Abstract
Immediate knowledge is here construed as true belief that does not owe its status as knowledge to support by other knowledge (or justified belief) of the same subject. The bulk of the paper is devoted to a criticism of attempts to show the impossibility of immediate knowledge. I concentrate on attempts by Wilfrid Sellars and Laurence Bonjour to show that putative immediate knowledge really depends on higher-level knowledge or justified belief about the status of the beliefs involved in the putative immediate knowledge. It is concluded that their arguments are lacking in cogency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston, W. P.: 1971, ‘Varieties of Privileged Access’, Amer. Phil. Quart. 8, 223–241.
Alston, W. P.: 1976a, ‘Has Foundationalism Been Refuted?’, Phil. Stud. 29, 287–305.
Alston, W. P.: 1976b, ‘Two Types of Foundationalism’, Journ. Phil. 85, 165–185.
Alston, W. P.: 1980, ‘Level Confusions in Epistemology’, Midwest Stud. Phil. 5, 135–150.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1973, Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, London: Cambridge U. Press.
Aune, B.: 1967, Knowledge, Mind, and Nature, New York: Random House.
Blanshard, B.: 1939, The Nature of Thought, London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bonjour, L.: 1978, ‘Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?’, Amer. Phil. Quart. 15, 1–13.
Bosanquet, B.: 1911, Logic or The Morphology of Knowledge, London: Oxford U. Press.
Bradley, F. H.: 1914, Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bradley, F. H.: 1922, The Principles of Logic, 2nd. ed., London: Oxford U. Press.
Chisholm, R. M.: 1977, Theory of Knowledge, 2nd, ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dewey, J.: 1938, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Henry Holt.
Dicker, G.: 1980, Perceptual Knowledge, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Firth, R.: 1964, ‘Coherence, Certainty, and Epistemic Priority’, Journ. Phil. 61, 545–557.
Goldman, A. I.: 1976, ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, Journ. Phil. 73, 771–791.
Goldman, A. I.: 1979, ‘What Is Justified Belief?’, in G. S. Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Lehrer, K.: 1974, Knowledge, London: Oxford U. Press.
Meyers, R. G.: 1981, ‘Sellars' Rejection of Foundations’, Phil. Stud. 39, 61–78.
Peirce, C. S.: 1939, The Nature of Thought, London: George Allen & Unwin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press, Vol. V.
Pollock, J. L.: 1974, Knowledge and Justification, Princeton: Princeton U. Press.
Sellars, W.: 1963, Science, Perception, and Reality, New York: Humanities Press.
Sellars, W.: 1975, ‘The Structure of Knowledge’, in H. N. Castaneda (ed.), Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfred Sellars, Indianapolis: Bobbs, Merril Co.
Sellars, W.: 1979, ‘More on Givenness and Explanatory Coherence’, in G. S. Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Sosa, E.: 1980, ‘The Raft and the Pyramid’, Midwest Stud. Phil. 5, 3–25.
Swain, M.: 1981, Reasons and Knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell U. Press.
Will, F. L.: 1974, Induction and Justification, Ithaca, NY: Cornell U. Press.
Williams, M.: 1977, Groundless Belief, New Haven: Yale U. Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alston, W.P. What's wrong with immediate knowledge?. Synthese 55, 73–95 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485374
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485374