, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 201–232 | Cite as

Complementarity in quantum mechanics: A logical analysis

  • Hugo Bedau
  • Paul Oppenheim


Quantum Mechanic Logical Analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, Peter, ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXV # 258 (April 1956) pp. 145–165.Google Scholar
  2. Bernays, Paul. ‘Über die Ausdehnung des Begriffes der Komplementarität auf die Philosophie,’ Synthèse VII # 1–2 (1948–1949) pp. 66–70.Google Scholar
  3. Bohm, David. ‘A Proposed Explanation of Quantum Theory in Terms of Hidden Variables at a Sub-quantum-mechanical Level,’ pp. 33–40 in Körner, Stephen (ed.), Observation and Interpretation New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1957.Google Scholar
  4. Bohr, Niels [1]. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  5. Bohr, Niels [2]. ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ Physical Review XLVIII (Oct. 15, 1935) pp. 696–702.Google Scholar
  6. Bohr, Niels [3]. ‘Causality and Complementarity,’ Philosophy of Science IV # 3 (July 1937) pp. 289–298.Google Scholar
  7. Bohr, Niels [4]. ‘The Causality Problem in Atomic Physics,’ pp. 11–30 in New Theories in Physics Paris: International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation, 1939.Google Scholar
  8. Bohr, Niels [5]. ‘On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948), pp. 312–319.Google Scholar
  9. Bohr, Niels [6]. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. Bohr, Niels [7]. ‘Quantum Physics and Philosophy,’ pp. 308–314 in Klibanski, Raymond (ed.), Philosophy in Mid-Century, Vol. I, Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Born, Max [1]. The Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  12. Born, Max [2]. The Restless Universe New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
  13. Bunge, Mario. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ British Journal of Philosophy of Science VI # 21–22 (May–August 1955) pp. 1–12, 141–154.Google Scholar
  14. Carnap, Rudolf [1]. ‘Testability and Meaning,’ Philosophy of Science III # 4 (Oct. 1936) pp. 419–471.Google Scholar
  15. Carnap, Rudolf [2]. Introduction to Symbolic Logic New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1958.Google Scholar
  16. De Broglie, Louis [1]. Matter and Light New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1939.Google Scholar
  17. De Broglie, Louis [2]. The Revolution in Physics New York: The Noonday Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. Destouches-Février, P. ‘Manifestations et sens de la notion de complémentarité,’ Dialectica # 7/8 (1948) pp. 383–412.Google Scholar
  19. Dirac, P. A. M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  20. Feyerabend, P. K. [1]. ‘An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LVIII (1957–1958) pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
  21. Feyerabend, P. K. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
  22. Feyerabend, P. K. [3]. ‘Reichenbach's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,’ Philosophical Studies IX # 4 (June 1958) pp. 49–59.Google Scholar
  23. Frank, Philipp [1]. Modern Science and Its Philosophy Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  24. Frank, Philipp [2]. Philosophy of Science Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1957.Google Scholar
  25. Gamow, George. ‘The Principle of Uncertainty,’ Scientific American CXCVIII # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  26. Grünbaum, Adolf. ‘Complementarity in Quantum Physics and Its Philosophical Generalizations,’ The Journal of Philosophy LIV # 23 (Nov. 7, 1957).Google Scholar
  27. Hempel, Carl G. [1]. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  28. Hempel, Carl G. [2] Journal of Symbolic Logic, 10, # 3, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar
  29. Hanson, Norwood Russell [1]. Patterns of Discovery Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  30. Hanson, Norwood Russell [2]. ‘Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory,’ American Journal of Physics XXVII # 1 (Jan. 1959) pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  31. Hanson, Norwood Russell [3]. ‘Five Conditions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics,’ Philosophy of Science XXVI # 4 (Oct. 1959) pp. 325–337.Google Scholar
  32. Heisenberg, Werner [1]. Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science London: Faber and Faber, Ltd., 1952.Google Scholar
  33. Heisenberg, Werner [2]. ‘The Development of the Interpretation of the Quantum Theory,’ pp. 12–29 in Pauli, W. (ed.), Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1955.Google Scholar
  34. Heisenberg, Werner [3]. The Physicist's Conception of Nature London: Hutchinson and Co., 1958.Google Scholar
  35. Heisenberg, Werner [4]. Physics and Philosophy New York: Harper and Bros., 1958.Google Scholar
  36. Heisenberg, Werner [5]. ‘The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics,’ in May, Rollo (ed.), Symbolism in Religion and Literature New York: George Braziller, 1960.Google Scholar
  37. Hutten, Ernest H. The Language of Modern Physics London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956.Google Scholar
  38. MacKay, D. M. [1]. ‘Complementary Descriptions,’ Mind LXVI # 263 (July 1957) pp. 390–394.Google Scholar
  39. MacKay, D. M. [2]. ‘Complementarity,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume XXXII (July 1958) pp. 105–122.Google Scholar
  40. Margenau, Henry [1]. The Nature of Physical Reality New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1950.Google Scholar
  41. Margenau, Henry [2]. ‘Philosophical Problems Concerning the Meaning of Measurement in Physics,’ Philosophy of Science XXV # 1 (Jan. 1958) pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
  42. Nagel, Ernest [1]. ‘The Causal Character of Modern Physical Theory,’ pp. 419–437 reprinted in Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1953.Google Scholar
  43. Nagel, Ernest [2]. Review of Reichenbach's Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophy XLII, # 16, (Aug. 2, 1945) pp. 437–444.Google Scholar
  44. Noyes, H. Pierre. ‘The Physical Description of Elementary Particles,’ American Scientist XLV # 4 (Dec. 1957) pp. 431–448.Google Scholar
  45. Pauli, Wolfgang. ‘Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität,’ Experentia VI # 2 (1950) pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery London: Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., 1959.Google Scholar
  47. Reichenbach, Hans. Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1944.Google Scholar
  48. Rosenfeld, L. ‘Strife About Complementarity,’ Science Progress XLI # 163 (July 1953) pp. 393–410.Google Scholar
  49. Schilpp, P. A. (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist Evanston: Library of Living Philosophers, 1949.Google Scholar
  50. Schrödinger, Erwin. ‘What is Matter?’ Scientific American CXXCIX # 3 (Sept. 1953) pp. 52–57.Google Scholar
  51. Weizsäcker, C. F. von. ‘Komplementarität und Logic,’ Die Naturwissenschaften XLII # 19–20 (1955) pp. 521–529, 545–555.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Bedau
  • Paul Oppenheim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations