Abstract
The ethicist's role in the clinical context is not presently well defined. Ethicists can be thought of as moralists, technicians, Sophists, or as teachers and learners. Each of these roles is examined in turn. An argument is made for the ethicist as a teacher who must also learn a great deal about the clinical setting in order to encourage an effective critical examination of basic values. Four specific tasks of this teaching role are discussed: describing moral experience, eliciting assumptions, considering multiple alternatives and justifying choices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaine, G.: 1985, Correspondence, ‘Ethicists in the hospital’, New England Journal of Medicine 312, 188.
Clouser, K.: 1972, ‘Philosophy and medicine: The clinical management of mixed marriage’, in Proceedings, First Session, Institute on Human Values in Medicine, Society for Health and Human Values, Philadelphia, pp. 47–80.
de Chadarevian, J.-P.: 1985, Correspondence, ‘Ethicists in the hospital’, New England Journal of Medicine 312, 188–89.
Pellegrino, E.: 1972, ‘Reflections, refractions and prospectives’, in Proceedings, First Session, Institute on Human Values in Medicine, Society for Health and Human Values, Philadelphia, pp. 99–115.
Purtilo, R.: 1984, ‘Ethics consultations in the hospital’, New England Journal of Medicine 311, 983–86.
Russell, B.: 1945, A History of Western Philosophy, Random House, New York, pp. 77–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Churchill, L.R., Cross, A.W. Moralist, technician, sophist, teacher/learner: Reflections on the ethicist in the clinical setting. Theor Med Bioeth 7, 3–12 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489418
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489418