Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on Ronald Giere

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good expresses agreement that the controversy between Bayesian and non-Bayesian statistics is more fundamental than that between Carnap and Popper, and points out that his own position is a Bayes/non-Bayes compromise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia

    I. J. Good

Authors
  1. I. J. Good
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Good, I.J. Comments on Ronald Giere. Synthese 30, 133 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485300

Search

Navigation