Abstract
The purpose of this article is to show that Piaget's use of the equilibrium principle cannot explain the possibility of correct understanding. That is, it cannot explain the possibility of knowledge, as opposed to simple change in belief. To make the argument, I begin by describing Piaget's explanatory model, which is known as the equilibrium principle. I then argue that correct understanding, or knowledge of any x as a case of y, requires a concept of correctness, i.e., the recognition that words and concepts apply under some conditions but not others. I try to show that because he uses the equilibrium principle as a basis for his explanation, Piaget cannot explain how a concept of correctness is acquired. Finally, I argue that to explain the possibility of knowledge, one must show how the conditions for word and concept application are determined by a community of language users. Again, I claim that Piaget's use of the equilibrium model precludes such an account.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A.: 1979, ‘Conscious and Unconscious Cognition: A Computational Metaphor for the Mechanism of Attention and Integration’, in Nilsson (ed.), Perspectives on Memory Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Aristotle: 1941, The Basic Works of Aristotle, R. McKeon (ed.), W. D. Ross (trans.), Random House, New York.
Baldwin, J. M.: 1915, Mental Development in the Child and the Race: Methods and Processes, Macmillan, New York.
Collins, A., E. H. Warnock, N. Aiello, and M. L. Miller: 1975, ‘Reasoning from Incomplete Knowledge’, in D. G. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, Academic Press, New York, pp. 383–425.
Dewey, J.: 1933, How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, D.C. Heath, Boston.
Erikson, E. H.: 1960, Childhood and Society, W. W. Norton, New York.
Freud, S.: 1923/1960, The Ego and the Id, J. Riviere (trans), J. Strachey (trans. and ed.), W. W. Norton, New York.
Hamlyn, D. W.: 1983, Perception, Learning and the Self: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hamlyn, D. W.: 1982, ‘The Concept of Social Reality’, in P. Second (ed.), Explaining Human Behavior: Consciousness, Human Action and Social Structure, Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills, California.
Hamlyn, D. W.: 1981, ‘What Exactly is Social About the Origins of Understanding?’, in P. Light and G. Butterworth (eds.), The Individual and the Social in Cognitive Development, The Harvester Press, Brighton, England.
Haroutunian, S.: 1983, Equilibrium in the Balance: A Study of Psychological Explanation, Springer Series in Cognitive Development, C. J. Brainard (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York.
Haroutunian, S.: 1979a, Essay Review of Jean Piaget's Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes, Harvard Educational Review 49, 93–100.
Haroutunian, S.: 1979b, ‘A Biological Conception of Knowledge: One Problematic Consequence’, Educational Theory 30, 203–209.
Haroutunian, S.: 1978, ‘Piaget's Explanation of ‘Stage’ Transition’, The Monist 61, 622–635.
Hintikka, M. P. and J. Hintikka: 1979, ‘Different Language Games in Wittgenstein’, Proceedings, 4th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 1979, pp. 417–422.
Kripke, S. A.: 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Piaget, J.: 1976/1978, Behavior and Evolution, Donald Nicholson-Smith (trans.), Pantheon Press, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1975/1977, The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures, A. Rosin (trans.), The Viking Press, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1974/1980, Adaptation and Intelligence: Organic Selection and Phenocopy, S. Eames (trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Piaget, J.: 1970, ‘Piaget's Theory’, in H. Mussen (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology, Wiley, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1970/1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology, W. Mays (trans.), Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1967/1971, Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations Between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes, B. Walsh (trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Piaget, J.: 1964/1968, Six Psychological Studies, D. Elkind (trans.), Random House, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1945/1962, Play, Dreams and Imitation, C. Gattegno and F. M. Hodgson (trans.), W. W. Norton, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1937/1954, The Construction of Reality in the Child, M. Cook (trans.), Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J.: 1936/1952, The Origins of Intelligence in Children, M. Cook (trans.), W. W. Norton, New York.
Plato: 1961, ‘Meno’, in W. K. C. Guthrie (trans.), E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.), The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Bollinger Series LXXI, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Spencer, H.: 1892, The Principles of Psychology, I & II, D. Appleton, New York.
Waddington, C. H.: 1960, ‘Evolutionary Adaptation’, in Evolution After Darwin, the University of Chicago Centennial, Vol. I, The Evolution of Life, Sol Tax (ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Waddington, C. H.: 1957, The Strategy of the Genes, Allen & Unwin, London.
Werner, H.: 1948, The Comparative Psychology of Mental Development, Follett Publishing, Chicago.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1958, Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Macmillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haroutunian, S. Can Jean Piaget explain the possibility of knowledge?. Synthese 65, 65–86 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484887
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484887