Advertisement

International Journal of Thermophysics

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 73–86 | Cite as

Chemical potential prediction in realistic fluid models with scaled particle theory

  • D. M. Pfund
  • L. L. Lee
  • H. D. Cochran
Article

Abstract

A procedure frequently proposed in the literature for calculating chemical potentials relies on the Kirkwood charging process. Numerical problems associated with coupling large repulsive forces can be avoided by estimating the contribution to the chemical potential due to these forces with scaled particle theory. The contribution due to soft repulsive forces and attractive forces can be calculated with the Kirkwood charging process using distribution functions for a test particle obtained from integral equation theories. We have used the accurate HMSA theory of Zerah and Hansen to provide distribution functions in mixtures of Lennard-Jones molecules, and we have used the PYP theory of Lee to scale the distribution functions over the charging process. The theory provides accurate estimates of chemical potentials over a range of densities from gas-like to liquid-like when the reduced temperature kT/ɛ is greater than 2. Accurate results for excess free energy changes of mixing are also obtained at these conditions. At lower temperatures accurate results are obtained for low to moderate reduced densities (ρσ3⩽0.5).

Key words

chemical potential Kirkwood charging process Lennard-Jones fluid scaled particle theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Reiss, H. L. Frisch, and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 31:369 (1959).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Reiss, in Advances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 9, I. Prigogine, ed. (Interscience, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. L. Frisch, in Advances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 6, I. Prigogine, ed. Interscience New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. L. Lebowitz, E. Helfand, and E. Praestgaard, J. Chem. Phys. 43:774 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Reiss, H. L. Frisch, E. Helfand, and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 32:119 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Ben-Naim, Solvation Thermodynamics (Plenum Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. D. Eley, Trans. Faraday Soc. 35:1281 (1938).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. G. Kirkwood, J. Chem. Phys. 3:300 (1935).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Zerah andJ. Hansen, J. Chem. Phys. 84:2336 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. L. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 62:4436 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Mansoori, N. Carnahan, K. Starling, and T. Leland, J. Chem. Phys. 54:1523 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. J. Aider, J. Chem. Phys. 40:2724 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. J. Nicolas, K. E. Gubbins, W. B. Streett, and D. J. Tildesley, Mol. Phys. 37:1429 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, U. W. Suter, and R. C. Reid, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 25:525 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. P. Shukla and J. M. Haile, Mol. Phys. 62:617 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. C. Andersen, J. D. Weeks, and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. A 4:1597 (1971).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Lado, Phys. Rev. A 8:2548 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Pfund
    • 1
  • L. L. Lee
    • 1
  • H. D. Cochran
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Chemical Technology DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations