Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Presumed consent for organ retrieval

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

There remains a tremendous shortage of organs for transplantation, and many patients have prolonged waiting periods before receiving a transplant. This occurs in spite of data showing that (1) the general public supports transplantation and organ donation, and (2) a much larger number of donors is potentially available. Current legislation creates an environment that is awkward and often hostile to organ donation. As a result, many physicians do not refer potential donors and many families refuse consent. Presumed consent legislation would create a more favorable environment and has the potential of markedly increasing the number of potential donors whose organs could be used. Arguments against changing the law to ‘presumed consent’ have emphasized that other remedies would increase the number of donors. However, these remedies have been in effect for almost two decades without a marked increase in organ donation. We recommend reconsideration of legislative changes to enable ‘presumed consent’ to be in force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Couch, N. P.: ‘Supply and demand in kidney and liver transplantation: A statistical Survey’, Transplantation 4, (1966) 587–595.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crosby, D. L., West, R. R., and Davies, H.: ‘Availability of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation’, Br. Med. J. 1971/4, 401–402.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roloff, J. A., Marshall, J. P., and Reynolds, J. O., Jr.: ‘Kidney transplant donors: Estimate of availability by autopsy survey’, Arch. Surg. 103, (1971) 359–362.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, P. S., Failla, J. P., Kaufmann, H. M., et al.: ‘The cadaver donor: Logistics of supply and demand in an urban population’, JAMA 222, (1972) 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedberg, M., Larsen, N. A., and Larsen S.: ‘Potential sources of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation in a general hospital’, Acta. Med. Sowell 192, (1972) 251–253.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, H. H., Huchton, J. D., McBride, M., Beardsley, C. A., and Kahan, B.: ‘Kidney donation: Needs and possibilities’, Neurosurgery 5, (1979) 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bart, K. J., Macon, E. J., Whittier, F. C., Baldwin, R. J., and Blount, J. H.: ‘Cadaveric kidneys for transplantation: A paradox of shortage in the face of plenty’, Transplantation 31, (1981) 379–382.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sadler, A. M., Sadler, B. L., Stason, B., and Stickel, D. L.: ‘Transplantation — A case for consent’, N. Engl. J. Med. 280, (1969) 862–867.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart, F. P., Veith, F. J., and Cranford, R. E.: ‘Brain death laws and patterns of consent to remove organs for transplantation from cadavers in the United States and 28 other countries’, Transplantation 31, (1981) 238–244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sells, R. A.: ‘Live organs from dead people’, J. Royal Soc. Med. 72, (1979) 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osborne, D. J. and Gruneberg, M. M.: ‘Kidney donation — Where some of the problems lie’, Injury 11, (1979) 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkins, A. McL.: ‘Causes of failure to harvest cadaver kidneys for transplantation’, Br. Med J. 1976/1, 816–817.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee, S. N., Payne, J. E., and Berne, J. V.: ‘Difficulties in obtaining kidneys from potential postmortem donors’, JAMA 232, (1975) 822–824.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallop, G.: ‘Crucial question answered: Eighty million Americans are willing to donate vital organs to science’, The Gallop Report, Princeton, New Jersey, American Institute for Public Opinion, January 17, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moores, B., Clarke, G., Lewis, B. R., and Mallik, N. P.: ‘Public attitudes toward kidney transplantation, Br. Med. J. 1976/1, 629–631.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Public Opinion and Attitudes about Medical Transplantation among Los Angeles County Residents, Los Angeles, Transplantation Council of Southern California, 1975.

  17. Assessment of Public and Professional Attitudes Regarding Organ Donation, St. Louis, Kidney Foundation of Eastern Missouri and Metro East, Inc., 1975.

  18. Cleveland, S. E.: ‘Changes in human tissue donor attitudes: 1969–1974’, Phychosom. Med. 37, (1975) 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ward (personal communication), quoted in [10].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simmons, R. G., Bruce, J., Bienvenue, R., and Fulton, J.: ‘Who signs an organ donor card: Traditionalism versus transplantation’, J. Chron. Dis. 27, (1974) 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson, K. E.: ‘Attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation at an urban university’, Dialysis and Transplantation 11, (1982) 1058–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Etheredge, E. E., Maeser, M. N., Sicard, G. A., and Anderson, D. B. A.: ‘Natural resource: Prevalence of cadaver organs for transplantation and research’, JAMA 241, (1979) 2287–2289.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morton, J. B. and Leonard, D. R. A.: ‘Cadaver nephrectomy: An operation on the donor's family’, Br. Med. J. 1979/1, 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fulton, J., Fulton, R., and Simmons, R.: ‘The cadaver donor and the gift of life’, in Simmons, R., Klein, S. D., and Simmons, R. L. (eds.), Gift of Life: The Social and Psychological Impact of Organ Transplantation. Pp. 338–376.

  25. ‘Transplantation: The relatives' view’, J. Med. Ethics 71, 1975.

  26. Dukeminier, J. and Sanders, D.: ‘Organ transplantation: A proposal for routine salvaging of cadaver organs’, N. Engl. J. Med. 279, (1968) 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mollaret, P. and Goulon, M.: ‘Le coma depassé: Memoire preliminaire’, Rev. Neurol. 101, (1959) 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beecher, H. K.: ‘A definition of Irreversible coma’, Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death, JAMA 205, (1968) 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  29. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Defining Death, Library of Congress Card number 81–600150.

  30. Sherman, J. F. and Whedon, G. D.: ‘Salvage of cadaver organs’, N. Engl. J. Med. 279, (1969) 117.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bart, K. J., Macon, E. J., Humphries, A. L. et al.: ‘Increasing the supply of cadaveric kidneys for transplantation’, Transplantation 31, (1981) 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kennedy, I.: ‘Kidney transplants: A reply to Sells’, J. Med. Ethics 6, (1980) 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Plato: ‘The republic’, in Warmington, E. H. and Rouse, P. G. (eds.), Great Dialogues of Plato, Mentor, N.Y., 1956.

  34. Sells, R. L.: ‘Let's not opt out: Kidney donation and transplantation’, J. Med. Ethics 5, (1979) 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mahoney, J.: ‘Ethical aspects of donor consent in transplantation’, J. Med. Ethics 1, (1975) 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, 10467, Bronx, New York, U.S.A.

    Arthur J. Matas & Frank J. Veith

Authors
  1. Arthur J. Matas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank J. Veith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matas, A.J., Veith, F.J. Presumed consent for organ retrieval. Theor Med Bioeth 5, 155–166 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489488

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489488

Keywords

Search

Navigation