Skip to main content
Log in

Death

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a classic problem which confronts any attempt to assign death a value. On the assumption that death is personal annihilation, death deprives evil of a requisite subject, for no misfortune can befall something which does not exist. Recent efforts to provide a reasonable basis for counting death as a bad thing have centered on an analysis of the loss of life's goods which it brings. So long as the analysis assumes that death is a simple state, loss can be explained only by reference to a realm of possible things which exist after death. An alternative analysis of death is offered in which death is defined as a limit on life. That analysis provides a basis for evaluative judgements about death, while avoiding any commitment to post-mortem existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Donnelly, J. (ed.): 1978, Language, Metaphysics and Death, Fordham University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epicurus: 1977, Letter to Menoeceus, in J. M. Cahn (ed.), Classics in Western Philosophy, Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis, pp. 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1971, ‘Death’, in Moral Problems, edited by J. Rachels, Harper and Row, Reprinted in (Donnelly 1978), pp. 62–69.

  • Plato: 1980, ‘Republic’, in The Republic and other Works, translated by B. Jowett, Anchor Books, Garden City, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, M.I.T. Press and Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, H.: 1980, ‘The evil of death’, The Journal of Philosophy LXVII, pp. 401/423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. W.: 1976, ‘A matter of life and death’, Nous 10, 145–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evra, J.: 1971, ‘On death as a limit’, Analysis 31, 170–176. Reprinted in (Donnelly 1978), pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N., 1979, On Defining Death, McGill-Queen's Univ. Press, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1973, ‘The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality’, in B. Williams, Problems of the Self, Cambridge Univ. Press. Reprinted in (Donnelly 1978), pp. 228–242.

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: 1976, ‘Can death be understood?’ in J. King-Farlow and William R. Shea (eds.), Values and the Quality of Life, Science History Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The core idea of death as a limit was first presented in Van Evra (1971). A somewhat more refined version was presented at the Halifax meeting of the Canadian Philosophical Association in May, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Evra, J.W. Death. Theor Med Bioeth 5, 197–207 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489491

Key words

Navigation