Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of crop residues in soil on phymatotrichum root rot of cotton

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of cropping pea or barley and the decomposition of their residues on Phymatotrichum root rot of cotton were studied for five years. Little or no changes occurred in pH, content of carbon or moisture in the soil, but there were significant increases in populations of competitive microflora. Best control was obtained in infested soil which was cropped to either pea or barley in winter or in soil which received the higher tonnage of Papago pea plants. Reduction in incidence of root rot may be attributed to premature germination of overwintering propagules making hyphae vulnerable to the chemicals of decomposition and to competition of microflora in the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hervey, R.J. 1961. Effect of differing carbon-nitrogen residues on actinomycetes and microbial antagonists in Texas Blackland soils. Bacteriol. Proc. 61: 55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. King, C.J. 1937. A method for the control of cotton root rot in the irrigated southwest. USDA Circ. 425. 9 p.

  3. King, C.J., D. Hope & E.D. Eaton. 1934. Some microbiological activities affected in manurial control of cotton root rot. J. Agr. Res. 49: 1093–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. King, C.J. & H.F. Loomis. 1926. Experiments on the control of cotton root rot in Arizona. J. Agr. Res. 32: 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  5. King, C.J. & H.F. Loomis. 1929. Cotton Root Rot Investigations in Arizona. J. Agr. Res. 39: 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pammel, L.H. 1888. Root Rot of Cotton, or ’Cotton Blight’. Texas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 4: 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pammel, L.H. 1889. Cotton Root Rot. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 7: 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers, C.H. 1942. Cotton root rot studies with special reference to sclerotia, cover crops, rotations, tillage, seedling rates, soil fungicides and effects on seed quality. Texas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 614. 45 p.

  9. Scofield, C.S. 1921. Cotton Root Rot in the San Antonio Rotations. J. Agr. Res. 21: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Streets, R.B. 1938. Control of Phymatotrichum (Cotton or Texas) Root Rot in Arizona. Univ. of Ariz. Agr. Ext. Circ. 103. 80 p.

  11. Streets, R.B. 1956. Control of Phymatotrichum Root Rot in irrigated lands. Univ. of Ariz. Exp. Sta. Progress Report 161: 86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taubenhaus, J.J. & W.N. Ezekiel. 1931. Cotton root rot and its control. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 423. 39 p.

  13. Toussoun, T.A., A.R. Weinhold, R.G. Linderman & Z.A. Patrick. 1968. Nature of phytotoxic substances produced during plant residue decomposition in soil. Phytopathology 58: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walkley, A. 1947. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils. Soil Science 63: 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Warcup, J.H. 1950. The soil-plate method for isolation of fungi from soil. Nature 166: 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Former Graduate Assistant in Research, Associate Professor, Professor, and Former Professor of Plant Pathology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chavez, H.B., Bloss, H.E., Boyle, A.M. et al. Effects of crop residues in soil on phymatotrichum root rot of cotton. Mycopathologia 58, 1–7 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493585

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00493585

Keywords

Navigation