Summary
Changes in the area of glutaraldehyde fixed 15 day p.c. mouse embryo limbs were recorded using a Quantimet 720 image analysing computer attached to a light microscope: during a period of treatment with an isotonic salt solution (mostly halides of the alkali or alkaline earth metals); a subsequent wash with distilled water; and dehydration through a 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100% ethanol series. Pretreatment with NaCl, KCl, RbCl had no significant effect. Treatment with LiCl, LiNO3, LiF (0.03 M), CsF and CsCl caused an increase (relative to Na, K or Rb treated samples) in the specimen volume during dehydration, which persisted in 100% ethanol. Li treated samples showed the largest post-critical-point-drying (CPD) volumes, followed by Cs treated tissue. Pretreatment with Be, Mg, Ca, Sr and Ba chlorides caused shrinkage and the 100% ethanol and post-CPD volumes of these samples were all lower than those treated with the monovalent cation containing salts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arborgh B, Bell P, Brunk U, Collins VP (1976) The Osmotic Effect of Glutaraldehyde during Fixation. A Transmission Electron Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy and Cytochemical Study. J Ultrastruct Res 56:339–350
Bahr GF, Bloom G, Friberg U (1957) Volume changes of tissues in physiological fluids during fixation in OsO4 or formaldehyde and during subsequent treatment. Exp Cell Res 12:342–355
Bone Q, Denton EJ (1971) The osmotic effects of EM fixatives. J Cell Biol 49:571–581
Boyde A, Bailey E, Jones SJ, Tamarin A (1977) Dimensional changes during specimen preparation for SEM. SEM/IITRI, Vol 1, pp 507–518
Boyde A, Maconnachie E (1979) Volume changes during preparation of mouse embryonic tissue for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning vol 2. Witzstrock Verlag Baden-Baden, pp 149–163
Boyde A, Wood C (1969) Preparation of animal tissues for surface-SEM. J Microsc 90:221–249
Eins S, Wilhelms E (1976) Assessment of preparative volume changes in central nervous tissue using automatic image analysis. Microscope 24:29–38
Gusnard D, Kirschner RH (1977) Cell and organelle shrinkage during preparation for SEM: effects of fixation, dehydration and CPD. J Microsc 110:51–57
Lytton DG, Yuen E, Rickard KA (1979) Scanning electron and light microscope correlation of individual human bone marrow cells before and after culture in nutrient agar. J. Microsc 115:35–49
Maconnachie E (1979) A study of digit fusion in the mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 49:259–276
Patten BM, Philpott R (1921) The shrinkage of embryos in the processes preparatory to sectioning. Anat Rec 20:393–413
Penttila A, Kalimo H, Trump BF (1974) Influence of glutaraldehyde and/or osmium on cell volume, ion content, mechanical stability and membrane permeability of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. J Cell Biol 63:197–214
Schneider GB (1976) The effects of preparative procedures for SEM on the size of isolated lymphocytes. Am J Anat 146:93–100
Schneider GB, Pockwinse SM, Billings-Gagliardi S (1978) Morphological changes in isolated lymphocytes during preparation for SEM: A comparative TEM/SEM study of freeze drying and critical point drying. Scanning Electron Microscopy Vol 2. SEM Inc AMF O'Hare IL 60666 USA, pp 77–84
Seki M (1937) Untersuchungen mit nichtwässerigen Flüssigkeiten. 1. Fixierung. 2. Schrumpfung. Z Zellforsch 26:305–337
Tamarin A, Boyde A (1977) Facial and Visceral arch development in the mouse embryo: a study by scanning electron microscopy. J Anat 124:563–580
Tarkhan AA (1931) The effects of fixatives and other reagents on cell-size and tissue-bulk. J R Microsc Soc 51:387–399
Tooze J (1964) Measurements of some cellular changes during the fixation of amphibian erythrocytes with osmium tetroxide solutions. J Cell Biol 22:551–562
Waterman RE (1972) Use of the SEM for observation of vertebrate embryos. Dev Biol 27:276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyde, A., Maconnachie, E. Treatment with lithium salts reduces ethanol dehydration shrinkage of glutaraldehyde fixed tissue. Histochemistry 66, 181–187 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494644
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494644