Histochemistry

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 543–555 | Cite as

Differentiation of fiber types in skeletal muscle from the sequential inactivation of myofibrillar actomyosin ATPase during acid preincubation

  • P. D. Gollnick
  • D. Parsons
  • C. R. Oakley
Article

Summary

A method is described for identifying fiber types of skeletal muscle from several mammalian species on the basis of the sequential inactivation of myofibrillar actomyosin ATPase during acid preincubation. When this method is used in combination with the standard alkaline preincubation at least 5 types of fibers can be identified. Of these, 2 are type I fibers with those of the slow twitch soleus muscle being different from those that exist in mixed muscles. The 3 subtypes of type II fibers exist independent of their metabolic properties. The need for careful standardization of histochemical methods for the visualization of myofibrillar actomyosin ATPase and the implication of the existence of different fiber types in apparently homogeneous muscle for the preparation of antibodies used for immunocytochemical methods of fiber identification are discussed.

Keywords

Public Health Skeletal Muscle Mammalian Species Careful Standardization Fiber Type 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong RB, Saubert CW, IV, Seeherman HJ, Taylor CR (1982) Distribution of fiber types in locomotory muscles of dogs. Am J Anat 163:87–98Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore CR, Kikuchi T, Doerr L (1978) Some observations on the innervation patterns of different types of chick muscle. Exp Neurol 58:272–284Google Scholar
  3. Billeter R, Heizmann CW, Howald H, Jenny E (1981) Analysis of myosin light and heavy chain types in single human skeletal muscle fibers. Eur J Biochem 116:389–395Google Scholar
  4. Brooke MH, Kaiser KK (1969) Some comments on the histochemical characterization of muscle adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem 17:431–432Google Scholar
  5. Brooke MH, Kaiser KK (1970) Three “myosin adenosine triphosphatase” systems: the nature of their pH lability and sulfhydryl dependence. J Histochem Cytochem 18:670–672Google Scholar
  6. Brooke MH, Kaiser KK (1974) The use and abuse of muscle histochemistry. Ann NY Acad Sci 228:121–144Google Scholar
  7. Bronson DD, Schachat FH (1982) Heterogeneity of contractile proteins. J Biol Chem 257:3937–3944Google Scholar
  8. Brown GL, von Euler US (1938) The after effects of a tetanus on mammalian muscle. J Physiol 93:39–60Google Scholar
  9. Burke RE, Levine DN, Salcman M, Tsaris P (1973) Motor units in cat soleus muscle: Physiological histochemical, and morphological characteristics. J Physiol 238:723–748Google Scholar
  10. Close RI, Hoh JFY (1969) Post-tetanic potentiation of twitch contractions of cross-innervated rat fast and slow muscles. Nature 221:179–181Google Scholar
  11. d'Albis A, Pantaloni C, Bechet J-J (1982) Myosin isoenzymes in adult rat skeletal muscles. Biochimie 64:399–404Google Scholar
  12. Fitzsimons RB, Hoh JFY (1981) Isomyosins in human type 1 and type 2 skeletal muscle fibres. Biochem J 193:229–233Google Scholar
  13. Gauthier GF, Lowey S (1979) Distribution of myosin isoenzymes among skeletal muscle fiber types. J Cell Biol 81:10–25Google Scholar
  14. Green HJ, Reichmann H, Pette D (1982) A comparison of two ATPase based schemes for histochemical muscle fibre typing in various mammals. Histochemistry 76:21–31Google Scholar
  15. Guth L, Samaha FJ (1969) Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscle. Exp Neurol 25:138–152Google Scholar
  16. Guth L, Samaha FJ (1970) Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. Exp Neurol 28:365–367Google Scholar
  17. Hayashi M, Feiman D (1966) An improved method of fixation for formalin sensitive enzymes with special reference to myosin adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem 14:577–581Google Scholar
  18. Hoh JFY (1979) Developmental changes in chicken skeletal myosin isoenzymes. FEBS Lett 98:269–270Google Scholar
  19. Hintz CS, Lowry CV, Kaiser KK, McKee D, Lowry OH (1980) Enzyme levels in individual rat muscle fibers. Am J Physiol 239:C58-C65Google Scholar
  20. Kugelberg E (1976) Adaptive transformation of rat soleus muscle motor units during growth. J Neurol Sci 27:269–289Google Scholar
  21. Lowry CV, Kimmey JS, Felder S, Chi MM-Y, Kaiser KK, Passoneau PN, Kirk KA, Lowry OH (1978) Enzyme patterns in single human muscle fibers. J Biol Chem 253:8269–8277Google Scholar
  22. Mabuchi K, Sréter FA (1979) Actomyosin ATPase II. Fiber typing by histochemical ATPase reaction. Muscle Nerve 3:233–239Google Scholar
  23. Müntener M (1979) Variable pH dependence of the myosin-ATPase in different muscles of the rat. Histochemistry 62:299–304Google Scholar
  24. Novikoff AF, Schin W, Drucker J (1961) Mitochondrial localization of oxidation enzymes: staining result with two tetrazolium salts. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:47–61Google Scholar
  25. Padykula HA, Herman E (1955) The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem 3:170–195Google Scholar
  26. Pette D, Schnez U (1977) Myosin ligh chain patterns of individual fast and slow-twitch fibres of rabbit muscles. Histochemistry 54:97–107Google Scholar
  27. Pette D, Spamer C (1979) Metabolic subpopulations of muscle fibers. Diabetes 28:(Suppl 1) 25–29Google Scholar
  28. Pierobon-Bormioli S, Sartore S, Dalla Libera L, Vitadello M (1981) “Fast” isomyosins and fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Histochem Cytochem 29:1179–1188Google Scholar
  29. Reichmann H, Pette D (1982) A comparative microphotometric study of succinate dehydrogenase activity levels in type I, IIa and IIb fibres of mammalian and human muscles.Histochemistry 74:27–41Google Scholar
  30. Seidel JC (1967) Studies on myosin from red and white skeletal muscles of the rabbit. II. Inactivation of myosin from red muscles under mild alkaline conditions. J Biol Chem 242:5623–5629Google Scholar
  31. Sickles DW, McLendon RE, Rosenquist TH (1982) Alternative method for quantitative enzyme histochemistry of muscle fibers. Histochemistry 75:577–588Google Scholar
  32. Snow DH, Billeter R, Mascarello F, Carpene E, Rowlerson A, Jenny E (1982) No classical type IIB fibres in dog skeletal muscle. Histochemistry 75:53–65Google Scholar
  33. Soukup T, Vydra J, Cerný M (1979) Changes in ATPase and SDH reactions of the rats extrafusal and intrafusal muscle fibres after preincubations at different pH. Histochemistry 60:71–84Google Scholar
  34. Spamer C, Pette D (1980) Meteabolic subpopulations of rabbit skeletal muscle fibres. In: Pette D (ed) Plasticity of muscle. W. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 19–30Google Scholar
  35. Spurway NC (1981) Interrelationship between myosin-based and metabolism-based classifications of skeletal muscle fiber. J Histochem Cytochem 29:87–88Google Scholar
  36. Wattenberg LW, Leong JL (1960) Effect of coenzyme Q10 and menadione on succinate dehydrogenase activity as measured by tetrazolium salt reduction. J Histochem Cytochem 8:269–303Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Gollnick
    • 1
  • D. Parsons
    • 1
  • C. R. Oakley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Education for MenWashington State University PullmanWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations