Advertisement

International Journal of Thermophysics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 535–544 | Cite as

Environmental regulations on chlorofluorocarbons

  • J. S. Hoffman
  • J. B. Wells
Article

Abstract

In August 1988, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued final regulations that implement the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. The regulations require a 50% reduction in consumption of fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) within 10 years and a freeze on consumption of halons within 4 years. The Montreal Protocol provisions were designed in September 1987 based on the results of a 2-year international series of scientific, technical, and economic workshops. As would be expected, scientific investigations continued during this period. While these investigations suggested that significant global depletion had already occurred, these preliminary findings were not taken into account during negotiations or rulemaking. In March 1988, however, the international Ozone Trends Panel confirmed the findings. Depletion greater than that projected under the Montreal Protocol has already occurred. An early reassessment of the Protocol provisions appears to be inevitable. Restrictions on CFCs will affect the refrigeration and air-conditioning industries. Emerging alternatives to CFCs include newly developed refrigerants, innovative designs, and engineering controls. Key issues in evaluating these alternatives include energy efficiency, capital costs, service to consumers, and compatibility with existing designs.

Key words

chlorofluorocarbons freons ozone layer refrigerants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    World Meteorological Organization, Atmospheric Ozone 1985. Assessment of Our Understanding of the Processes Controlling its Present Distribution and Change, WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 16 (WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations Environment Programme, Ad Hoc Scientific Meeting to Compare Model Generated Assessments of Ozone Layer Change for Various Strategies for CFC Control, Wurzburg, FRG (9–10 April 1987), UNEP/WG.167/INF.1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Assessing the Risks of Trace Gases that can Modify the Stratosphere, EPA400/1-87/001 (U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., 1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Regulatory Impact Analysis: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone (U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., 1987).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ozone Trends Panel Findings. Executive Summary (NASA, Washington, D.C., 1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fed. Register 52(239):47486 (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. P. Nelson, Findings of the Chlorofluorocarbon Chemical Substitutes International Committee, EPA-600/9-88-009 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C., 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chemical Manufacturers Association, Atmospheric Ozone: Response to Combined Emissions of CFCs, N2O, CH4, and CO2, Prepared for the United Nations Workshop on the Control of Chlorofluorocarbons, Leesburg, Va. (8–12 Sept. 1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. S. Connell, A Parameterized Numerical Fit to Total Column Ozone Changes Calculated by the LLNL 1-D Model of the Troposphere and Stratosphere (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., 1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Brasseur and A. DeRudder, The Potential Impact of Atmospheric Ozone and Temperature of Increasing Trace Gas Concentrations, Final report to the Commission of the European Communities, Contract 85-B6602-11-010-11-N (EEC, Brussels, Belgium, 1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. S. Isaksen and F. S. Stordal, J. Geophys. Res. 91(D8):5249 (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. S. Huffman and M. G. Gibbs, Future Concentrations of Stratospheric Chlorine and Bromine, EPA Report #400/1-88/005 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Hoffman
    • 1
  • J. B. Wells
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of Air and RadiationU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashington, D.C.USA
  2. 2.The Bruce CompanyWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations