Theoretical Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 33–44 | Cite as

Should a criminal receive a heart transplant? Medical Justice vs. Societal Justice

  • Lawrence J. Schneiderman
  • Nancy S. Jecker
Article

Abstract

Should the nation provide expensive care and scarce organs to convicted felons? We distinguish between two fields of justice: Medical Justice and Societal Justice. Although there is general acceptance within the medical profession that physicians may distribute limited treatments based solely on potential medical benefits without regard to nonmedical factors, that does not mean that society cannot impose limits based on societal factors. If a society considers the convicted felon to be a full member, then that person would be entitled to at least a “decent minimum” level of care — which might include access to scarce life-saving organs. However, if criminals forfeit their entitlement to the same level of medical care afforded to all members of society, they still would be entitled to a kind of “rudimentary decent minimum” granted to all persons on simple humanitarian grounds. Almost certainly this entitlement would not include access to organ transplants.

Key words

allocation of scarce resources candidate selection convicted criminals justice organ transplants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kolata G. U.S. refuses to finance prison heart transplant. The New York Times February 5, 1994, 6Y.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zinsser H. As 1 Remember Him: The Biography of R.S. Boston: Little Brown, 1940, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morreim H. Cost containment: challenging fidelity and justice. Hastings Cent Rep 1988;18(6):20–25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morreim: 23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morreim H. Fiscal scarcity and the inevitability of bedside budget balancing. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1012–1015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell JM, Sunshine JH. Consequences of physicians' ownership of health care facilities — joint ventures in radiation therapy. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1497–1501; Swedlow A, Johnson G, Smithline N, Milstein A. Increased costs and rates of use in the California workers' compensation system as a result of self-referral by physicians. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1502–1506; Relman A. “Self-referral” — What's at stake. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1522–1524.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bostos PG, et al. The APACHE III Prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991;100:1619–1636; Pollack MM, Ruttmann UE, Getson PR. Accurate prediction of the outcome of pediatric intensive care. N Engl J Med 1987;316:134–139.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan RM. Quality of life assessment. In: Karoly P, ed. Measurement Strategies in Health Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1985:115–146.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Emery D, Schneiderman LJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Hastings Cent Rep 1989;19(4):8–13.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kellermann AL, Staves DR, Heckman BB. In-hospital resuscitation following unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support: “heroic efforts” or an exercise in futility? Ann Emer Med 1988;17(6):589–594; Lantos JD, Miles SH, Silverstein MD, Stocking CB. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight: is CPR futile? N Engl J Med 1988;318:91–95; Faber-Langendoen K. Resuscitation of patients with metastatic cancer: is transient benefit still futile? Arch Intern Med 1991;151:235–239; Gray WA, Capone RJ, Most AS. Unsuccessful emergency medical resuscitation — are continued efforts in the emergency department justified? N Engl M Med 1991;329:1393–1398.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murphy DJ, Murray AM, Robinson BE, et al. Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:199–205.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flavin DK, Niven RG, Kelsey JE. Alcoholism and orthotopic liver transplantation. JAMA 1988;259:1546–1547.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liver Transplantation, CONSENSUS CONFERENCE. JAMA 1983;250:2961–2964; Lucey MR. Liver transplantation for the alcoholic patient. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 1993;22(2):243–256; Kumar S, Stauber RE, Gavaler JS, Basista MH, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 1990;11(2):159–164; Cotton P. Alcohol's threat to liver transplant recipients may be overstated, suggests retrospective study. JAMA 1994;271:1815.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miles SH. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, 1983 NY, p. 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alexander S. They decide who lives, who dies. Life Magazine 11/9/62:102–125.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beauchamp TL. Childress JF: 212.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rawls J. Principles of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beauchamp TL. Childress JF: 203.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beauchamp TL. Childress JF: 195.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plato. In: Grube GM, transl. Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1974.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ramsey P. The Patient as Person. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Beauchamp TL. Childress JF: 213.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence J. Schneiderman
    • 1
  • Nancy S. Jecker
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Family and Preventive Medicine and MedicineUniversity of California, San Diego, School of MedicineLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical History and EthicsUniversity of Washington, School of MedicineSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations