Skip to main content

Darwinians at war Bateson's place in histories of Darwinism

Abstract

The controversy between Biometricians and Mendelians has been called an “inexplicable embarrassment” since it revolved around the mistaken identification of Mendelian genetics with non-Darwinian saltationism, a mistake traced back to the non-Darwinian William Bateson, who introduced Mendelian analysis to British science. The following paper beings to unravel this standard account of the controversy by raising a simple question: Given that Bateson embraced evolution by natural selection and that he studied the causes of variation within a broadly Darwinian framework of problems and questions, how are we to understand the claim that he was a non-Darwinian? A brief survey of possible responses to this question is followed by an alternative proposal: the controversy will be considered as a struggle among Darwinians about the future course of Darwinism. On this account, Darwin's own work led to the juncture at which Mendelians and Biometricians parted company, indeed, the Origin itself prepared the divergent methodological stances subsequently adopted by Bateson and his antagonists. The inexplicable embarrassment is dissolved through the parsimonious reconstruction of the profound substantive conflict between Biometricians and Mendelians as a chapter in the articulation and differentiation of the Darwinian research programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bateson, Beatrice: 1928, William Bateson, F. R. S. Naturalist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William: 1894, Materials for the Study of Variation, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William: 1909, Mendel's Principles of Heredity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William: 1922, ‘Evolutionary Faith and Modern Doubts’, Science 55, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William: 1928, Scientific Papers of William Bateson, R. C. Punnett (ed.), 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William: 1979, Problems of Genetics, reprint of 1913 edition, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter: 1988, The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, William Keith: 1883, The Law of Heredity: A Study of the Cause of Variation and the Origin of Living Organisms, John Murphy, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock, A. G.: 1973, ‘William Bateson, Mendelism and Biometry’, Journal of the History of Biology 6, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W.: 1970, ‘Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science’, Centaurus 15, 228–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L.: 1977, ‘William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism’, Journal of the History of Biology 10, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1887, The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, 2nd edn., Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1903, More Letters of Charles Darwin, 2 vols., Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1962, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Species in the Struggle for Life, 6th edn., Collier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1964, On the Origin of Species (facsimile of the 1st edn.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, L.: 1975, ‘Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study — The English Biometric School and Mendel's Laws’, Social Studies of Science 5, 269–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre, Lucien: 1982, The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A.: 1936, ‘Has Mendel's Work been Rediscovered’, Annals of Science 1, 115–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froggatt, P. and N. C. Nevin: 1971a, ‘Galton's “Law of Ancestral Heredity”: Its Influence on the Early Development of Human Genetics’, History of Science 10, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froggatt, P. and N. C. Nevin: 1971b, ‘The “Law of Ancestral Heredity” and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England, 1889–1906’, Journal of Medical Genetics 8, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1985, ‘Darwinism as a Historical Entity: A Historiographic Proposal’, in David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 773–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian: 1943, Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, Harper Brothers, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Darwin's Achievement’, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, pp. 123–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.: 1981, ‘Sociobiologies in Competition: The Biometrician-Mendelian Debate’, in Charles Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine and Society 1840–1940, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 243–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. and B. Barnes: 1975, ‘Biometriker versus Mendelianer’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 18 (Wissenschaftssoziologie), pp. 165–96.

  • MacKenzie, D. and B. Barnes: 1979, ‘Scientific Judgment: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy’, in Barry Barnes and Steven Shapin (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, Sage, London, pp. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1973, ‘The Recent Historiography of Genetics’, Journal of the History of Biology 6, 125–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1976, Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Belknap, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1980, ‘Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis’, in Ernst Mayr and William Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1985, ‘Darwin's Five Theories of Evolution’, in David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 755–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. and W. Provine (eds.): 1980, The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K.: 1987, ‘Three Fragments from a Sociologist's Notebook: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials’, Annual Review of Sociology 13, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A.: 1990, ‘Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy’, Biology & Philosophy 5, 379–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A.: 1991, ‘The Evolutionary Analysis: Apparent Error, Certified Belief, and the Defects of Asymmetry’, unpublished manuscript.

  • Norton, B.: 1973, ‘The Biometric Defense of Darwinism’, Journal of the History of Biology 6, 272–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.: 1975a, ‘Metaphysics and Population Genetics: Karl Pearson and the Background to Fisher's Multi-Factorial Theory of Inheritance’, Annals of Science 32, 537–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.: 1975b, ‘Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry’, Journal of the History of Biology 8, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, R.: 1988, ‘The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate’, British Journal for the History of Science 22, 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K.: 1902, ‘On the Fundamental Conceptions of Biology’, Biometrika 11, 320–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, William: 1971, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils: 1980, ‘The Controversy between Biometricians and Mendelians: A Test Case for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’, Social Science Information 19, 501–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, George John: 1896, Darwin, and after Darwin: The Darwinian Theory, Open Court, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, W. F. R.: 1901–02, ‘Mendel's Laws of Alternative Inheritance in Peas’, Biometrika 1, 228–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, W. F. R.: 1902–03, ‘On the Ambiguity of Mendel's Categories’, Biometrika 2, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordmann, A. Darwinians at war Bateson's place in histories of Darwinism. Synthese 91, 53–72 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484969

Keywords

  • Research Programme
  • Natural Selection
  • Standard Account
  • Simple Question
  • Alternative Proposal