Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology

, Volume 314, Issue 3, pp 267–270 | Cite as

A comparison of the actions of acetylcholine and bradykinin on the guinea pig ileum

  • Michael L. Roberts
Article

Summary

Procaine (8.5×10−5 M) inhibited the action of acetylcholine but not that of bradykinin on the guinea pig ileum. Attempts were made to identify the difference in stimulus-response coupling which would explain this difference in sensitivity. The responses to both agonists were dependent upon the presence of Ca2+ in the extracellular fluid, were inhibited to approximately the same extent by the addition of 0.25 mM Mn2+ to the bathing fluid and were equally sensitive to reduction in Na+ concentration of the extracellular fluid. Neither acetylcholine nor bradykinin could provoke ileal contraction when Sr2+ was substituted for Ca2+. Thus there was no indication of the difference in the stimulus-response pathways for the two agonists which must exist to explain the differential sensitivity to procaine.

Key words

Guinea pig ileum Acetylcholine Bradykinin Procaine Calcium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blaustein MP, Goldman DE (1966) Competitive action of calcium and procaine on lobster axon. A study of the mechanism of action of certain local anaesthetics. J Gen Physiol 49:1043–1063Google Scholar
  2. Bury RW, Mashford ML (1976) Interactions between local anesthetics and spasmogens on the guinea-pig ileum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 197:633–640Google Scholar
  3. Hurwitz L, Joiner PD, Von Hagen S (1967) Calcium pools utilized for contraction in smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 213:1299–1304Google Scholar
  4. Jones LM, Cockeroft S, Michell RH (1979) Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol turnover in various tissues by cholinergic and adrenergic agonists, by histamine and by caerulin. Biochem J 182:669–676Google Scholar
  5. Marier SH, Putney JW Jr, Van de Walle CM (1978) Control of calcium channels by membrane receptors in the rat parotid gland. J Physiol (Lond) 279:141–151Google Scholar
  6. Michell RH, Jafferji SS, Jones LM (1976) Receptor occupancy dose-response curve suggests that phosphatidylinositol breakdown may be intrinsic to the mechanism of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor. FEBS Lett 69:1–5Google Scholar
  7. Putney JW Jr (1977) Muscarinic, alpha-adrenergic and peptide receptors regulate the same calcium influx sites in the parotid gland. J Physiol (Lond) 268:139–149Google Scholar
  8. Rosenberger LB, Ticku MK, Triggle DJ (1979) The effects of Ca2+ antagonists on mechanical responses and Ca2+ movements in guinea pig ileal longitudinal smooth muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 57:333–347Google Scholar
  9. Seeman P (1972) The membrane actions of anesthetics and tranquillizers. Pharmacol Rev 24:583–655Google Scholar
  10. Weinstock M, Weiss C (1979) Effects of procaine and extracellular calcium on the responses of rat stomach fundus muscle to acetylcholine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. Br J Pharmacol 65:593–599Google Scholar
  11. Weiss GB, Goodman FR (1969) Effects of lanthanum on contraction, calcium distribution and 45Ca movements in intestinal smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 169:46–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations