Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Autonomy in the doctor-patient relation

  • David C. Thomasma
Article

Abstract

As an introduction to this issue, I argue that the concept of autonomy is clearly important for many of the freedoms we enjoy. The problem in medicine with its use lies in interpreting the concept with respect to the impact of disease on persons, the models of medicine we employ, and the settings in which the problems arise. A short statement about the major points of the authors collected in this issue concludes the editorial.

Key words

Philosophy of medicine Autonomy Medical ethics Doctor-patient relation Hermeneutics Metaphysics of persons Health care setting Models of medicine Disease Self-determination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Veatch, R.: 1982, A Theory of Medical Ethics, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Pellegrino, E. and Thomasma, D.: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ramsey, P.: 1980, Ethics at the Edges of Life, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 156.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Veatch, R.: 1976, Death, Dying and the Biological Revolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 146.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bergsma, J. and Thomasma, D.: 1982, Health Care: Its Psychosocial Dimensions, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cassell, E.: ‘Disease as an “it”’, Social Science and Medicine.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dworkin, G.: 1976, ‘Autonomy and behavior control’, Hastings Center Report 6, 23–28.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wolff, R.: 1970, In Defense of Anarchism, Harper and Row, New York, p. 14.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kant, I.: 1961, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Hutchinson University Library, London, p. 98.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Zaner, R.: 1981, The Context of Self, Ohio University Press, Athens.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    MacIntyre, A.: 1982, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 6–21.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Annas, G.: 1974, ‘The hospital: A Human rights wasteland’, The Civil Liberties Review 1, 9–29.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Clark, B.: ‘Whose Life Is It Anyway?’, A 1981 motion picture starring Richard Dreyfuss.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Veatch, R.: 1979, ‘Professional medical ethics: The grounding of its principles’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bradley, P.: 1980, ‘A response to the March 1979 issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 213–214.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Cassell, E.: 1981, ‘The function of medicine’, Hastings Center Report 7, 22–28.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Siegler, M.: 1977, ‘Critical illness: The limits of autonomy’, Hastings Center Report 7, 12–15.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Miller, B.: 1981, ‘Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment’, Hastings Center Report 11, 22–28.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1978, ‘Commentary: Moral autonomy and the polis: Response to Gerald Dworkin and Gregory Vlastos’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. and D. Callahan (eds.) Morals, Science and Sociality, The Hastings Center, Hastings-on-Hudson, pp. 202–214.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Thomasma, D.: 1983, ‘The limitations of the autonomy model for the doctor-patient relation’, The Pharos.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Thomasma, D.: 1983, ‘Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: A model of physician's conscience for the doctor-patient relationship’, Annals of Internal Medicine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Thomasma
    • 1
  1. 1.Stritch School of MedicineLoyola University Medical Center, Medical Humanities ProgramMaywoodUSA

Personalised recommendations