Abstract
A generalization of the usual approach to the expected utility theory is given, with the aim of representing the state of belief of an agent who may decline on grounds of ignorance to express a preference between a given pair of acts and would, therefore, be considered irrational from a Bayesian point of view. Taking state, act, and outcome as primitive concepts, a utility function on the outcomes is constructed in the usual way. Each act is represented by a utility-valued function on the states — but not all such functions are taken to represent acts. A weaker than usual set of axioms on preferences between acts is now postulated. It is shown that any agent can be represented by a ‘risk function’ that assigns to each (mixed) state ω a number that gives the maximum loss (in utility) the agent might expect should ω be the actual state of the world. The form of the risk function is determined, both in general and in important particular cases. The results show that any rational agent behaves as though he were acting under the guidance of a set of Bayesian (or, more generally, ‘pseudo-Bayesian’) advisors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Anscombe, F. J. and Aumann, R. J.: 1963, ‘A Definition of Subjective Probability’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 199–205.
Asimow, L. and Ellis, A. J.: 1980, Convexity Theory and its Application in Functional Analysis, Academic Press, London.
Birkhoff, G.: 1948, Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, New York.
Choquet, G.: 1969, Lectures on Analysis, Volume II, Representation Theory, Benjamin, New York.
Daboni, L. et al. (eds.): 1986, Recent Developments in the Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T.: 1958, Linear Operators, Part I, Interscience, New York.
Ekeland, I. and Temem, R.: 1976, Convex Analysis and Variational Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Fishburn, P. C.: 1969, ‘A General Theory of Subjective Probabilities and Expected Utilities’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40, 1419–29.
Fishburn, P. C.: 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.
Fishburn, P. C.: 1981, ‘Subjective Expected Utility: a Review of Normative Theories’, Theory and Decision 13, 139–99.
Giles, R.: 1988a, ‘Representing Uncertain Belief’, in Proceedings of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Workshop, NAFIPS 1988, pp. 70–75.
Giles, R.: 1988b, ‘A Utility-valued Logic for Decision-making’, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2, 113–41.
James, W.: 1907, Pragmatism, Longmans, Green and Co., New York.
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York.
Pratt, J. W., Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R.: 1964, ‘The Foundations of Decision under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 59, 353–75.
Savage, L. J.: 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, Dover, Mineola, NY.
Semadeni, Z.: 1971, Banach Spaces of Continuous Functions, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw.
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2d ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giles, R. A generalization of the theory of subjective probability and expected utility. Synthese 90, 301–343 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485354
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485354
Keywords
- Utility Function
- Actual State
- Rational Agent
- Risk Function
- Subjective Probability