, Sergia lucens. J. Plankton Res. 3, 107–121 (1981)Google Scholar
  33. Pearre, S., Jr.: Problems of detection and interpretation of vertical migration. J. Plankton Res. 1, 29–44 (1979)Google Scholar
  34. Pérez-Farfante, I.: Morphological study of diagnostic characters in western Atlantic Hepomadus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). Fish. Bull. U.S. 71, 441–453 (1973)Google Scholar
  35. Roberts, T. W. and W. E. Pequegnat: Deep-water decapod shrimps of the family Penaeidae. In: Contributions on the biology of the Gulf of Mexico, pp 21–57. Ed. by W. E. Pequegnant and F. A. Chace, Jr. Houston Texas: Gulf Publishing Co. 1970Google Scholar
  36. Roe, H. S. J.: Observations of the diurnal vertical migrations of an oceanic animal community. Mar. Biol. 28, 99–113 (1974)Google Scholar
  37. Roe, H. S. J. and E. Darlington: A new acoustic control system for deep pelagic trawling close to the sea bed. Adv. Underwat. Technol. 11, 2–6 (1985)Google Scholar
  38. Roe, H. S. J. and D. M. Shale: A new multiple rectangular midwater trawl (RMT1+8M) and some modifications to the Institute of Oceanographic Sciences' RMT1+8. Mar. Biol. 50, 283–288 (1979)Google Scholar
  39. Saunders, P. M. and K. J. Richards: Benthic boundary layer, IOS observational and modelling programme, Final Report, January 1985, 61 pp. Wormley, Godalming, Surrey: Institute of Oceanographic Sciences 1985. (Rep. No. 199)Google Scholar
  40. Sivertsen, E. and L. B. Holthuis: Crustacea Decapoda (the Penaeidea and Stenopodidea excepted). Rep. scient. Results Michael Sars N. Atlant. deep Sea Exped. 5, 3–54 (1956)Google Scholar
  41. Smith, S. I.: On some new or little known Decapoda Crustacea, from recent fish commission dredgings off the east coast of the United States. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 7, 493–511 (1885)Google Scholar
  42. Smith, S. I.: On some new or little known Decapoda Crustacea, from recent fish commission dredgings off the east coast of the United States, during the summer and autumn of 1884. Rep. U.S. Commnr Fish. 13, 605–706 (1986)Google Scholar
  43. Springer, S. and H. R. Bullis, Jr.: Collections by the ‘Oregon’ in the Gulf of Mexico. Spec. scient. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. 196, 1–134 (1956)Google Scholar
  44. Vinogradov, M. E.: Vertical distribution of the oceanic zooplankton, 339 pp. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.S.R., Institute of Oceanography 1968. [Translated into English by the Israel Programme for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, 1970]Google Scholar
  45. Wasmer, R. A.: A new species of Hymenodora (Decapoda, Oplophoridae) from the Northeastern Pacific. Crustaceana 22, 87–91 (1972)Google Scholar
  46. Wishner, K. F.: The biomass of the deep-sea benthopelagic plankton. Deep-Sea Res. 27 A, 203–216 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Domanski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Oceanographic SciencesGodalmingEngland

Personalised recommendations