, Volume 29, Issue 1–4, pp 229–242 | Cite as

Superposition and macroscopic observation

  • Nancy Delaney Cartwright
Part II/Probability


Macroscopic Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ballentine, L. E., ‘The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 42 (1970), 358–381.Google Scholar
  2. Bub, J., ‘The Daneri-Loinger-Prosperi Quantum Theory of Measurement’, Il Nuovo Cimento 57B (1968), 503–520.Google Scholar
  3. Daneri, A., Loinger, A., and Prosperi, G. M., ‘Quantum Theory of Measurement and Ergodicity Conditions’, Nuclear Physics 33 (1962), 297–319.Google Scholar
  4. Daneri, A., Loinger, A., and Prosperi, G. M., ‘Further Remarks on the Relation Between Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Theory of Measurement’, Il Nuovo Cimento 44B (1966), 119–128.Google Scholar
  5. Fano, U., ‘Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrices and Operator Techniques’, Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (1957), 74–93.Google Scholar
  6. Farquhar, I. E. and Landsberg, P. T., ‘On the Quantum-Statistical Ergodic and H-Theorems’, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 239 (1957), 134–144.Google Scholar
  7. Fine, A., ‘Insolubility of the Quantum Measurement Problem’, Physical Review D2 (1970), 2783–2787.Google Scholar
  8. Fine, A., ‘The Two Problems of Quantum Measurement’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science IV, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Fine, A., ‘Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1973), 1–37. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Groenewold, H. J., ‘Quantal Observation in Statistical Interpretation’, in T. Bastin (ed.), Quantum Theory and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. Jauch, J., Foundations of Quantum Theory, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Kochen, S. and Specker, E., ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967), 59–87.Google Scholar
  13. Prosperi, G. M. and Scotti, A., ‘Ergodicity Conditions in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1 (1960), 218–221.Google Scholar
  14. Putnam, H., ‘A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Mechanics’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. van Fraassen, B., ‘A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. van Fraassen, B., ‘Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic’, in C. A. Hooker (ed.), Contemporary Research in Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. van Kampen, N. G., ‘Quantum Statistics of Irreversible Processes’, Physica 20 (1954), 603–621.Google Scholar
  18. von Neumann, J., ‘Beweiss des Ergodensatzes und des H-Theorems in der neuen Mechanik’, Zeitschrift für Physik 57 (1929), 30–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy Delaney Cartwright
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations