Skip to main content

A generalization of the theory of subjective probability and expected utility

Abstract

A generalization of the usual approach to the expected utility theory is given, with the aim of representing the state of belief of an agent who may decline on grounds of ignorance to express a preference between a given pair of acts and would, therefore, be considered irrational from a Bayesian point of view. Taking state, act, and outcome as primitive concepts, a utility function on the outcomes is constructed in the usual way. Each act is represented by a utility-valued function on the states — but not all such functions are taken to represent acts. A weaker than usual set of axioms on preferences between acts is now postulated. It is shown that any agent can be represented by a ‘risk function’ that assigns to each (mixed) state ω a number that gives the maximum loss (in utility) the agent might expect should ω be the actual state of the world. The form of the risk function is determined, both in general and in important particular cases. The results show that any rational agent behaves as though he were acting under the guidance of a set of Bayesian (or, more generally, ‘pseudo-Bayesian’) advisors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Anscombe, F. J. and Aumann, R. J.: 1963, ‘A Definition of Subjective Probability’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimow, L. and Ellis, A. J.: 1980, Convexity Theory and its Application in Functional Analysis, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G.: 1948, Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G.: 1969, Lectures on Analysis, Volume II, Representation Theory, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daboni, L. et al. (eds.): 1986, Recent Developments in the Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T.: 1958, Linear Operators, Part I, Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland, I. and Temem, R.: 1976, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1969, ‘A General Theory of Subjective Probabilities and Expected Utilities’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40, 1419–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C.: 1981, ‘Subjective Expected Utility: a Review of Normative Theories’, Theory and Decision 13, 139–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, R.: 1988a, ‘Representing Uncertain Belief’, in Proceedings of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Workshop, NAFIPS 1988, pp. 70–75.

  • Giles, R.: 1988b, ‘A Utility-valued Logic for Decision-making’, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2, 113–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W.: 1907, Pragmatism, Longmans, Green and Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W., Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R.: 1964, ‘The Foundations of Decision under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 59, 353–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J.: 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, Dover, Mineola, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semadeni, Z.: 1971, Banach Spaces of Continuous Functions, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2d ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giles, R. A generalization of the theory of subjective probability and expected utility. Synthese 90, 301–343 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485354

Keywords

  • Utility Function
  • Actual State
  • Rational Agent
  • Risk Function
  • Subjective Probability