Isolation of an anaerobic cellulolytic mixed culture
- 21 Downloads
Isolation and enrichment cultures were made for anaerobic cellulose utilizing micro-organisms from non-ruminant sources. Stable mixed cultures were developed which degraded pure cellulose (wet-milled filter paper) in a defined mineral salts medium. Components of the mixed cultures lost viability in monoculture when grown on cellulose. Growth on cellulose was stimulated at low oxygen concentrations, when increased cellulase activity and increased volatile fatty acid production occurred.
Low concentrations (0.1–3 mM) of cellobiose, and to a lesser extent, glucose stimulated solubilization of cellulose by the cultures, but higher concentrations had an inhibitory effect.
Growth on cellulose was accompanied by production of acetic, propionic and butyric acids. The production and profile of the acids was stable and characteristic of the culture. When an ‘open’ nonaseptic fermentation was employed, the fatty acid profile was variable and also included valeric acid.
KeywordsCellulose Fermentation Cellulase Cellobiose Mixed Culture
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ballentine R (1957) Determination of total nitrogen and ammonia. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (eds) Methods in enzymology III. Academic Press, New York, pp 984–995Google Scholar
- Bengt V, Hofsten BB, Beskow S (1971) Arch Microbiol 79:69–79Google Scholar
- Breuil C, Kushner DJ (1976) Can J Microbiol 22:1776–1781Google Scholar
- Enari TM, Markkanen P (1977) Adv Biochem Eng 5:25–48Google Scholar
- Enebo L (1949) Nature 163:805Google Scholar
- Fell BF, Kay M, Whitelaw FG, Boyne R (1968) Res Vet Sci 9:458–466Google Scholar
- Ghose TK (1977) Adv Biochem Eng 6:39–76Google Scholar
- Halliwell G, Griffin M (1973) Biochem J 135:587–594Google Scholar
- Hofsten V, Berg B, Beskow S (1971) Arch Microbiol 79:69–79Google Scholar
- Humphrey AE, Aviniger WA, Lee E, Moreira A (1976) Fifth International Fermentation Symposium BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hungate RE, Bryant MP, Mah RA (1964) Annu Rev Microbiol 18:131–166Google Scholar
- Hungate RE (1975) Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:39–67Google Scholar
- Mandels M, Weber J (1969) Adv Chem Ser 95:391–414Google Scholar
- Mann SO (1968) J Appl Bacteriol 31:241–244Google Scholar
- Packett LV, McCune RW (1965) Appl Microbiol 13:22–27Google Scholar
- Prins RA, Vugt F van, Hungate RE, Vorstenbosch CJAHV van (1972) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; Microbiol Serol 38:153–161Google Scholar
- Reese ET, Siu RGH, Levinson HS (1950) J Bacteriol 59:485–491Google Scholar
- Svinivason VR (1975) In Symposium on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Aulanko, Finland, SITRA, Helsinki, pp 393–405Google Scholar
- Summer JB (1925) J Biol Chem 65:393–395Google Scholar
- Toerein DF, Siebert ML, Hattingh WHJ (1967) Water Res 1:497–507Google Scholar
- Toerein DF, Hattingh WHJ (1969) Water Res 3:385–416Google Scholar
- Whistler RL, Smart CL (1952) Polysaccharide chemistry. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wilke CR (1975) Cellulose as a chemical and energy resource. Symposium No. 5. Biotechnol Bioeng. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Weiner PJ, Zeikus JG (1977) Appl Environ Microbiol 33:289–297Google Scholar
- Wood TM (1968) Biochem J 109:217–227Google Scholar