Abstract
In Phylogenetic Systematics (1966), Willi Hennig conflates the Linnaean hierarchy with what Hennig refers to as the “divisional hierarchy”. In doing so, he lays the foundations of that school of biological taxonomy known as “cladism” on a philosophically ambiguous basis. This paper compares and contrasts the two hierarchies and demonstrates that Hennig conflates them. It shows that Hennig's followers also conflate them. Finally, it illuminates five persistent problems in cladism by suggesting that they arise from Hennig's original confusion.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Gregg, J. R.: 1954, The Language of Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, trans. D. D. Davis and R. Zangerl, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Hull, D. L.: 1970, ‘Contemporary Systematic Philosophies’, Annual Review of Ecology Systematics 1, 19–54.
Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘The Limits of Cladism’, Systematic Zoology 28, 416–40.
Mayr, E.: 1974, ‘Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?’, in E. Mayr, Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 433–76.
Nelson, G. and N. Platnick: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography, Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.
Ridley, M:, 1986, Evolution and Classification, The Reformation of Cladism, Longman, London.
Woodger, J. H.: 1952, ‘From Biology to Mathematics’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science 3, 1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, P.A. Confusion in cladism. Synthese 91, 135–152 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484973
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484973
Keywords
- Persistent Problem
- Ambiguous Basis
- Phylogenetic Systematic
- Biological Taxonomy
- Linnaean Hierarchy