Abstract
In this commentary on the article by Arthur L. Caplan [1] the philosophy of medicine is viewed from a medical perspective. Philosophical studies have a long tradition in medicine, especially during periods of paradigmatic unrest, and they serve the same goal as other medical activities: the prevention and treatment of disease. The medical profession needs the help of professional philosophers in much the same way as it needs the cooperation of basic scientists. Philosophy of medicine may not deserve the status of a philosophical subspecialty or field, but it so closely linked to the main trends of contemporary medical thinking that it must be regarded as an emerging (or reemerging) medical subdiscipline.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caplan A. Does the philosophy of medicine exist? Theor Med 1992;13:67–77.
Mackie JL. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.
Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
Winch P. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
Harré R. The Philosophies of Science. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Popper K. Normal science and its dangers. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970:51–8.
Cullen W. Method of study. Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 1987; 17:268–85.
Löwy I, ed. The Polish School of Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wulff, H.R. Philosophy of medicine — From a medical perspective. Theor Med Bioeth 13, 79–85 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489221
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489221