Summary
In Feulgen nuclear staining nonspecific dye-binding due to the “pseudo-plasmal reaction” is intensified in isolated cells with intact cytoplasm, and cannot be eliminated by the post-irradiation method. Fluorescence intensity in the cytoplasm sometimes exceeds that of specific nuclear fluorescence, especially in brain and heart muscle cells, and it was almost impossible to perform cytofluorometric DNA quantification on such specimens. Various kinds of aldehyde-blocking agents such as sodium borohydride, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, aniline, and sodium pyrosulfite were effective in reducing the “pseudo-plasmal reaction”. But the blocking effects were not complete because of additional release of reactive aldehyde groups during subsequent Feulgen hydrolysis. Acidic azocarmin G produces a complete block of all “pseudo-plasmal reaction” in acriflavine-Feulgen nuclear staining, allowing accurate DNA-cytofluorometry to be carried out.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Böhm N, Sprenger E (1968) Fluorescence cytofluorometry: A valuable method for the quantitative determination of nuclear Feulgen-DNA. Histochemie 16:100–118
Böhm N (1972) Fluorescence cytophotometric determination of DNA. In: Glick D, Rosenbaum RM (eds). Techniques of biochemical and biophysical morphology, vol 1. New York London, Wiley, pp 90–141
Feulgen R, Rossenbeck H (1924) Mikroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis einer Nucleinsäure vom Typus der Thymonucleinsäure und die darauf beruhende elektive Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift Physiol Chemie 135:203–248
Feulgen R, Voit K (1924) Über einen weitverbreiteten festen Aldehyd, seine Entstehung aus einer Vorstufe, sein mikrochemischer und makroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis und die Wege zu seiner präparativen Darstellung. Pflügers Arch ges Physiol 206:389–410
Fujita S (1973) DNA cytofluorometry on large and small nuclei stained with pararosaniline Feulgen. Histochemie 36:139–199
Fujita S, Fukuda M (1974) Irradiation of specimens by excitation light before and after staining with pararosaniline Feulgen: A new method to reduce non-specific fluorescence in cytofluorometry. Histochemistry 40:59–67
Fukuda M, Nakanishi K, Mukainaka T, Shima A, Fujita S (1976) Combination of Feulgen nuclear reaction with immunofluorescent staining for photoproducts of DNA after UV-irradiation. Acta Histochem Cytochem 9:180–192
Fukuda M, Nakanishi K, Sawamura I, Fujita S (1977) Standardization of the post-irradiation method to eliminate primary fluorescence in cytofluorometry. Histochemistry 52:119–127
Fukuda M, Böhm N, Fujita S (1978) Cytophotometry and its biological application. In: Progress in histochemistry and cytochemistry, vol 11, No 2 Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York:
Graumann W (1953) Zur Standardisierung des Schiffschen Reagens. Z Wiss Mikr 61:225–226
Hayes ER (1949) A rigorous re-definition of the plasmal reaction. Stain Technol 24:19–23
Hirose S, Yasutomi M, Murai N, Iwasa Z, Hirose M, Shindo K, Razzaq AKA, Aso R, Kikkawa N (1972) Cell isolation from fixed tissue for microspectrophotometry of nuclear DNA content, and its application to the epithelial disorders of the alimentary tract. In: Takeuchi T, Ogawa K, Fujita S (eds) Histochem cytochem vol 1. JSHC, Kyoto, p 209
van Ingen EM, Tanke HJ, Ploem JS (1979) Model studies on the acriflavine-Feulgen reaction. J Histochem Cytochem 27:80–83
Itikawa O, Ogura I (1954) The Feulgen reaction after hydrolysis at room temperature. Stain Technol 29:13–15
Lison L (1953) Histochimie et Cytochimie animales. Principes et Méthodes. 2e édition, Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Lison L (1960) Histochimie et Cytochimie animales. Principes et Méthodes. 3e édition, Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Ruthmann A (1970) Methods in cell research. Cornell University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takamatsu, T., Nakanishi, K., Onouchi, Z. et al. Nonspecific (“pseudo-plasmal”) dye-binding in the Feulgen nuclear stain and its blocking by azocarmin G. Histochemistry 66, 169–180 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494643
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00494643