Synthese

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 201–232 | Cite as

Complementarity in quantum mechanics: A logical analysis

  • Hugo Bedau
  • Paul Oppenheim
Articles

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Logical Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, Peter, ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXV # 258 (April 1956) pp. 145–165.Google Scholar
  2. Bernays, Paul. ‘Über die Ausdehnung des Begriffes der Komplementarität auf die Philosophie,’ Synthèse VII # 1–2 (1948–1949) pp. 66–70.Google Scholar
  3. Bohm, David. ‘A Proposed Explanation of Quantum Theory in Terms of Hidden Variables at a Sub-quantum-mechanical Level,’ pp. 33–40 in Körner, Stephen (ed.), Observation and Interpretation New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1957.Google Scholar
  4. Bohr, Niels [1]. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  5. Bohr, Niels [2]. ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ Physical Review XLVIII (Oct. 15, 1935) pp. 696–702.Google Scholar
  6. Bohr, Niels [3]. ‘Causality and Complementarity,’ Philosophy of Science IV # 3 (July 1937) pp. 289–298.Google Scholar
  7. Bohr, Niels [4]. ‘The Causality Problem in Atomic Physics,’ pp. 11–30 in New Theories in Physics Paris: International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation, 1939.Google Scholar
  8. Bohr, Niels [5]. ‘On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948), pp. 312–319.Google Scholar
  9. Bohr, Niels [6]. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. Bohr, Niels [7]. ‘Quantum Physics and Philosophy,’ pp. 308–314 in Klibanski, Raymond (ed.), Philosophy in Mid-Century, Vol. I, Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Born, Max [1]. The Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  12. Born, Max [2]. The Restless Universe New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
  13. Bunge, Mario. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ British Journal of Philosophy of Science VI # 21–22 (May–August 1955) pp. 1–12, 141–154.Google Scholar
  14. Carnap, Rudolf [1]. ‘Testability and Meaning,’ Philosophy of Science III # 4 (Oct. 1936) pp. 419–471.Google Scholar
  15. Carnap, Rudolf [2]. Introduction to Symbolic Logic New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1958.Google Scholar
  16. De Broglie, Louis [1]. Matter and Light New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1939.Google Scholar
  17. De Broglie, Louis [2]. The Revolution in Physics New York: The Noonday Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. Destouches-Février, P. ‘Manifestations et sens de la notion de complémentarité,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948) pp. 383–412.Google Scholar
  19. Dirac, P. A. M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  20. Feyerabend, P. K. [1]. ‘An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LVIII (1957–1958) pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
  21. Feyerabend, P. K. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
  22. Feyerabend, P. K. [3]. ‘Reichenbach's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,’ Philosophical Studies IX # 4 (June 1958) pp. 49–59.Google Scholar
  23. Frank, Philipp [1]. Modern Science and Its Philosophy Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, Philipp [2]. Philosophy of Science Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1957.Google Scholar
  25. Gamow, George. ‘The Principle of Uncertainty,’ Scientific American CXCVIII # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  26. Grünbaum, Adolf. ‘Complementarity in Quantum Physics and Its Philosophical Generalizations,’ The Journal of Philosophy LIV # 23 (Nov. 7, 1957).Google Scholar
  27. Hempel, Carl G. [1]. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  28. Hempel, Carl G. [2] Journal of Symbolic Logic, 10, # 3, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar
  29. Hanson, Norwood Russell [1]. Patterns of Discovery Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  30. Hanson, Norwood Russell [2]. ‘Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory,’ American Journal of Physics XXVII # 1 (Jan. 1959) pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  31. Hanson, Norwood Russell [3]. ‘Five Conditions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics,’ Philosophy of Science XXVI # 4 (Oct. 1959) pp. 325–337.Google Scholar
  32. Heisenberg, Werner [1]. Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science London: Faber and Faber, Ltd., 1952.Google Scholar
  33. Heisenberg, Werner [2]. ‘The Development of the Interpretation of the Quantum Theory,’ pp. 12–29 in Pauli, W. (ed.), Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1955.Google Scholar
  34. Heisenberg, Werner [3]. The Physicist's Conception of Nature London: Hutchinson and Co., 1958.Google Scholar
  35. Heisenberg, Werner [4]. Physics and Philosophy New York: Harper and Bros., 1958.Google Scholar
  36. Heisenberg, Werner [5]. ‘The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics,’ in May, Rollo (ed.), Symbolism in Religion and Literature New York: George Braziller, 1960.Google Scholar
  37. Hutten, Ernest H. The Language of Modern Physics London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956.Google Scholar
  38. MacKay, D. M. [1]. ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXVI # 263 (July 1957) pp. 390–394.Google Scholar
  39. MacKay, D. M. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 105–122.Google Scholar
  40. Margenau, Henry [1]. The Nature of Physical Reality New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1950.Google Scholar
  41. Margenau, Henry [2]. ‘Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics,’ Philosophy of Science XXV # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
  42. Nagel, Ernest [1]. ‘The Causal Character of Modern Physical Theory,’ pp. 419–437 reprinted in Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1953.Google Scholar
  43. Nagel, Ernest [2]. Review of Reichenbach's Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophy XLII, # 16, (Aug. 2, 1945) pp. 437–444.Google Scholar
  44. Noyes, H. Pierre. ‘The Physical Description of Elementary Particles,’ American Scientist XLV # 4 (Dec. 1957) pp. 431–448.Google Scholar
  45. Pauli, Wolfgang. ‘Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität,’ Experentia VI # 2 (1950) pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery London: Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., 1959.Google Scholar
  47. Reichenbach, Hans. Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1944.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenfeld, L. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ Science Progress XLI # 163 (July 1953) pp. 393–410.Google Scholar
  49. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist Evanston: Library of Living Philosophers, 1949.Google Scholar
  50. Schrödinger, Erwin. ‘What is Matter?’ Scientific American CXXCIX # 3 (Sept. 1953) pp. 52–57.Google Scholar
  51. Weizsäcker, C. F. von. ‘Komplementarität und Logic,’ Die Naturwissenschaften XLII # 19–20 (1955) pp. 521–529, 545–555.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Bedau
  • Paul Oppenheim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations