Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology

, Volume 331, Issue 4, pp 359–363 | Cite as

Distribution of fentanyl in rats: an autoradiographic study

  • Ernst Schneider
  • Kay Brune
Article

Summary

Unexpected respiratory depression reported to have occurred up to 2 h after neurolept analgesia with fentanyl has been proposed to be a redistribution phenomenon due to a gastro-entero systemic recirculation of fentanyl sequestered in the stomach. In the study presented here, this redistribution hypothesis was tested by employing whole-body autoradiography (WBAR) in two series of time-course experiments, designated to further elucidate the distribution of intravenously administered fentanyl which was radiolabelled in different parts of the molecule respectively. However, there was no evidence of a secondary accumulation of radioactivity in the brain. The possibility that fentanyl trapped in the stomach may be reabsorbed as it passes throgh the small intestines was investigated by intragastric administration of the drug. Its oral bioavailability was found to be only 1.5%. Also, evidence of a strong metabolic effect was obtained by analysis employing high performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC). In conclusion, the results obtained from this work do not support the hypothesis that the fentanyl rebound effect is due to a secondary rise in brain levels of the parent drug and its major metabolites, an event which could be brought about by reabsorption of fentanyl sequestered in the stomach.

Key words

Fentanyl distribution Fentanyl metabolism Fentanyl rebound Autoradiography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams AP, Pybus DA (1978) Delayed respiratory depression after use of fentanyl during anaesthesia. Br Med [Clin Res] 1:278–279Google Scholar
  2. Appelgren LE, Terenius L (1973) Difference in the autoradiographic localization of labelled morphine-like analgesics in the mouse. Acta Physiol Scand 88:175–182Google Scholar
  3. Becker CD, Paulson BA, Miller RD, Severinghaus JW, Eger EI (1976) Biphasic respiratory depression after fentanyl-droperidol or fentanyl alone used to supplement nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 44:291–296Google Scholar
  4. Henderson GL, Frincke J (1975) Antibodies to fentanyl. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 192:489–496Google Scholar
  5. Hess R, Herz A, Friedel K (1971) Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in view of the importance for limiting the effect. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 179:474–484Google Scholar
  6. Janssen C; Research Lab (1964) Patent FR. M 2430 (Cl A 61 KC 07 d) Apr 27 (ref CA 62: P 14635 a)Google Scholar
  7. Lehmann KA, Möseler G, Daub D (1981) Biotransformation von Fentanyl. I. In-vitro Abbau durch Gewebe der Maus. Anaesthesist 30:461–466Google Scholar
  8. Lehmann KA, Freier J, Daub D (1982) Fentanyl-Pharmakokinetik und postoperative Atemdepression. Anaesthesis 31:111–118Google Scholar
  9. Lehmann KA, Hunger L, Brandt K, Daub D (1983) Biotransformation von Fentanyl. III. Einflüsse chronischer Arzneimittel-exposition auf Verteilung, Metabolismus und Ausscheidung bei der Ratte. Anaesthesist 32:165–173Google Scholar
  10. Schneider E, Brune K; Opoid activity and biodistribution of fentanyl metabolites. (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Stoecke H, Hengstmann JH, Schüttler J (1979) Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl as a possible explanation for recurrence of respiratory depression. Br J Anaesth 51:741–744Google Scholar
  12. Stoeckel H, Schüttler J, Magnussen H, Hengstmann JH (1982) Plasma fentanyl concentrations and the occurrence of respiratory depression in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 54:1087–1095Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernst Schneider
    • 1
  • Kay Brune
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of Erlangen/NürnbergErlangenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations