Advertisement

Histochemistry

, Volume 86, Issue 4, pp 379–383 | Cite as

The immunohistochemical location of cathepsin L in rabbit skeletal muscle

Evidence for a fibre type dependent distribution
  • M. A. J. Taylor
  • R. E. almond
  • D. J. Etherington
Article

Summary

The immunohistochemical location of cathepsin L in rabbit soleus, plantaris and psoas muscles was investigated using the peroxidase-anti-peroxidase (PAP) technique. The amount of enzyme detected varied according to the fibre type, which were identified by histochemical staining of serial sections for succinate dehydrogenase and alkali-stable myosin ATPase. In the three muscles studied labelling was strongest in the highly oxidative fibres and weaker in the other fibre types with least staining in the fast white fibres. Immunoreactive cathepsin L appeared to be most concentrated at the periphery of muscle fibres, especially near to the nuclei, although some staining was seen throughout the fibres.

Keywords

Public Health Skeletal Muscle Muscle Fibre Succinate Serial Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates PC, Millward DJ (1983) Myofibrillar protein turnover. Biochem J 214:587–592Google Scholar
  2. Bird JWC (1975) Skeletal muscle lysosomes. In: Dingle JT, Dean RT (eds) Lysosomes in biology and pathology, vol 4. North Holland American Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 75–109Google Scholar
  3. Bird JWC, Carter JH (1980) Proteolytic enzymes in striated and non-striated muscle. In: Wildenthal K (ed) Degradative processes in heart and skeletal muscle. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 51–85Google Scholar
  4. Canonico PG, Bird JWC (1970) Lysosomes in skeletal muscle tissue; zonal centrifugation eivdence for multiple cellular sources. J Cell Biol 45:321–333Google Scholar
  5. Dolbeare F, Vanderlaan M (1979) A fluorescent assay of proteinases in cultured mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 27:1493–1495Google Scholar
  6. Etherington DJ, Wardale RJ (1982) The mononuclear cell population in rat leg skeletal muscle: Its contribution to the lysosomal enzyme activities of whole muscle extracts. J Cell Sci 58:139–148Google Scholar
  7. Etherington DJ, Pugh D, Silver IA (1981) Collagen degradation in an experimental inflammatory lesion; studies on the role of the macrophage. Acta Biol Med Germ 40:1625–1636Google Scholar
  8. Etherington DJ, Mason RW, Taylor MAJ, Wardale RJ (1984) Production of a monospecific antiserum to cathepsin L: The histochemical location of enzyme in rabbit fibroblasts. Biosci Rep 4:121–127Google Scholar
  9. Farr AG, Nakane PK (1981) Immunohistochemistry with enzyme labelled antibodies. J Immunol Methods 47:129–144Google Scholar
  10. Goll DE, Otsuka Y, Nagainis PA, Shannon JD, Sathe SK, Muguruma M (1983) Role of muscle proteinases in maintainance of muscle integrity and mass. J Food Biochem 7:137–177Google Scholar
  11. Graham RC, Karnovsky MJ (1966) The early stages of absorption of injected horse-radish peroxidase in the proximal convoluted tubules of mouse kidney: Ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem 14:291–302Google Scholar
  12. Guth L, Samaha F (1970) Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. Exp Neurol 28:365–367Google Scholar
  13. Kar NC, Pearson CM (1980) Proteoytic mechanisms in muscular dystrophies and other neuromuscular diseases. In: Wildenthal K (ed) Degradative processes in heart and skeletal muscle. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 257–269Google Scholar
  14. Kirschke H, Langner J, Wiedernaders B, Ansgorge S, Bohley P (1977) Cathepsin L; a new proteinase from rat liver lysosomes. Eur J Biochem 74:293–301Google Scholar
  15. Kirschke H, Langner J, Riemann S, Wiederanders B, Ansgorge S, Bohley P (1980) Lysosomal cysteine proteinases. In: Protein degradation in health and disease. (pp 15–35) (Ciba Foundation Symposium 75) Excerpta Medica, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirschke H, Kembhavi AA, Bohley P, Barrett AJ (1982) Action of rat liver cathepsin L on collagen and other substrates. Biochem J 201:367–372Google Scholar
  17. Kugelberg E (1976) Adaptive transformation of rat soleus motor units during growth. J Neurol Sci 27:269–289Google Scholar
  18. Kugler P (1985) Demonstration of cathepsin B in the rat kidney using fluorescence histochemistry. Histochemistry 82:299–300Google Scholar
  19. Levy HB, Sober HA (1960) A simple chromatographic method for preparation of gamma globulin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 103:250–252Google Scholar
  20. Lowry OH, Lowry CV, Chi MMY, Hintz CS, Felder S (1980) Enzymological heterogeneity of human muscle fibres. In: Pette D (ed) Plasticity of muscle. W de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  21. Mason RW, Taylor MAJ, Etherington DJ (1984) Purification and properties of cathepsin L from rabbit liver. Biochem J 217:209–217Google Scholar
  22. McKay MJ, Marsh MW, Kirschke H, Bond JS (1984) Inactivation of fructose 1–6 biphosphate aldolase by cathepsin L stimulation by ATP. Biochim Biophys Acta 784:9–15Google Scholar
  23. Matsukura U, Okitani A, Nishimuro T, Kato H (1981) Mode of degradation of myofibrillar proteins by an endogenous protease, cathepsin L. Biochim Biophys Acta 662:41–47Google Scholar
  24. Matsukura U, Matsumoto T, Tashiro Y, Okitani A, Kato H (1984) Morphological changes in myofibrils and glycerinated muscle fibres on treatment with cathepsins D and L. Int J Biochem 16:957–962Google Scholar
  25. Millward DJ (1980) Protein degradation in skeletal and cardiac muscle during normal growth and hypertrophy. In: Wildenthal K (ed) Degradative processes in heart and skeletal muscle. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 161–199Google Scholar
  26. Nachlas MM, Tsou KC, De Sousa E, Cheng CS, Seligman AM (1957) Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrazole. J Histochem Cytochem 5:420–436Google Scholar
  27. Penny IF, Etherington DJ, Reeves JL, Taylor MAJ (1984) The action of cathepsin L and calcium activated proteinase on myofibrillar proteins. Proc Eur Meat Res Workers conference Bristol 133–135Google Scholar
  28. Peter JB, Kar NC, Barnard RJ, Pearson CM, Edgerton VR (1972) Distribution of acid hydrolases in guinea pig skeletal muscle. Biochem Med 6:257–261Google Scholar
  29. Smith RE, Van Frank RM (1975) The use of amino acid derivatives of 4 methoxy-β-napthylamine for the assay and subcellular localisation of tissue proteinases. In: Dingle JT, Dean RT (eds) Lysosomes in biology and pathology, vol 4. North Holland American Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 193–249Google Scholar
  30. Spamer C, Pette D (1980) Metabolic subpopulations of rabbit skeletal muscle fibres. In: Pette D (ed) Plasticity of muscle. W de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 19–30Google Scholar
  31. Starr R, Almond RE, Offer GO (1985) Location of C-protein, H-protein and X-protein in rabbit skeletal muscle fibre types. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 6:227–256Google Scholar
  32. Stauber WT, Ong SH (1981) Fluorescence demonstration of cathepsin B activity in skeletal cardiac and vascular smooth muscle. J Histochem Cytochem 29:866–869Google Scholar
  33. Stauber WT, Fritz V, Dahlmann B, Gauthier F, Kirschke H, Ulrich R (1985) Fluorescence methods for localizing proteinases and proteinase inhibitors in skeletal muscle. Histochem J 17:787–796Google Scholar
  34. Towatari T, Tanaka K, Yoshikawa D, Katunuma N (1978) Purification and properties of a new cathepsin from rat liver. J Biochem (Tokyo) 84:659–671Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. J. Taylor
    • 1
  • R. E. almond
    • 1
  • D. J. Etherington
    • 1
  1. 1.Muscle Biology Division, Agricultural and Food Reseach CouncilInstitute of Food Research-Bristol LaboratoryLangford, BristolUK

Personalised recommendations