Abstract
In this paper we attempt to show how the goal of resolving moral problems in a patient's care can best be achieved by working at the bedside.
We present and discuss three cases to illustrate the art and science of clinical ethics consultation. The sine qua non of the clinical ethics consultant is that he or she goes to the patient's bedside to obtain specific clinical and ethical information. Unlike ethics committees, which often depend on secondhand information from a physician or nurse, clinical ethics consultants personally speak with and examine patients and review their laboratory data and medical records. The skills of the clinical ethics consultant include the ability to delineate and resolve ethical problems in a particular patient's case and to teach other health professionals to build their own frameworks for clinical ethical decision making. When the clinical situation requires it, clinical ethics consultants can and should assist primary physicians with case management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lo B. Behind closed doors: promises and pitfalls of ethics committees. N Engl J Med 1987;317:46–50.
Schiedermayer DL, La Puma J, Miles SH. Ethics consultations masking economic dilemmas in patient care. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1303–5.
Purtilo RB. Ethics consultations in the hospital. N Engl J Med 1984;311:983–6.
Jonsen AR. Can an ethicist be a consultant? In: Abernathy V, ed. Frontiers in Medical Ethics: Applications in a Medical Setting. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 1980:157–71.
Singer PA, Pellegrino ED, Siegler M. Ethics committees and consultants. J Clin Ethics 1991;1(4):263–7.
Glover JJ, Ozar DT, Thomasma DC. Teaching ethics on rounds: ethicist as teacher, consultant, and decision-maker. Theor Med 1986;7:13–32.
Perkins HS, Saathoff BS. Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: an exploratory study. Am J Med 1988;85:761–5.
La Puma J, Stocking CB, Silverstein MD, DiMartini A, Siegler M. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital: utilization and evaluation. JAMA 1988;260:808–11.
La Puma J. Consultations in clinical ethics — issues and questions in 27 cases. West J Med 1987;146:633–7.
Boyer T. Hepatorenal syndrome. In: Wyngaarden JB, Smith LH, eds. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1988:847–52.
Henderson LJ. Physician and patient as a social system. N Engl J Med 1935;212:819–23.
Siegler M. Clinical ethics and clinical medicine. Arch Intern Med 1979;139:914–5.
La Puma J, Toulmin S. Ethics consultants and ethics committees. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1109–12.
Pellegrino ED. Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: the primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness. J Med Philos 1979;4:32–56.
Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
Tumulty PA. What is a clinician and what does he do? N Engl J Med 1970;283:20–4.
Youngner SJ. Who defines futility? JAMA 1988;260:2094–5.
La Puma J, Stocking CB, Silverstein MD, DiMartini A, Siegler M. A prospective evaluation of an ethics consultation service. Clin Res 1987;35(2):748A.
Rudd P. Problems in consultation medicine: the generalist's reply. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3(6):592–5.
Siegler M. A legacy of Osler: teaching clinical ethics at the bedside. JAMA 1978;239:951–6.
Quill T. Recognizing and adjusting to barriers in doctor-patient communication. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:51–7.
Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:520–8.
Wu WC, Pearlman RA. Consent in medical decision-making: the role of communication. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3:9–14.
La Puma J, Schiedermayer DL. Ethics consultation: skills, roles and training. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:155–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the supporting institutions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
la Puma, J., Schiedermayer, D.L. The clinical ethicist at the bedside. Theor Med Bioeth 12, 141–149 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489794
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489794